@@ -1645,6 +1645,11 @@ static bool kvm_rmap_age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm,
return young;
}
+static bool kvm_has_shadow_mmu_sptes(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return !tdp_mmu_enabled || READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages);
+}
+
bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
{
bool young = false;
@@ -1652,7 +1657,7 @@ bool kvm_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
young = kvm_tdp_mmu_age_gfn_range(kvm, range);
- if (kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
+ if (kvm_has_shadow_mmu_sptes(kvm)) {
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
young |= kvm_rmap_age_gfn_range(kvm, range, false);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
@@ -1668,7 +1673,7 @@ bool kvm_test_age_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_gfn_range *range)
if (tdp_mmu_enabled)
young = kvm_tdp_mmu_test_age_gfn(kvm, range);
- if (!young && kvm_memslots_have_rmaps(kvm)) {
+ if (!young && kvm_has_shadow_mmu_sptes(kvm)) {
write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
young |= kvm_rmap_age_gfn_range(kvm, range, true);
write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
Optimize both kvm_age_gfn and kvm_test_age_gfn's interaction with the shadow MMU by, rather than checking if our memslot has rmaps, check if there are any indirect_shadow_pages at all. Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)