Message ID | 1455511921-18063-1-git-send-email-chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Delegated to: | Rafael Wysocki |
Headers | show |
On Monday, February 15, 2016 12:52:01 PM Chen Fan wrote: > Per the x86-specific footnote to PCI spec r3.0, sec 6.2.4, the value 255 in > the Interrupt Line register means "unknown" or "no connection." > Previously, when we couldn't derive an IRQ from the _PRT, we fell back to > using the value from Interrupt Line as an IRQ. It's questionable whether > we should do that at all, but the spec clearly suggests we shouldn't do it > for the value 255 on x86. > > Calling request_irq() with IRQ 255 may succeed, but the driver won't > receive any interrupts. Or, if IRQ 255 is shared with another device, it > may succeed, and the driver's ISR will be called at random times when the > *other* device interrupts. Or it may fail if another device is using IRQ > 255 with incompatible flags. What we *want* is for request_irq() to fail > predictably so the driver can fall back to polling. > > On x86, assume 255 in the Interrupt Line means the INTx line is not > connected. In that case, set dev->irq to IRQ_NOTCONNECTED so request_irq() > will fail gracefully with -ENOTCONN. > > We found this problem on a system where Secure Boot firmware assigned > Interrupt Line 255 to an i801_smbus device and another device was already > using MSI-X IRQ 255. This was in v3.10, where i801_probe() fails if > request_irq() fails: > > i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: enabling device (0140 -> 0143) > i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: can't derive routing for PCI INT C > i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C: no GSI > genirq: Flags mismatch irq 255. 00000080 (i801_smbus) vs. 00000000 (megasa) > CPU: 0 PID: 2487 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 3.10.0-229.el7.x86_64 #1 > Hardware name: FUJITSU PRIMEQUEST 2800E2/D3736, BIOS PRIMEQUEST 2000 Serie5 > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x19/0x1b > __setup_irq+0x54a/0x570 > request_threaded_irq+0xcc/0x170 > i801_probe+0x32f/0x508 [i2c_i801] > local_pci_probe+0x45/0xa0 > i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: Failed to allocate irq 255: -16 > i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16 > > After aeb8a3d16ae0 ("i2c: i801: Check if interrupts are disabled"), > i801_probe() will fall back to polling if request_irq() fails. But we > still need this patch because request_irq() may succeed or fail depending > on other devices in the system. If request_irq() fails, i801_smbus will > work by falling back to polling, but if it succeeds, i801_smbus won't work > because it expects interrupts that it may not receive. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Fan <chen.fan.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Applied, thanks! Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c index d30184c..4e18bc4 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_irq.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include <linux/pci.h> #include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> #define PREFIX "ACPI: " @@ -387,6 +388,23 @@ static inline int acpi_isa_register_gsi(struct pci_dev *dev) } #endif +static inline bool acpi_pci_irq_valid(struct pci_dev *dev, u8 pin) +{ +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 + /* + * On x86 irq line 0xff means "unknown" or "no connection" + * (PCI 3.0, Section 6.2.4, footnote on page 223). + */ + if (dev->irq == 0xff) { + dev->irq = IRQ_NOTCONNECTED; + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: not connected\n", + pin_name(pin)); + return false; + } +#endif + return true; +} + int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) { struct acpi_prt_entry *entry; @@ -431,11 +449,14 @@ int acpi_pci_irq_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) } else gsi = -1; - /* - * No IRQ known to the ACPI subsystem - maybe the BIOS / - * driver reported one, then use it. Exit in any case. - */ if (gsi < 0) { + /* + * No IRQ known to the ACPI subsystem - maybe the BIOS / + * driver reported one, then use it. Exit in any case. + */ + if (!acpi_pci_irq_valid(dev, pin)) + return 0; + if (acpi_isa_register_gsi(dev)) dev_warn(&dev->dev, "PCI INT %c: no GSI\n", pin_name(pin)); diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h index cb30edb..12f7da4 100644 --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h @@ -125,6 +125,16 @@ struct irqaction { extern irqreturn_t no_action(int cpl, void *dev_id); +/* + * If a (PCI) device interrupt is not connected we set dev->irq to + * IRQ_NOTCONNECTED. This causes request_irq() to fail with -ENOTCONN, so we + * can distingiush that case from other error returns. + * + * 0x80000000 is guaranteed to be outside the available range of interrupts + * and easy to distinguish from other possible incorrect values. + */ +#define IRQ_NOTCONNECTED (1U << 31) + extern int __must_check request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, irq_handler_t thread_fn, diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 8411872..e79e60f 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -1609,6 +1609,9 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, struct irq_desc *desc; int retval; + if (irq == IRQ_NOTCONNECTED) + return -ENOTCONN; + /* * Sanity-check: shared interrupts must pass in a real dev-ID, * otherwise we'll have trouble later trying to figure out @@ -1699,9 +1702,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_threaded_irq); int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id) { - struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); + struct irq_desc *desc; int ret; + if (irq == IRQ_NOTCONNECTED) + return -ENOTCONN; + + desc = irq_to_desc(irq); if (!desc) return -EINVAL;