Message ID | ZO/Te6LU1ENf58ZW@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] Please pull IOMMUFD subsystem changes | expand |
The pull request you sent on Wed, 30 Aug 2023 20:40:43 -0300:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgg/iommufd.git tags/for-linus-iommufd
has been merged into torvalds/linux.git:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/4debf77169ee459c46ec70e13dc503bc25efd7d2
Thank you!
On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:40, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote: > > This includes a shared branch with VFIO: > > - Enhance VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO so it can work with iommufd > FDs, not just group FDs. [...] So because I had pulled the vfio changes independently with their own merge message, I ended up editing out all the commentary you had about the vfio side of the changes. Which is kind of sad, since you arguably put some more information and effort into it than Alex had done in his vfio pull request. But the vfio parts just weren't part of the merge any more. I did put a link to your pull request in the commit, so people can find this info, but I thought I'd mention how I ruthlessly edited down the merge commit message to just the parts that were new to the merge. I appreciate the extra background, even if I then decided that by the time I merged your part, some of it was "old news" and not actually about what I merged when I pulled your branch. .. and if I had realized when I merged the vfio parts, I probably could have added your commentary to that merge. Oh well. Linus
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 08:59:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 30 Aug 2023 at 16:40, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > This includes a shared branch with VFIO: > > > > - Enhance VFIO_DEVICE_GET_PCI_HOT_RESET_INFO so it can work with iommufd > > FDs, not just group FDs. [...] > > So because I had pulled the vfio changes independently with their own > merge message, I ended up editing out all the commentary you had about > the vfio side of the changes. > > Which is kind of sad, since you arguably put some more information and > effort into it than Alex had done in his vfio pull request. But the > vfio parts just weren't part of the merge any more. > > I did put a link to your pull request in the commit, so people can > find this info, but I thought I'd mention how I ruthlessly edited down > the merge commit message to just the parts that were new to the merge. > > I appreciate the extra background, even if I then decided that by the > time I merged your part, some of it was "old news" and not actually > about what I merged when I pulled your branch. > > .. and if I had realized when I merged the vfio parts, I probably > could have added your commentary to that merge. Oh well. Thanks, I've been trying to make these PR emails sort of a 'state of the union' for the project as there are a lot of collaborators involved right now. The vfio parts are logically part of the iommufd work. Jason