From patchwork Wed Sep 25 15:01:05 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ard Biesheuvel X-Patchwork-Id: 13812091 Received: from mail-yb1-f202.google.com (mail-yb1-f202.google.com [209.85.219.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 774CD17E005 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.202 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727276525; cv=none; b=pvKxyfmNbsbMqAXtsZhUgG7Fhr7NamhNmwcbEvtsS54WKZAtKqcqIBuny7cYGSjfit9Q6mVvK/qbq9IjDXDhgi0OtOOWYUpeYmFIi3C4n5darhYydFKPkqd+ncq26xIcfmA9CIYArkHjZ0WgUuZSrAncH4MtsGHuJcKt2aH62qA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727276525; c=relaxed/simple; bh=E/ekk1rehkbBpUh1L7h/NGwV62IOjSTKuZGPf/08C+4=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=ESRX3EuFbHkU44QWWR6k6/X3av9dWf1i5/m5wLu9ChHXTv7cHEph1gD099ncumrNmgqC0XRATmZu0gD8z6PdzFp+EO1TGBMxp5sDcwg2siHnwBARmYDa4XqHSCxKdusHtnmpqmVmPJOfcCZnLhsipV7wpwGTPj3oVJ5AE4xWJuY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ardb.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=fzK7lDY/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ardb.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="fzK7lDY/" Received: by mail-yb1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e1d46cee0b0so10266956276.2 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:02:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1727276522; x=1727881322; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hcBJaG4CjYcevMfAnFyKwMdAr3oBLta0TuXom4JmDi8=; b=fzK7lDY/T6qPwo1r7GQEYwhSXVfvWqdperrVUsFRMT/3la27zD4W4ba937y/+GWeDt 8JpngM4iRo/c4yMyIn9mHwNiucOLHRqSrPuk8iA/zC3LNjnbWM+Bi1aaxW3IshnN3Ri3 BvmpMhPh3S0NyUZvw/Ex6NkkdCp1p6fuGS5ptoGcEtbOzxt9V2i02Td09h9LXmQbP3/b iJ19pHtN4Z/lRz5Zp1irRecr1YrXL01NkRQLLc0nQz7CA17O2ux1kLDicjO/8vFyTmGz x0aOiAzX4h38PTDOx28g+6E6RVcgpUly4u2XdWbrXvyVEmXSA+RoL6R29jQJc/XfcJod hN0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727276522; x=1727881322; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hcBJaG4CjYcevMfAnFyKwMdAr3oBLta0TuXom4JmDi8=; b=IVn5fOlw5GkSizxiEKPINdq5mUsasS7Kn6yJqw2KXHdgUBrkqAeHegJv00rENheRsz BAABHnN0rZy0mdDrSYp4rA/OkJ610k2yr7/Rf4oEqK0inDFl+KZ8j11nv7ZeGikZwiP0 d3EqJdj6R96Z/dm3htEqUnq0bvj8C+uK94VkwVch5wZVJ/K/JtJ//HKQSjX4rTBSX34N lcJzF3FE272lltzgy0aFPRg5MsH1uUcUvo5/RoRO/TTOdJ+W5uPHA0+nFbLyHhLivpyL 48V0sfz/X/xS6ChmyG1YY3ilMWzCrM/Mw4cMEduk6H5TGdrps0FjHCmpLh4BnVGC4X8K 1aRQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU8TGMrw6PWSwZ6IrYKLcbtbUxPMzAqs8WGW62CKTuO7Xuw9B5jEwdwFYzW6DqCW1cIZCA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyxMAWKn7NZFgldajA687TXWbHLYjstcohRpQkYj8Vvf2l7Q1mb RPWLSzNXkxHIZeODRLShLywQ6ROaXr4Q744GG1Ru1RzPhlRKPmiz3SK57G+dkRrNiU1DVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHVPP/hq0VdoG8mz8zZDpKENYQvppd12tQOBs96+ky0ZuGKlW9zxaw1GBiDRtGEwfqJMJeN7cfB X-Received: from palermo.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7b:198d:ac11:8138]) (user=ardb job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:d695:0:b0:e1a:70ed:6ec9 with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-e24d7352785mr29529276.2.1727276522332; Wed, 25 Sep 2024 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:01:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240925150059.3955569-30-ardb+git@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20240925150059.3955569-30-ardb+git@google.com> X-Developer-Key: i=ardb@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=F43D03328115A198C90016883D200E9CA6329909 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=4340; i=ardb@kernel.org; h=from:subject; bh=I7lWAHThqqqqnrpiqIQsu32XeIcDrKE8EBFU/14ypJ4=; b=owGbwMvMwCFmkMcZplerG8N4Wi2JIe2L6manxvx6ho28axaYV4atC9wvG5Igfbri2+G3gWYqn maGuz52lLIwiHEwyIopsgjM/vtu5+mJUrXOs2Rh5rAygQxh4OIUgIl4nmVkaA1czF6Uafzbsi92 efGhdw7lev3pD99ze/Rc9uE4U+u6lZHhb2nzhL8Z7seME5YcX8rFdHZX6uJJe7jF87S7K1vP1Mh zAQA= X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0.792.g87dc391469-goog Message-ID: <20240925150059.3955569-35-ardb+git@google.