diff mbox series

[v2] KVM: X86: Grab KVM's srcu lock when accessing hv assist page

Message ID CANRm+CznPq3LQUyiXr8nA7uP5q+d8Ud-Ki-W7vPCo_BjDJtOSw@mail.gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v2] KVM: X86: Grab KVM's srcu lock when accessing hv assist page | expand

Commit Message

Wanpeng Li Feb. 14, 2020, 9:16 a.m. UTC 
From: wanpeng li <wanpengli@tencent.com>

For the duration of mapping eVMCS, it derefences ->memslots without holding
->srcu or ->slots_lock when accessing hv assist page. This patch fixes it by
moving nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow to prepare_guest_switch, where the SRCU
is already taken.

It can be reproduced by running kvm's evmcs_test selftest.

  =============================
  warning: suspicious rcu usage
  5.6.0-rc1+ #53 tainted: g        w ioe
  -----------------------------
  ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:623 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

  other info that might help us debug this:

   rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
  1 lock held by evmcs_test/8507:
   #0: ffff9ddd156d00d0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at:
kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x85/0x680 [kvm]

  stack backtrace:
  cpu: 6 pid: 8507 comm: evmcs_test tainted: g        w ioe     5.6.0-rc1+ #53
  hardware name: dell inc. optiplex 7040/0jctf8, bios 1.4.9 09/12/2016
  call trace:
   dump_stack+0x68/0x9b
   kvm_read_guest_cached+0x11d/0x150 [kvm]
   kvm_hv_get_assist_page+0x33/0x40 [kvm]
   nested_enlightened_vmentry+0x2c/0x60 [kvm_intel]
   nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld.part.52+0x32/0x1c0 [kvm_intel]
   nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow+0x439/0x680 [kvm_intel]
   vmx_vcpu_run+0x67a/0xe60 [kvm_intel]
   vcpu_enter_guest+0x35e/0x1bc0 [kvm]
   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x40b/0x670 [kvm]
   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x370/0x680 [kvm]
   ksys_ioctl+0x235/0x850
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
   do_syscall_64+0x77/0x780
   entry_syscall_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--
2.7.4

Comments

Paolo Bonzini Feb. 14, 2020, 9:27 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 14/02/20 10:16, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: wanpeng li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> 
> For the duration of mapping eVMCS, it derefences ->memslots without holding
> ->srcu or ->slots_lock when accessing hv assist page. This patch fixes it by
> moving nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow to prepare_guest_switch, where the SRCU
> is already taken.

Looks good, but I'd like an extra review from Sean or Vitaly.

We also should add a WARN_ON_ONCE that replaces the previous location of
the "if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)", but I can do that myself.

Thanks,

Paolo

> It can be reproduced by running kvm's evmcs_test selftest.
> 
>   =============================
>   warning: suspicious rcu usage
>   5.6.0-rc1+ #53 tainted: g        w ioe
>   -----------------------------
>   ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:623 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> 
>   other info that might help us debug this:
> 
>    rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
>   1 lock held by evmcs_test/8507:
>    #0: ffff9ddd156d00d0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at:
> kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x85/0x680 [kvm]
> 
>   stack backtrace:
>   cpu: 6 pid: 8507 comm: evmcs_test tainted: g        w ioe     5.6.0-rc1+ #53
>   hardware name: dell inc. optiplex 7040/0jctf8, bios 1.4.9 09/12/2016
>   call trace:
>    dump_stack+0x68/0x9b
>    kvm_read_guest_cached+0x11d/0x150 [kvm]
>    kvm_hv_get_assist_page+0x33/0x40 [kvm]
>    nested_enlightened_vmentry+0x2c/0x60 [kvm_intel]
>    nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld.part.52+0x32/0x1c0 [kvm_intel]
>    nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow+0x439/0x680 [kvm_intel]
>    vmx_vcpu_run+0x67a/0xe60 [kvm_intel]
>    vcpu_enter_guest+0x35e/0x1bc0 [kvm]
>    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x40b/0x670 [kvm]
>    kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x370/0x680 [kvm]
>    ksys_ioctl+0x235/0x850
>    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
>    do_syscall_64+0x77/0x780
>    entry_syscall_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 9a66648..6bd6ca4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -1214,6 +1214,9 @@ void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> 
>      vmx_set_host_fs_gs(host_state, fs_sel, gs_sel, fs_base, gs_base);
>      vmx->guest_state_loaded = true;
> +
> +    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
> +        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
>  }
> 
>  static void vmx_prepare_switch_to_host(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> @@ -6480,9 +6483,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>          vmcs_write32(PLE_WINDOW, vmx->ple_window);
>      }
> 
> -    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
> -        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
> -
>      if (kvm_register_is_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSP))
>          vmcs_writel(GUEST_RSP, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP]);
>      if (kvm_register_is_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RIP))
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Sean Christopherson Feb. 14, 2020, 9:33 p.m. UTC | #2 
The subject shoud be rewritten to simply states that the vmcs12->shadow
sync is being.  The changelog can explain the motiviation, but a one-line
git log should clearly reveal that this affects the shadow VMCS.

