@@ -261,6 +261,40 @@ void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms,
}
}
+bool machine_parse_smp_cache(MachineState *ms,
+ const SmpCachePropertiesList *caches,
+ Error **errp)
+{
+ const SmpCachePropertiesList *node;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(caches_bitmap, CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX);
+
+ for (node = caches; node; node = node->next) {
+ /* Prohibit users from setting the cache topology level to invalid. */
+ if (node->value->topology == CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_INVALID) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "Invalid cache topology level: %s. "
+ "The topology should match valid CPU topology level",
+ CpuTopologyLevel_str(node->value->topology));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Prohibit users from repeating settings. */
+ if (test_bit(node->value->cache, caches_bitmap)) {
+ error_setg(errp,
+ "Invalid cache properties: %s. "
+ "The cache properties are duplicated",
+ CacheLevelAndType_str(node->value->cache));
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ ms->smp_cache.props[node->value->cache].topology =
+ node->value->topology;
+ set_bit(node->value->cache, caches_bitmap);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
unsigned int machine_topo_get_cores_per_socket(const MachineState *ms)
{
return ms->smp.cores * ms->smp.modules * ms->smp.clusters * ms->smp.dies;
@@ -270,3 +304,9 @@ unsigned int machine_topo_get_threads_per_socket(const MachineState *ms)
{
return ms->smp.threads * machine_topo_get_cores_per_socket(ms);
}
+
+CpuTopologyLevel machine_get_cache_topo_level(const MachineState *ms,
+ CacheLevelAndType cache)
+{
+ return ms->smp_cache.props[cache].topology;
+}
@@ -932,6 +932,40 @@ static void machine_set_smp(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
machine_parse_smp_config(ms, config, errp);
}
+static void machine_get_smp_cache(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+ MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj);
+ SmpCache *cache = &ms->smp_cache;
+ SmpCachePropertiesList *head = NULL;
+ SmpCachePropertiesList **tail = &head;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX; i++) {
+ SmpCacheProperties *node = g_new(SmpCacheProperties, 1);
+
+ node->cache = cache->props[i].cache;
+ node->topology = cache->props[i].topology;
+ QAPI_LIST_APPEND(tail, node);
+ }
+
+ visit_type_SmpCachePropertiesList(v, name, &head, errp);
+ qapi_free_SmpCachePropertiesList(head);
+}
+
+static void machine_set_smp_cache(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
+ void *opaque, Error **errp)
+{
+ MachineState *ms = MACHINE(obj);
+ SmpCachePropertiesList *caches;
+
+ if (!visit_type_SmpCachePropertiesList(v, name, &caches, errp)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ machine_parse_smp_cache(ms, caches, errp);
+ qapi_free_SmpCachePropertiesList(caches);
+}
+
static void machine_get_boot(Object *obj, Visitor *v, const char *name,
void *opaque, Error **errp)
{
@@ -1057,6 +1091,11 @@ static void machine_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
object_class_property_set_description(oc, "smp",
"CPU topology");
+ object_class_property_add(oc, "smp-cache", "SmpCachePropertiesWrapper",
+ machine_get_smp_cache, machine_set_smp_cache, NULL, NULL);
+ object_class_property_set_description(oc, "smp-cache",
+ "Cache properties list for SMP machine");
+
object_class_property_add(oc, "phandle-start", "int",
machine_get_phandle_start, machine_set_phandle_start,
NULL, NULL);
@@ -1195,6 +1234,11 @@ static void machine_initfn(Object *obj)
ms->smp.cores = 1;
ms->smp.threads = 1;
+ for (int i = 0; i < CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX; i++) {
+ ms->smp_cache.props[i].cache = (CacheLevelAndType)i;
+ ms->smp_cache.props[i].topology = CPU_TOPOLOGY_LEVEL_DEFAULT;
+ }
+
machine_copy_boot_config(ms, &(BootConfiguration){ 0 });
}
@@ -44,8 +44,13 @@ void machine_set_cpu_numa_node(MachineState *machine,
Error **errp);
void machine_parse_smp_config(MachineState *ms,
const SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp);
+bool machine_parse_smp_cache(MachineState *ms,
+ const SmpCachePropertiesList *caches,
+ Error **errp);
unsigned int machine_topo_get_cores_per_socket(const MachineState *ms);
unsigned int machine_topo_get_threads_per_socket(const MachineState *ms);
+CpuTopologyLevel machine_get_cache_topo_level(const MachineState *ms,
+ CacheLevelAndType cache);
void machine_memory_devices_init(MachineState *ms, hwaddr base, uint64_t size);
/**
@@ -369,6 +374,10 @@ typedef struct CpuTopology {
unsigned int max_cpus;
} CpuTopology;
+typedef struct SmpCache {
+ SmpCacheProperties props[CACHE_LEVEL_AND_TYPE__MAX];
+} SmpCache;
+
/**
* MachineState:
*/
@@ -419,6 +428,7 @@ struct MachineState {
AccelState *accelerator;
CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
CpuTopology smp;
+ SmpCache smp_cache;
struct NVDIMMState *nvdimms_state;
struct NumaState *numa_state;
};
@@ -62,3 +62,53 @@
{ 'enum': 'CpuTopologyLevel',
'data': [ 'invalid', 'thread', 'core', 'module', 'cluster',
'die', 'socket', 'book', 'drawer', 'default' ] }
+
+##
+# @CacheLevelAndType:
+#
+# Caches a system may have. The enumeration value here is the
+# combination of cache level and cache type.
