From patchwork Tue Jul 25 08:41:34 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Xu, Haibo1" X-Patchwork-Id: 13326098 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89215C0015E for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232861AbjGYIi2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:38:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233052AbjGYIiO (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2023 04:38:14 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64851992; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 01:38:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1690274281; x=1721810281; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uf8Gsbg7FBNNbpgmLmy40kRrM0Q7yFPMJTNAbZ3eMQo=; b=Kc+74AtwGpQAqlKIXr9+KxRPGr87cOGdZVF2Vpq6RMKZhUPCLzHbsDtt L0Jciu+eHCbQzbWX2B+fd8ECJ7nyf2mJeTnS4Z4Z5VeZTzWYffonS2qxe sDJutIe0ar8UbxCuH/QvNRMzycEhiQoqOSL3Wdrnp/YIMqtw82BQsygrA 6qZ+fAOAZvTCJjEgP82SqA9ZqkKiddZWj32CZ/t3sKpoOMVWuZ9jpzbjt fLUBV/x4TgqhKUEYwJ+So0LSUQ+roq6K0j7txGyIgKSIXYrf+Qro29j/c y+hK5BgDpL5jubRc8dkqohIo2DP26UU4J2zKj7oELnCG3wa591HsPLzbj g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10781"; a="371264791" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,230,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="371264791" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2023 01:38:01 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10781"; a="761130712" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,230,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="761130712" Received: from haibo-optiplex-7090.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.132]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Jul 2023 01:37:54 -0700 From: Haibo Xu Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , Ricardo Koller , Vishal Annapurve , David Matlack , Vipin Sharma , Colton Lewis , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v6 08/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 16:41:34 +0800 Message-Id: <33097ed1a8e87beb6871cb6fa967dc9e0fae7adc.1690273969.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a function so we can check for a specific errno. This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv. Suggested-by: Andrew Jones Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 5 +++++ tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c index f72f1a522ff4..f8ebc058b191 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c @@ -79,6 +79,11 @@ bool check_supported_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, __u64 reg) return check_supported_feat_reg(vcpu, reg); } +bool check_reject_set(int err) +{ + return err == EPERM; +} + #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK) #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS 2 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index 853cbf470da2..1df94e8e9ed5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -104,6 +104,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); } +bool __weak check_reject_set(int err) +{ + return true; +} + #ifdef __aarch64__ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { @@ -222,7 +227,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) { reject_reg = true; ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, ®); - if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) { + if (ret != -1 || !check_reject_set(errno)) { printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno); print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id); putchar('\n');