Message ID | 4-v3-8db96837cdf9+784-vfio_modules_jgg@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Simplify the module and kconfig structure in vfio | expand |
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) > #include <asm/eeh.h> > #endif > > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev) > vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->users--; > mutex_unlock(&vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->lock); > } > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH) > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) So while this preserves the existing behavior, I wonder if checking CONFIG_EEH only would make more sense here.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 11:08:35PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) > > #include <asm/eeh.h> > > #endif > > > > @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev) > > vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->users--; > > mutex_unlock(&vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->lock); > > } > > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH) > > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) > > So while this preserves the existing behavior, I wonder if checking > CONFIG_EEH only would make more sense here. Yes, it does read better, done Thanks, Jason
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig index 86c381ceb9a1e9..d25b91adfd64cd 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/vfio/Kconfig @@ -20,11 +20,6 @@ config VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE depends on SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU default VFIO -config VFIO_SPAPR_EEH - tristate - depends on EEH && VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE - default VFIO - config VFIO_VIRQFD tristate select EVENTFD diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c index c8b8a7a03eae7e..6fe6b27475b75a 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ #include <linux/vgaarb.h> #include <linux/nospec.h> #include <linux/sched/mm.h> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH) +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) #include <asm/eeh.h> #endif @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ void vfio_pci_core_close_device(struct vfio_device *core_vdev) vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->users--; mutex_unlock(&vdev->sriov_pf_core_dev->vf_token->lock); } -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH) +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) eeh_dev_release(vdev->pdev); #endif vfio_pci_core_disable(vdev); @@ -710,7 +710,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_pci_core_close_device); void vfio_pci_core_finish_enable(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev) { vfio_pci_probe_mmaps(vdev); -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_SPAPR_EEH) +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EEH) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_IOMMU_SPAPR_TCE) eeh_dev_open(vdev->pdev); #endif
We don't need a kconfig symbol for this, just directly test CONFIG_EEH in the one remaining place that needs it. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> --- drivers/vfio/Kconfig | 5 ----- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)