Subsystem should also be "KVM: nVMX:"

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 14/02/20 10:16, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > From: wanpeng li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> > 
> > For the duration of mapping eVMCS, it derefences ->memslots without holding
> > ->srcu or ->slots_lock when accessing hv assist page. This patch fixes it by
> > moving nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow to prepare_guest_switch, where the SRCU
> > is already taken.
> 
> Looks good, but I'd like an extra review from Sean or Vitaly.
> 
> We also should add a WARN_ON_ONCE that replaces the previous location of
> the "if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)", but I can do that myself.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Paolo
> 
> > It can be reproduced by running kvm's evmcs_test selftest.
> > 
> >   =============================
> >   warning: suspicious rcu usage
> >   5.6.0-rc1+ #53 tainted: g        w ioe
> >   -----------------------------
> >   ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:623 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> > 
> >   other info that might help us debug this:
> > 
> >    rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> >   1 lock held by evmcs_test/8507:
> >    #0: ffff9ddd156d00d0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at:
> > kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x85/0x680 [kvm]
> > 
> >   stack backtrace:
> >   cpu: 6 pid: 8507 comm: evmcs_test tainted: g        w ioe     5.6.0-rc1+ #53
> >   hardware name: dell inc. optiplex 7040/0jctf8, bios 1.4.9 09/12/2016
> >   call trace:
> >    dump_stack+0x68/0x9b
> >    kvm_read_guest_cached+0x11d/0x150 [kvm]
> >    kvm_hv_get_assist_page+0x33/0x40 [kvm]
> >    nested_enlightened_vmentry+0x2c/0x60 [kvm_intel]
> >    nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld.part.52+0x32/0x1c0 [kvm_intel]
> >    nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow+0x439/0x680 [kvm_intel]
> >    vmx_vcpu_run+0x67a/0xe60 [kvm_intel]
> >    vcpu_enter_guest+0x35e/0x1bc0 [kvm]
> >    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x40b/0x670 [kvm]
> >    kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x370/0x680 [kvm]
> >    ksys_ioctl+0x235/0x850
> >    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> >    do_syscall_64+0x77/0x780
> >    entry_syscall_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index 9a66648..6bd6ca4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -1214,6 +1214,9 @@ void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > 
> >      vmx_set_host_fs_gs(host_state, fs_sel, gs_sel, fs_base, gs_base);
> >      vmx->guest_state_loaded = true;
> > +
> > +    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
> > +        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);

This needs to be above the short circuit check on guest_state_loaded, e.g.:

	if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
		nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);

	if (vmx->guest_state_loaded)
		return;