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH 05/28] x86: Define the stack protector guard symbol explicitly From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Uros Bizjak , Dennis Zhou , Tejun Heo , Christoph Lameter , Mathieu Desnoyers , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Arnd Bergmann , Masahiro Yamada , Kees Cook , Nathan Chancellor , Keith Packard , Justin Stitt , Josh Poimboeuf , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Namhyung Kim , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev From: Ard Biesheuvel Specify the guard symbol for the stack cookie explicitly, rather than positioning it exactly 40 bytes into the per-CPU area. Doing so removes the need for the per-CPU region to be absolute rather than relative to the placement of the per-CPU template region in the kernel image, and this allows the special handling for absolute per-CPU symbols to be removed entirely. This is a worthwhile cleanup in itself, but it is also a prerequisite for PIE codegen and PIE linking, which can replace our bespoke and rather clunky runtime relocation handling. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- arch/x86/Makefile | 4 ++++ arch/x86/include/asm/init.h | 2 +- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 11 +++-------- arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 4 ---- tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile index 6b3fe6e2aadd..b78b7623a4a9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile @@ -193,6 +193,10 @@ else KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Cno-redzone=y KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += -Ccode-model=kernel + ifeq ($(CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR),y) + KBUILD_CFLAGS += -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=fixed_percpu_data + endif + # Don't emit relaxable GOTPCREL relocations KBUILD_AFLAGS_KERNEL += -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no KBUILD_CFLAGS_KERNEL += -Wa,-mrelax-relocations=no diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/init.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/init.h index 14d72727d7ee..3ed0e8ec973f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/init.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/init.h @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ #ifndef _ASM_X86_INIT_H #define _ASM_X86_INIT_H -#define __head __section(".head.text") +#define __head __section(".head.text") __no_stack_protector struct x86_mapping_info { void *(*alloc_pgt_page)(void *); /* allocate buf for page table */ diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 4a686f0e5dbf..56bc36116814 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -402,14 +402,9 @@ struct irq_stack { #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 struct fixed_percpu_data { /* - * GCC hardcodes the stack canary as %gs:40. Since the - * irq_stack is the object at %gs:0, we reserve the bottom - * 48 bytes of the irq stack for the canary. - * - * Once we are willing to require -mstack-protector-guard-symbol= - * support for x86_64 stackprotector, we can get rid of this. + * Since the irq_stack is the object at %gs:0, the bottom 8 bytes of + * the irq stack are reserved for the canary. */ - char gs_base[40]; unsigned long stack_canary; }; @@ -418,7 +413,7 @@ DECLARE_INIT_PER_CPU(fixed_percpu_data); static inline unsigned long cpu_kernelmode_gs_base(int cpu) { - return (unsigned long)per_cpu(fixed_percpu_data.gs_base, cpu); + return (unsigned long)&per_cpu(fixed_percpu_data, cpu); } extern asmlinkage void entry_SYSCALL32_ignore(void); diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h index 00473a650f51..d1dcd22a0a4c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/stackprotector.h @@ -51,10 +51,6 @@ static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void) { unsigned long canary = get_random_canary(); -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 - BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct fixed_percpu_data, stack_canary) != 40); -#endif - current->stack_canary = canary; #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 this_cpu_write(fixed_percpu_data.stack_canary, canary); diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c index 37ce43c4eb8f..7ecfedf5edb9 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c @@ -2485,10 +2485,10 @@ static bool is_stack_operation(struct arch *arch, struct disasm_line *dl) static bool is_stack_canary(struct arch *arch, struct annotated_op_loc *loc) { - /* On x86_64, %gs:40 is used for stack canary */ + /* On x86_64, %gs:0 is used for stack canary */ if (arch__is(arch, "x86")) { if (loc->segment == INSN_SEG_X86_GS && loc->imm && - loc->offset == 40) + loc->offset == 0) return true; }