Message ID | 1448593953-12364-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
Headers | show |
On Friday, November 27, 2015 11:12:33 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > From: Liu Jiang <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > > Commit 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support > PCI host bridge") converted x86 to use the common interface > acpi_pci_root_create, but the conversion missed on code piece in > arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c, which causes regression on some legacy > AMD platforms as reported by Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>. > The root causes is that acpi_pci_root_create() fails to insert > host bridge resources into iomem_resource/ioport_resource because > x86_pci_root_bus_resources() has already inserted those resources. > So change x86_pci_root_bus_resources() to not insert resources into > iomem_resource/ioport_resource. > > Fixes: 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge") > Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > Reported-and-tested-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> > Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> > Cc: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> > Cc: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl> What exactly has changed between this version and the previous one? > --- > arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c | 13 ++----------- > drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c > index 7bcf06a7cd12..6eb3c8af96e2 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c > @@ -50,18 +50,9 @@ void x86_pci_root_bus_resources(int bus, struct list_head *resources) > if (!found) > pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); > > - list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) { > - struct resource *res; > - struct resource *root; > + list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) > + pci_add_resource(resources, &root_res->res); > > - res = &root_res->res; > - pci_add_resource(resources, res); > - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) > - root = &ioport_resource; > - else > - root = &iomem_resource; > - insert_resource(root, res); > - } > return; > > default_resources: > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > index 850d7bf0c873..ae3fe4e64203 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > @@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static void pci_acpi_root_add_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info) > else > continue; > > + /* > + * Some legacy x86 host bridge drivers use iomem_resource and > + * ioport_resource as default resource pool, skip it. > + */ > + if (res == root) > + continue; > + > conflict = insert_resource_conflict(root, res); > if (conflict) { > dev_info(&info->bridge->dev, >
On 2015/11/28 0:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, November 27, 2015 11:12:33 AM Jiang Liu wrote: >> From: Liu Jiang <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> >> >> Commit 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support >> PCI host bridge") converted x86 to use the common interface >> acpi_pci_root_create, but the conversion missed on code piece in >> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c, which causes regression on some legacy >> AMD platforms as reported by Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>. >> The root causes is that acpi_pci_root_create() fails to insert >> host bridge resources into iomem_resource/ioport_resource because >> x86_pci_root_bus_resources() has already inserted those resources. >> So change x86_pci_root_bus_resources() to not insert resources into >> iomem_resource/ioport_resource. >> >> Fixes: 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge") >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> >> Reported-and-tested-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> >> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> >> Cc: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> >> Cc: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl> > > What exactly has changed between this version and the previous one? Hi Rafael, I have removed following changes against the original patch posted at Nov 16. bus); /* already added by acpi ? */ - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, &info->resources) if (window->res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS) { found = true; break; } - if (!found) pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); And I only refined the commit message based on the test patch I sent to Authur as an attachment at Nov 25. Thanks, Gerry > > >> --- >> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c | 13 ++----------- >> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 7 +++++++ >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c >> index 7bcf06a7cd12..6eb3c8af96e2 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c >> @@ -50,18 +50,9 @@ void x86_pci_root_bus_resources(int bus, struct list_head *resources) >> if (!found) >> pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); >> >> - list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) { >> - struct resource *res; >> - struct resource *root; >> + list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) >> + pci_add_resource(resources, &root_res->res); >> >> - res = &root_res->res; >> - pci_add_resource(resources, res); >> - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) >> - root = &ioport_resource; >> - else >> - root = &iomem_resource; >> - insert_resource(root, res); >> - } >> return; >> >> default_resources: >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> index 850d7bf0c873..ae3fe4e64203 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c >> @@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static void pci_acpi_root_add_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info) >> else >> continue; >> >> + /* >> + * Some legacy x86 host bridge drivers use iomem_resource and >> + * ioport_resource as default resource pool, skip it. >> + */ >> + if (res == root) >> + continue; >> + >> conflict = insert_resource_conflict(root, res); >> if (conflict) { >> dev_info(&info->bridge->dev, >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Monday, November 30, 2015 09:20:06 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2015/11/28 0:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, November 27, 2015 11:12:33 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > >> From: Liu Jiang <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > >> > >> Commit 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support > >> PCI host bridge") converted x86 to use the common interface > >> acpi_pci_root_create, but the conversion missed on code piece in > >> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c, which causes regression on some legacy > >> AMD platforms as reported by Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>. > >> The root causes is that acpi_pci_root_create() fails to insert > >> host bridge resources into iomem_resource/ioport_resource because > >> x86_pci_root_bus_resources() has already inserted those resources. > >> So change x86_pci_root_bus_resources() to not insert resources into > >> iomem_resource/ioport_resource. > >> > >> Fixes: 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge") > >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > >> Reported-and-tested-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> > >> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> > >> Cc: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> > >> Cc: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl> > > > > What exactly has changed between this version and the previous one? > Hi Rafael, > I have removed following changes against the original patch > posted at Nov 16. > bus); > > /* already added by acpi ? */ > - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, &info->resources) > if (window->res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS) { > found = true; > break; > } > - > if (!found) > pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); > > And I only refined the commit message based on the test patch > I sent to Authur as an attachment at Nov 25. OK, thanks. Keith, Hans, can you test this version too please? Bjorn, any more comments from you on this one? > >> --- > >> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c | 13 ++----------- > >> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 7 +++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c > >> index 7bcf06a7cd12..6eb3c8af96e2 100644 > >> --- a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c > >> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c > >> @@ -50,18 +50,9 @@ void x86_pci_root_bus_resources(int bus, struct list_head *resources) > >> if (!found) > >> pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); > >> > >> - list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) { > >> - struct resource *res; > >> - struct resource *root; > >> + list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) > >> + pci_add_resource(resources, &root_res->res); > >> > >> - res = &root_res->res; > >> - pci_add_resource(resources, res); > >> - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) > >> - root = &ioport_resource; > >> - else > >> - root = &iomem_resource; > >> - insert_resource(root, res); > >> - } > >> return; > >> > >> default_resources: > >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > >> index 850d7bf0c873..ae3fe4e64203 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c > >> @@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static void pci_acpi_root_add_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info) > >> else > >> continue; > >> > >> + /* > >> + * Some legacy x86 host bridge drivers use iomem_resource and > >> + * ioport_resource as default resource pool, skip it. > >> + */ > >> + if (res == root) > >> + continue; > >> + > >> conflict = insert_resource_conflict(root, res); > >> if (conflict) { > >> dev_info(&info->bridge->dev, > >> > > Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:11:14AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, November 30, 2015 09:20:06 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > > On 2015/11/28 0:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Friday, November 27, 2015 11:12:33 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > > >> From: Liu Jiang <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > > >> > > >> Commit 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support > > >> PCI host bridge") converted x86 to use the common interface > > >> acpi_pci_root_create, but the conversion missed on code piece in > > >> arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c, which causes regression on some legacy > > >> AMD platforms as reported by Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>. > > >> The root causes is that acpi_pci_root_create() fails to insert > > >> host bridge resources into iomem_resource/ioport_resource because > > >> x86_pci_root_bus_resources() has already inserted those resources. > > >> So change x86_pci_root_bus_resources() to not insert resources into > > >> iomem_resource/ioport_resource. > > >> > > >> Fixes: 4d6b4e69a245 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common interface to support PCI host bridge") > > >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> > > >> Reported-and-tested-by: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> > > >> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> > > >> Cc: Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net> > > >> Cc: Hans de Bruin <jmdebruin@xmsnet.nl> > > > > > > What exactly has changed between this version and the previous one? > > Hi Rafael, > > I have removed following changes against the original patch > > posted at Nov 16. > > bus); > > > > /* already added by acpi ? */ > > - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > > + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, &info->resources) > > if (window->res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS) { > > found = true; > > break; > > } > > - > > if (!found) > > pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); > > > > And I only refined the commit message based on the test patch > > I sent to Authur as an attachment at Nov 25. > > OK, thanks. > > Keith, Hans, can you test this version too please? > > Bjorn, any more comments from you on this one? I haven't reviewed it in detail, but I don't have any objections to it. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 03:11:14AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, November 30, 2015 09:20:06 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > I have removed following changes against the original patch > > posted at Nov 16. > > bus); > > > > /* already added by acpi ? */ > > - resource_list_for_each_entry(window, resources) > > + resource_list_for_each_entry(window, &info->resources) > > if (window->res->flags & IORESOURCE_BUS) { > > found = true; > > break; > > } > > - > > if (!found) > > pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); > > > > And I only refined the commit message based on the test patch > > I sent to Authur as an attachment at Nov 25. > > OK, thanks. > > Keith, Hans, can you test this version too please? Thanks, works for me! Tested-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> > Bjorn, any more comments from you on this one? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 11/30/2015 03:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, November 30, 2015 09:20:06 AM Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 2015/11/28 0:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: ... >> >> And I only refined the commit message based on the test patch >> I sent to Authur as an attachment at Nov 25. > > OK, thanks. > > Keith, Hans, can you test this version too please? > This version of the patch works on my laptop too.
On Tuesday, December 01, 2015 08:00:50 PM Hans de Bruin wrote: > On 11/30/2015 03:11 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, November 30, 2015 09:20:06 AM Jiang Liu wrote: > >> On 2015/11/28 0:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > ... > >> > >> And I only refined the commit message based on the test patch > >> I sent to Authur as an attachment at Nov 25. > > > > OK, thanks. > > > > Keith, Hans, can you test this version too please? > > > > This version of the patch works on my laptop too. Thank you all for verifying! The patch is in my queue for 4.4-rc4. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c index 7bcf06a7cd12..6eb3c8af96e2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c +++ b/arch/x86/pci/bus_numa.c @@ -50,18 +50,9 @@ void x86_pci_root_bus_resources(int bus, struct list_head *resources) if (!found) pci_add_resource(resources, &info->busn); - list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) { - struct resource *res; - struct resource *root; + list_for_each_entry(root_res, &info->resources, list) + pci_add_resource(resources, &root_res->res); - res = &root_res->res; - pci_add_resource(resources, res); - if (res->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) - root = &ioport_resource; - else - root = &iomem_resource; - insert_resource(root, res); - } return; default_resources: diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c index 850d7bf0c873..ae3fe4e64203 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c @@ -768,6 +768,13 @@ static void pci_acpi_root_add_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info) else continue; + /* + * Some legacy x86 host bridge drivers use iomem_resource and + * ioport_resource as default resource pool, skip it. + */ + if (res == root) + continue; + conflict = insert_resource_conflict(root, res); if (conflict) { dev_info(&info->bridge->dev,