From patchwork Thu May 25 07:38:31 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Xu, Haibo1" X-Patchwork-Id: 13254824 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656C9C7EE2E for ; Thu, 25 May 2023 07:35:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239667AbjEYHfn (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2023 03:35:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58248 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239368AbjEYHf3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2023 03:35:29 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759D1E47; Thu, 25 May 2023 00:35:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1685000127; x=1716536127; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9Xe9xj57Aj6Y+zbwY0sxx3rxGo9ZCYdqxL/t27YiGTk=; b=VAXle2GzU3Sie8OZUVIp54L4i4zM6CDTuWtKymjakf8sljb8hlqC20MN BV6jG19oO+8gN0M5ATPr1rriJXKceGYhn6RSMbjaukTwBCSsiKO2byoJi MWN4KywfpnTfzjPRmeRbz/aYyhemptz07aMWka5szAuiU4IoKRctLkQqQ 6/IG4F72sVpzU3EcCQRVcGgKpXYMJYJpXCUJeJVpHi+d8Vah5gNeJsefe Ar/sS8dX/jPD6zHRRHNzN5vNQ6hTeGDr/XAxxoJx+xM0Hld50lIGWbTTD v9qT1D14aZb7Zjst52w8+21euPrDstkPVPJisRiOBy0bd9BB0DapPAEH8 w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10720"; a="356164439" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,190,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="356164439" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 May 2023 00:34:14 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10720"; a="769775956" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,190,1681196400"; d="scan'208";a="769775956" Received: from haibo-optiplex-7090.sh.intel.com ([10.239.159.132]) by fmsmga008-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 May 2023 00:34:08 -0700 From: Haibo Xu Cc: xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Shuah Khan , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Zenghui Yu , David Matlack , Ben Gardon , Vipin Sharma , Colton Lewis , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: arm64: selftests: Finish generalizing get-reg-list Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:38:31 +0800 Message-Id: <87f433096a95d21bcefe440629e74cd2a2d44470.1684999824.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Andrew Jones Add some unfortunate #ifdeffery to ensure the common get-reg-list.c can be compiled and run with other architectures. The next architecture to support get-reg-list should now only need to provide $(ARCH_DIR)/get-reg-list.c where arch-specific print_reg() and vcpu_configs[] get defined. Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c index 69bb91087081..f6ad7991a812 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id) printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id); } +#ifdef __aarch64__ static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -120,6 +121,25 @@ static void finalize_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_reg_list *c) } } +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) +{ + struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; + + prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); + vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); + aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); + finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); + + return vcpu; +} +#else +static struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu_config_get_vcpu(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vm *vm) +{ + return __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); +} +#endif + static void check_supported(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { struct vcpu_reg_sublist *s; @@ -139,7 +159,6 @@ static bool print_filtered; static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) { - struct kvm_vcpu_init init = { .target = -1, }; int new_regs = 0, missing_regs = 0, i, n; int failed_get = 0, failed_set = 0, failed_reject = 0; struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; @@ -149,10 +168,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c) check_supported(c); vm = vm_create_barebones(); - prepare_vcpu_init(c, &init); - vcpu = __vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0); - aarch64_vcpu_setup(vcpu, &init); - finalize_vcpu(vcpu, c); + vcpu = vcpu_config_get_vcpu(c, vm); reg_list = vcpu_get_reg_list(vcpu);