Message ID | 3ac413f1d4adbac7db88a2cade97ded3b076c540.1708933498.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [v19,001/130] x86/virt/tdx: Rename _offset to _member for TD_SYSINFO_MAP() macro | expand |
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:26:44AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote: >From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> > >Because guest TD state is protected, exceptions in guest TDs can't be >intercepted. TDX VMM doesn't need to handle exceptions. >tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() handles NMI and machine check. Ignore NMI and tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() doesn't handle NMIs. >machine check and continue guest TD execution. > >For external interrupt, increment stats same to the VMX case. > >Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> >Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >--- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >index 0db80fa020d2..bdd74682b474 100644 >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >@@ -918,6 +918,25 @@ void tdx_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > vmx_handle_exception_irqoff(vcpu, tdexit_intr_info(vcpu)); > } > >+static int tdx_handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >+{ >+ u32 intr_info = tdexit_intr_info(vcpu); >+ >+ if (is_nmi(intr_info) || is_machine_check(intr_info)) >+ return 1; Add a comment in code as well. >+ >+ kvm_pr_unimpl("unexpected exception 0x%x(exit_reason 0x%llx qual 0x%lx)\n", >+ intr_info, >+ to_tdx(vcpu)->exit_reason.full, tdexit_exit_qual(vcpu)); >+ return -EFAULT; -EFAULT looks incorrect. >+} >+ >+static int tdx_handle_external_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >+{ >+ ++vcpu->stat.irq_exits; >+ return 1; >+} >+ > static int tdx_handle_triple_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN; >@@ -1390,6 +1409,10 @@ int tdx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t fastpath) > WARN_ON_ONCE(fastpath != EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE); > > switch (exit_reason.basic) { >+ case EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI: >+ return tdx_handle_exception(vcpu); >+ case EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT: >+ return tdx_handle_external_interrupt(vcpu); > case EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION: > return tdx_handle_ept_violation(vcpu); > case EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG: >-- >2.25.1 > >
On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:22:00PM +0800, Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:26:44AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote: > >From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> > > > >Because guest TD state is protected, exceptions in guest TDs can't be > >intercepted. TDX VMM doesn't need to handle exceptions. > >tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() handles NMI and machine check. Ignore NMI and > > tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() doesn't handle NMIs. Will it to tdx_handle_exception(). > >machine check and continue guest TD execution. > > > >For external interrupt, increment stats same to the VMX case. > > > >Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> > >Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > >--- > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > >diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c > >index 0db80fa020d2..bdd74682b474 100644 > >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c > >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c > >@@ -918,6 +918,25 @@ void tdx_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > vmx_handle_exception_irqoff(vcpu, tdexit_intr_info(vcpu)); > > } > > > >+static int tdx_handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > >+{ > >+ u32 intr_info = tdexit_intr_info(vcpu); > >+ > >+ if (is_nmi(intr_info) || is_machine_check(intr_info)) > >+ return 1; > > Add a comment in code as well. Sure. > >+ > >+ kvm_pr_unimpl("unexpected exception 0x%x(exit_reason 0x%llx qual 0x%lx)\n", > >+ intr_info, > >+ to_tdx(vcpu)->exit_reason.full, tdexit_exit_qual(vcpu)); > >+ return -EFAULT; > > -EFAULT looks incorrect. As this is unexpected exception, we should exit to to the user-space with KVM_EXIT_EXCEPTION. Then QEMU will abort with message.
