Message ID | BLU436-SMTP143573E1F6485E5653198E9805B0@phx.gbl (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 2015-09-16 05:51, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Enhance allocate/free_vid to handle shadow vpid. > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> > --- > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > index 9ff6a3f..4956081 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c > @@ -4155,29 +4155,27 @@ static int alloc_identity_pagetable(struct kvm *kvm) > return r; > } > > -static void allocate_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) > +static int allocate_vpid(void) > { > - int vpid; > + int vpid = 0; Initialization is not pointless with the current code. > > - vmx->vpid = 0; > if (!enable_vpid) > - return; > + return 0; > spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock); > vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS); > - if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) { > - vmx->vpid = vpid; > + if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) > __set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); > - } > spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock); > + return vpid; You should return 0 also if vpid == VMX_NR_VPIDS. > } > > -static void free_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) > +static void free_vpid(int vpid) > { > if (!enable_vpid) You could already test for vpid == 0 here... > return; > spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock); > - if (vmx->vpid != 0) > - __clear_bit(vmx->vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); > + if (vpid != 0) ...then you could skip this. > + __clear_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); > spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock); > } > > @@ -8482,7 +8480,7 @@ static void vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (enable_pml) > vmx_disable_pml(vmx); > - free_vpid(vmx); > + free_vpid(vmx->vpid); > leave_guest_mode(vcpu); > vmx_load_vmcs01(vcpu); > free_nested(vmx); > @@ -8501,7 +8499,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id) > if (!vmx) > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > - allocate_vpid(vmx); > + vmx->vpid = allocate_vpid(); > > err = kvm_vcpu_init(&vmx->vcpu, kvm, id); > if (err) > @@ -8577,7 +8575,7 @@ free_msrs: > uninit_vcpu: > kvm_vcpu_uninit(&vmx->vcpu); > free_vcpu: > - free_vpid(vmx); > + free_vpid(vmx->vpid); > kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx); > return ERR_PTR(err); > } > Yes, this is what I had in mind. Jan
On 9/16/15 2:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2015-09-16 05:51, Wanpeng Li wrote: >> Enhance allocate/free_vid to handle shadow vpid. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> index 9ff6a3f..4956081 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c >> @@ -4155,29 +4155,27 @@ static int alloc_identity_pagetable(struct kvm *kvm) >> return r; >> } >> >> -static void allocate_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) >> +static int allocate_vpid(void) >> { >> - int vpid; >> + int vpid = 0; > Initialization is not pointless with the current code. > >> >> - vmx->vpid = 0; >> if (!enable_vpid) >> - return; >> + return 0; >> spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock); >> vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS); >> - if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) { >> - vmx->vpid = vpid; >> + if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) >> __set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); >> - } >> spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock); >> + return vpid; > You should return 0 also if vpid == VMX_NR_VPIDS. Agreed. > >> } >> >> -static void free_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) >> +static void free_vpid(int vpid) >> { >> if (!enable_vpid) > You could already test for vpid == 0 here... > >> return; >> spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock); >> - if (vmx->vpid != 0) >> - __clear_bit(vmx->vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); >> + if (vpid != 0) > ...then you could skip this. Agreed. > >> + __clear_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); >> spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock); >> } >> >> @@ -8482,7 +8480,7 @@ static void vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> >> if (enable_pml) >> vmx_disable_pml(vmx); >> - free_vpid(vmx); >> + free_vpid(vmx->vpid); >> leave_guest_mode(vcpu); >> vmx_load_vmcs01(vcpu); >> free_nested(vmx); >> @@ -8501,7 +8499,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id) >> if (!vmx) >> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> >> - allocate_vpid(vmx); >> + vmx->vpid = allocate_vpid(); >> >> err = kvm_vcpu_init(&vmx->vcpu, kvm, id); >> if (err) >> @@ -8577,7 +8575,7 @@ free_msrs: >> uninit_vcpu: >> kvm_vcpu_uninit(&vmx->vcpu); >> free_vcpu: >> - free_vpid(vmx); >> + free_vpid(vmx->vpid); >> kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx); >> return ERR_PTR(err); >> } >> > Yes, this is what I had in mind. Thanks for your review. :-) Regards, Wanpeng Li -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c index 9ff6a3f..4956081 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c @@ -4155,29 +4155,27 @@ static int alloc_identity_pagetable(struct kvm *kvm) return r; } -static void allocate_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) +static int allocate_vpid(void) { - int vpid; + int vpid = 0; - vmx->vpid = 0; if (!enable_vpid) - return; + return 0; spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock); vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS); - if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) { - vmx->vpid = vpid; + if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) __set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); - } spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock); + return vpid; } -static void free_vpid(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) +static void free_vpid(int vpid) { if (!enable_vpid) return; spin_lock(&vmx_vpid_lock); - if (vmx->vpid != 0) - __clear_bit(vmx->vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); + if (vpid != 0) + __clear_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap); spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock); } @@ -8482,7 +8480,7 @@ static void vmx_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) if (enable_pml) vmx_disable_pml(vmx); - free_vpid(vmx); + free_vpid(vmx->vpid); leave_guest_mode(vcpu); vmx_load_vmcs01(vcpu); free_nested(vmx); @@ -8501,7 +8499,7 @@ static struct kvm_vcpu *vmx_create_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int id) if (!vmx) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); - allocate_vpid(vmx); + vmx->vpid = allocate_vpid(); err = kvm_vcpu_init(&vmx->vcpu, kvm, id); if (err) @@ -8577,7 +8575,7 @@ free_msrs: uninit_vcpu: kvm_vcpu_uninit(&vmx->vcpu); free_vcpu: - free_vpid(vmx); + free_vpid(vmx->vpid); kmem_cache_free(kvm_vcpu_cache, vmx); return ERR_PTR(err); }
Enhance allocate/free_vid to handle shadow vpid. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> --- arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 24 +++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)