> >  }
> > 
> >  static void vmx_prepare_switch_to_host(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> > @@ -6480,9 +6483,6 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >          vmcs_write32(PLE_WINDOW, vmx->ple_window);
> >      }
> > 
> > -    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
> > -        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
> > -
> >      if (kvm_register_is_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSP))
> >          vmcs_writel(GUEST_RSP, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP]);
> >      if (kvm_register_is_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RIP))
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> > 
>
Wanpeng Li Feb. 17, 2020, 1:16 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 05:33, Sean Christopherson
<sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> The subject shoud be rewritten to simply states that the vmcs12->shadow
> sync is being.  The changelog can explain the motiviation, but a one-line
> git log should clearly reveal that this affects the shadow VMCS.
>
> Subsystem should also be "KVM: nVMX:"
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:27:12AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 14/02/20 10:16, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > > From: wanpeng li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> > >
> > > For the duration of mapping eVMCS, it derefences ->memslots without holding
> > > ->srcu or ->slots_lock when accessing hv assist page. This patch fixes it by
> > > moving nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow to prepare_guest_switch, where the SRCU
> > > is already taken.
> >
> > Looks good, but I'd like an extra review from Sean or Vitaly.
> >
> > We also should add a WARN_ON_ONCE that replaces the previous location of
> > the "if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)", but I can do that myself.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Paolo
> >
> > > It can be reproduced by running kvm's evmcs_test selftest.
> > >
> > >   =============================
> > >   warning: suspicious rcu usage
> > >   5.6.0-rc1+ #53 tainted: g        w ioe
> > >   -----------------------------
> > >   ./include/linux/kvm_host.h:623 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
> > >
> > >   other info that might help us debug this:
> > >
> > >    rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
> > >   1 lock held by evmcs_test/8507:
> > >    #0: ffff9ddd156d00d0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}, at:
> > > kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x85/0x680 [kvm]
> > >
> > >   stack backtrace:
> > >   cpu: 6 pid: 8507 comm: evmcs_test tainted: g        w ioe     5.6.0-rc1+ #53
> > >   hardware name: dell inc. optiplex 7040/0jctf8, bios 1.4.9 09/12/2016
> > >   call trace:
> > >    dump_stack+0x68/0x9b
> > >    kvm_read_guest_cached+0x11d/0x150 [kvm]
> > >    kvm_hv_get_assist_page+0x33/0x40 [kvm]
> > >    nested_enlightened_vmentry+0x2c/0x60 [kvm_intel]
> > >    nested_vmx_handle_enlightened_vmptrld.part.52+0x32/0x1c0 [kvm_intel]
> > >    nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow+0x439/0x680 [kvm_intel]
> > >    vmx_vcpu_run+0x67a/0xe60 [kvm_intel]
> > >    vcpu_enter_guest+0x35e/0x1bc0 [kvm]
> > >    kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x40b/0x670 [kvm]
> > >    kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x370/0x680 [kvm]
> > >    ksys_ioctl+0x235/0x850
> > >    __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20
> > >    do_syscall_64+0x77/0x780
> > >    entry_syscall_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > index 9a66648..6bd6ca4 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > > @@ -1214,6 +1214,9 @@ void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > >
> > >      vmx_set_host_fs_gs(host_state, fs_sel, gs_sel, fs_base, gs_base);
> > >      vmx->guest_state_loaded = true;
> > > +
> > > +    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
> > > +        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
>
> This needs to be above the short circuit check on guest_state_loaded, e.g.:
>
>         if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
>                 nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
>
>         if (vmx->guest_state_loaded)
>                 return;

Agreed, do it in new version.

    Wanpeng
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 9a66648..6bd6ca4 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -1214,6 +1214,9 @@  void vmx_prepare_switch_to_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

     vmx_set_host_fs_gs(host_state, fs_sel, gs_sel, fs_base, gs_base);
     vmx->guest_state_loaded = true;
+
+    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
+        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
 }

 static void vmx_prepare_switch_to_host(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
@@ -6480,9 +6483,6 @@  static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
         vmcs_write32(PLE_WINDOW, vmx->ple_window);
     }

-    if (vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync)
-        nested_sync_vmcs12_to_shadow(vcpu);
-
     if (kvm_register_is_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RSP))
         vmcs_writel(GUEST_RSP, vcpu->arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RSP]);
     if (kvm_register_is_dirty(vcpu, VCPU_REGS_RIP))