Message ID | 20241204103042.1904639-4-arnd@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | x86: 32-bit cleanups | expand |
On Wed, Dec 04 2024 at 11:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Both 32-bit and 64-bit builds allow optimizing using "-march=atom", but > this is somewhat suboptimal, as gcc and clang use this option to refer > to the original in-order "Bonnell" microarchitecture used in the early > "Diamondville" and "Silverthorne" processors that were mostly 32-bit only. > > The later 22nm "Silvermont" architecture saw a significant redesign to > an out-of-order architecture that is reflected in the -mtune=silvermont > flag in the compilers, and all of these are 64-bit capable. In theory. There are quite some crippled variants of silvermont which are 32-bit only (either fused or at least officially not-supported to run 64-bit)...
On December 4, 2024 5:16:50 AM PST, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: >On Wed, Dec 04 2024 at 11:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> >> Both 32-bit and 64-bit builds allow optimizing using "-march=atom", but >> this is somewhat suboptimal, as gcc and clang use this option to refer >> to the original in-order "Bonnell" microarchitecture used in the early >> "Diamondville" and "Silverthorne" processors that were mostly 32-bit only. >> >> The later 22nm "Silvermont" architecture saw a significant redesign to >> an out-of-order architecture that is reflected in the -mtune=silvermont >> flag in the compilers, and all of these are 64-bit capable. > >In theory. There are quite some crippled variants of silvermont which >are 32-bit only (either fused or at least officially not-supported to >run 64-bit)... > Yeah. That was a sad story, which I unfortunately am not at liberty to share.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2024 at 5:55 PM H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > > On December 4, 2024 5:16:50 AM PST, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 04 2024 at 11:30, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > >> > >> Both 32-bit and 64-bit builds allow optimizing using "-march=atom", but > >> this is somewhat suboptimal, as gcc and clang use this option to refer > >> to the original in-order "Bonnell" microarchitecture used in the early > >> "Diamondville" and "Silverthorne" processors that were mostly 32-bit only. > >> > >> The later 22nm "Silvermont" architecture saw a significant redesign to > >> an out-of-order architecture that is reflected in the -mtune=silvermont > >> flag in the compilers, and all of these are 64-bit capable. > > > >In theory. There are quite some crippled variants of silvermont which > >are 32-bit only (either fused or at least officially not-supported to > >run 64-bit)... > Yeah. That was a sad story, which I unfortunately am not at liberty to share. Are they available in the wild? What I know with that core are Merrifield, Moorefield, and Bay Trail that were distributed in millions and are perfectly available, but I never heard about ones that are 32-bit only. The Avoton and Rangley I have read about on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvermont seems specific to the servers and routers and most likely are gone from use.
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu index 42e6a40876ea..05a3f57ac20b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.cpu @@ -155,6 +155,15 @@ config MPENTIUM4 -Paxville -Dempsey +config MATOM + bool "Intel Atom (Bonnell)" + help + + Select this for the Intel Atom platform. Intel Atom CPUs have an + in-order pipelining architecture and thus can benefit from + accordingly optimized code. + This includes all the 32-bit-only Atom chips such as N2xx and + Z5xx/Z6xx. config MK6 bool "K6/K6-II/K6-III" @@ -278,14 +287,17 @@ config MCORE2 family in /proc/cpuinfo. Newer ones have 6 and older ones 15 (not a typo) -config MATOM - bool "Intel Atom" +config MSILVERMONT + bool "Intel Atom (Silvermont/Goldmont)" + depends on X86_64 help - - Select this for the Intel Atom platform. Intel Atom CPUs have an - in-order pipelining architecture and thus can benefit from - accordingly optimized code. Use a recent GCC with specific Atom - support in order to fully benefit from selecting this option. + Select this to optimize for the 64-bit Intel Atom platform + of the 22nm Silvermont microarchitecture and its 14nm + Goldmont shrink (e.g. Atom C2xxx, Atom Z3xxx, Celeron + N2xxx/J1xxx, Pentium N3xxx/J2xxx). + Kernels built with this option are incompatible with very + early Atom CPUs based on the Bonnell microarchitecture, + such as Atom 230/330, D4xx/D5xx, D2xxx, N2xxx or Z2xxx. config GENERIC_CPU bool "Generic-x86-64" @@ -318,7 +330,7 @@ config X86_INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT config X86_L1_CACHE_SHIFT int default "7" if MPENTIUM4 || MPSC - default "6" if MK7 || MK8 || MPENTIUMM || MCORE2 || MATOM || MVIAC7 || X86_GENERIC || GENERIC_CPU + default "6" if MK7 || MK8 || MPENTIUMM || MCORE2 || MATOM || MSILVERMONT || MVIAC7 || X86_GENERIC || GENERIC_CPU default "4" if MELAN || M486SX || M486 || MGEODEGX1 default "5" if MWINCHIP3D || MWINCHIPC6 || MCRUSOE || MEFFICEON || MCYRIXIII || MK6 || MPENTIUMIII || MPENTIUMII || M686 || M586MMX || M586TSC || M586 || MVIAC3_2 || MGEODE_LX diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile index 5b773b34768d..05887ae282f5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile @@ -182,14 +182,14 @@ else cflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += -march=k8 cflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += -march=nocona cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += -march=core2 - cflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += -march=atom + cflags-$(CONFIG_MSILVERMONT) += -march=silvermont cflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -mtune=generic KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(cflags-y) rustflags-$(CONFIG_MK8) += -Ctarget-cpu=k8 rustflags-$(CONFIG_MPSC) += -Ctarget-cpu=nocona rustflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += -Ctarget-cpu=core2 - rustflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += -Ctarget-cpu=atom + rustflags-$(CONFIG_MSILVERMONT) += -Ctarget-cpu=silvermont rustflags-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU) += -Ztune-cpu=generic KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += $(rustflags-y) diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu b/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu index 94834c4b5e5e..0adc3a59520a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile_32.cpu @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@ cflags-$(CONFIG_MCYRIXIII) += $(call cc-option,-march=c3,-march=i486) $(align) cflags-$(CONFIG_MVIAC3_2) += $(call cc-option,-march=c3-2,-march=i686) cflags-$(CONFIG_MVIAC7) += -march=i686 cflags-$(CONFIG_MCORE2) += -march=i686 $(call tune,core2) -cflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += $(call cc-option,-march=atom,$(call cc-option,-march=core2,-march=i686)) \ - $(call cc-option,-mtune=atom,$(call cc-option,-mtune=generic)) +cflags-$(CONFIG_MATOM) += -march=atom # AMD Elan support cflags-$(CONFIG_MELAN) += -march=i486