+#
+# @l1d: L1 data cache.
+#
+# @l1i: L1 instruction cache.
+#
+# @l2: L2 (unified) cache.
+#
+# @l3: L3 (unified) cache
+#
+# Since: 9.2
+##
+{ 'enum': 'CacheLevelAndType',
+ 'data': [ 'l1d', 'l1i', 'l2', 'l3' ] }
+
+##
+# @SmpCacheProperties:
+#
+# Cache information for SMP system.
+#
+# @cache: Cache name, which is the combination of cache level
+# and cache type.
+#
+# @topology: Cache topology level. It accepts the CPU topology
+# enumeration as the parameter, i.e., CPUs in the same
+# topology container share the same cache.
+#
+# Since: 9.2
+##
+{ 'struct': 'SmpCacheProperties',
+ 'data': {
+ 'cache': 'CacheLevelAndType',
+ 'topology': 'CpuTopologyLevel' } }
+
+##
+# @SmpCachePropertiesWrapper:
+#
+# List wrapper of SmpCacheProperties.
+#
+# @caches: the list of SmpCacheProperties.
+#
+# Since 9.2
+##
+{ 'struct': 'SmpCachePropertiesWrapper',
+ 'data': { 'caches': ['SmpCacheProperties'] } }
The x86 and ARM need to allow user to configure cache properties (current only topology): * For x86, the default cache topology model (of max/host CPU) does not always match the Host's real physical cache topology. Performance can increase when the configured virtual topology is closer to the physical topology than a default topology would be. * For ARM, QEMU can't get the cache topology information from the CPU registers, then user configuration is necessary. Additionally, the cache information is also needed for MPAM emulation (for TCG) to build the right PPTT. Define smp-cache related enumeration and properties in QAPI, so that user could configure cache properties for SMP system through -machine in the subsequent patch. Cache enumeration (CacheLevelAndType) is implemented as the combination of cache level (level 1/2/3) and cache type (data/instruction/unified). Currently, separated L1 cache (L1 data cache and L1 instruction cache) with unified higher-level cache (e.g., unified L2 and L3 caches), is the most common cache architectures. Therefore, enumerate the L1 D-cache, L1 I-cache, L2 cache and L3 cache with smp-cache object to add the basic cache topology support. Other kinds of caches (e.g., L1 unified or L2/L3 separated caches) can be added directly into CacheLevelAndType if necessary. Cache properties (SmpCacheProperties) currently only contains cache topology information, and other cache properties can be added in it if necessary. Note, define cache topology based on CPU topology level with two reasons: 1. In practice, a cache will always be bound to the CPU container (either private in the CPU container or shared among multiple containers), and CPU container is often expressed in terms of CPU topology level. 2. The x86's cache-related CPUIDs encode cache topology based on APIC ID's CPU topology layout. And the ACPI PPTT table that ARM/RISCV relies on also requires CPU containers to help indicate the private shared hierarchy of the cache. Therefore, for SMP systems, it is natural to use the CPU topology hierarchy directly in QEMU to define the cache topology. With smp-cache QAPI support, add smp cache topology for machine by parsing the smp-cache object list. Also add a helper to access cache topology level of machine. Suggested-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> Tested-by: Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> --- Suggested by credit: * Referred to Daniel's suggestion to introduce cache object list. --- Changes since Patch v2: * Updated version of new QAPI structures to v9.2. (Jonathan) * Merged the folloup commit ("hw/core: Add smp cache topology for machine") into this patch as the use case of smp-cache QAPI. (Jonathan) * Optimized the error_message line breaks to be more grep-friendly. (Jonathan) * Reduced unnecessary "else" in machine_parse_smp_cache. (Jonathan) Changes since Patch v1: * Renamed SMPCacheProperty/SMPCacheProperties (QAPI structures) to SmpCacheProperties/SmpCachePropertiesWrapper. (Markus) * Renamed SMPCacheName (QAPI structure) to SmpCacheLevelAndType and dropped prefix. (Markus) * Renamed 'name' field in SmpCacheProperties to 'cache', since the type and level of the cache in SMP system could be able to specify all of these kinds of cache explicitly enough. * Renamed 'topo' field in SmpCacheProperties to 'topology'. (Markus) * Returned error information when user repeats setting cache properties. (Markus) * Renamed SmpCacheLevelAndType to CacheLevelAndType, since this representation is general across SMP or hybrid system. * Dropped handwriten smp-cache object and integrated cache pproperties list into MachineState (in next patch). (Markus) * Added the reason why x86 and ARM need to configure cache information. (Markus and Jonathan) Changes since RFC v2: * New commit to implement cache list with JSON format instead of multiple sub-options in -smp. --- hw/core/machine-smp.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/core/machine.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/hw/boards.h | 10 ++++++++ qapi/machine-common.json | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+)