On 4/4/2024 2:51 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:22:00PM +0800, > Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:26:44AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote: >>> From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> >>> >>> Because guest TD state is protected, exceptions in guest TDs can't be >>> intercepted. TDX VMM doesn't need to handle exceptions. >>> tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() handles NMI and machine check. Ignore NMI and >> tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() doesn't handle NMIs. > Will it to tdx_handle_exception(). I don't get why tdx_handle_exception()? NMI is handled in tdx_vcpu_enter_exit() prior to leaving the safety of noinstr, according to patch 098. https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/88920c598dcb55c15219642f27d0781af6d0c044.1708933498.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com/ @@ -837,6 +857,12 @@ static noinstr void tdx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct vcpu_tdx *tdx) WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_rebooting && (tdx->exit_reason.full & TDX_SW_ERROR) == TDX_SW_ERROR); + if ((u16)tdx->exit_reason.basic == EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI && + is_nmi(tdexit_intr_info(vcpu))) { + kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_NMI); + vmx_do_nmi_irqoff(); + kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu); + } guest_state_exit_irqoff(); } > > >>> machine check and continue guest TD execution. >>> >>> For external interrupt, increment stats same to the VMX case. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> >>> --- >>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >>> index 0db80fa020d2..bdd74682b474 100644 >>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c >>> @@ -918,6 +918,25 @@ void tdx_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >>> vmx_handle_exception_irqoff(vcpu, tdexit_intr_info(vcpu)); >>> } >>> >>> +static int tdx_handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) Should this function be named as tdx_handle_exception_nmi() since it's checking nmi as well? >>> +{ >>> + u32 intr_info = tdexit_intr_info(vcpu); >>> + >>> + if (is_nmi(intr_info) || is_machine_check(intr_info)) >>> + return 1; >>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 11:05:05AM +0800, Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > On 4/4/2024 2:51 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 04:22:00PM +0800, > > Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:26:44AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> > > > > > > > > Because guest TD state is protected, exceptions in guest TDs can't be > > > > intercepted. TDX VMM doesn't need to handle exceptions. > > > > tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() handles NMI and machine check. Ignore NMI and > > > tdx_handle_exit_irqoff() doesn't handle NMIs. > > Will it to tdx_handle_exception(). > > I don't get why tdx_handle_exception()? > > NMI is handled in tdx_vcpu_enter_exit() prior to leaving the safety of > noinstr, according to patch 098. > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/88920c598dcb55c15219642f27d0781af6d0c044.1708933498.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com/ > > @@ -837,6 +857,12 @@ static noinstr void tdx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct vcpu_tdx > *tdx) > WARN_ON_ONCE(!kvm_rebooting && > (tdx->exit_reason.full & TDX_SW_ERROR) == TDX_SW_ERROR); > > + if ((u16)tdx->exit_reason.basic == EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI && > + is_nmi(tdexit_intr_info(vcpu))) { > + kvm_before_interrupt(vcpu, KVM_HANDLING_NMI); > + vmx_do_nmi_irqoff(); > + kvm_after_interrupt(vcpu); > + } > guest_state_exit_irqoff(); > } You're correct. tdx_vcpu_enter_exit() handles EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI for NMI, and tdx_handle_exeption() ignores NMI case. The commit message should be updated with tdx_vcpu_enter_exit(). > > > > machine check and continue guest TD execution. > > > > > > > > For external interrupt, increment stats same to the VMX case. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com> > > > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > > > > --- > > > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c > > > > index 0db80fa020d2..bdd74682b474 100644 > > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c > > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c > > > > @@ -918,6 +918,25 @@ void tdx_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > > vmx_handle_exception_irqoff(vcpu, tdexit_intr_info(vcpu)); > > > > } > > > > > > > > +static int tdx_handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > Should this function be named as tdx_handle_exception_nmi() since it's > checking nmi as well? Ok, tdx_handle_exception_nmi() is more consistent.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c index 0db80fa020d2..bdd74682b474 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c @@ -918,6 +918,25 @@ void tdx_handle_exit_irqoff(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) vmx_handle_exception_irqoff(vcpu, tdexit_intr_info(vcpu)); } +static int tdx_handle_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + u32 intr_info = tdexit_intr_info(vcpu); + + if (is_nmi(intr_info) || is_machine_check(intr_info)) + return 1; + + kvm_pr_unimpl("unexpected exception 0x%x(exit_reason 0x%llx qual 0x%lx)\n", + intr_info, + to_tdx(vcpu)->exit_reason.full, tdexit_exit_qual(vcpu)); + return -EFAULT; +} + +static int tdx_handle_external_interrupt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) +{ + ++vcpu->stat.irq_exits; + return 1; +} + static int tdx_handle_triple_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN; @@ -1390,6 +1409,10 @@ int tdx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, fastpath_t fastpath) WARN_ON_ONCE(fastpath != EXIT_FASTPATH_NONE); switch (exit_reason.basic) { + case EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI: + return tdx_handle_exception(vcpu); + case EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT: + return tdx_handle_external_interrupt(vcpu); case EXIT_REASON_EPT_VIOLATION: return tdx_handle_ept_violation(vcpu); case EXIT_REASON_EPT_MISCONFIG: