Message ID | 20090406182723.927683000@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
applied (and cpufreq@vger.kernel.org added to cc) thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center On Mon, 6 Apr 2009, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com wrote: > Change structure name to make the code cleaner and simpler. No > functionality change in this patch. > > Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> > --- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 42 +++++++++++++-------------- > 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > index 19f6b9d..340bdbe 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > @@ -241,23 +241,23 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask) > return cmd.val; > } > > -struct perf_cur { > +struct perf_pair { > union { > struct { > u32 lo; > u32 hi; > } split; > u64 whole; > - } aperf_cur, mperf_cur; > + } aperf, mperf; > }; > > > static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur) > { > - struct perf_cur *cur = _cur; > + struct perf_pair *cur = _cur; > > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi); > - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi); > + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi); > + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi); > > wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0); > wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0); > @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur) > static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > unsigned int cpu) > { > - struct perf_cur cur; > + struct perf_pair cur; > unsigned int perf_percent; > unsigned int retval; > > @@ -294,39 +294,37 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get > * an approximate value. > */ > - if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) { > + if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) { > int shift_count; > u32 h; > > - h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi); > + h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi); > shift_count = fls(h); > > - cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; > - cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; > + cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count; > + cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count; > } > > - if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) { > + if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) { > int shift_count = 7; > - cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count; > - cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count; > + cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count; > + cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count; > } > > - if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo) > - perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) / > - cur.mperf_cur.split.lo; > + if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo) > + perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo; > else > perf_percent = 0; > > #else > - if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) { > + if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) { > int shift_count = 7; > - cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; > - cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; > + cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count; > + cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count; > } > > - if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole) > - perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) / > - cur.mperf_cur.whole; > + if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole) > + perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole; > else > perf_percent = 0; > > -- > 1.6.0.6 > > -- > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index 19f6b9d..340bdbe 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -241,23 +241,23 @@ static u32 get_cur_val(const struct cpumask *mask) return cmd.val; } -struct perf_cur { +struct perf_pair { union { struct { u32 lo; u32 hi; } split; u64 whole; - } aperf_cur, mperf_cur; + } aperf, mperf; }; static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur) { - struct perf_cur *cur = _cur; + struct perf_pair *cur = _cur; - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf_cur.split.lo, cur->aperf_cur.split.hi); - rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf_cur.split.lo, cur->mperf_cur.split.hi); + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, cur->aperf.split.lo, cur->aperf.split.hi); + rdmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, cur->mperf.split.lo, cur->mperf.split.hi); wrmsr(MSR_IA32_APERF, 0, 0); wrmsr(MSR_IA32_MPERF, 0, 0); @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static long read_measured_perf_ctrs(void *_cur) static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) { - struct perf_cur cur; + struct perf_pair cur; unsigned int perf_percent; unsigned int retval; @@ -294,39 +294,37 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, * Get an approximate value. Return failure in case we cannot get * an approximate value. */ - if (unlikely(cur.aperf_cur.split.hi || cur.mperf_cur.split.hi)) { + if (unlikely(cur.aperf.split.hi || cur.mperf.split.hi)) { int shift_count; u32 h; - h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf_cur.split.hi, cur.mperf_cur.split.hi); + h = max_t(u32, cur.aperf.split.hi, cur.mperf.split.hi); shift_count = fls(h); - cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; - cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; + cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count; + cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count; } - if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.split.lo) { + if (((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.split.lo) { int shift_count = 7; - cur.aperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count; - cur.mperf_cur.split.lo >>= shift_count; + cur.aperf.split.lo >>= shift_count; + cur.mperf.split.lo >>= shift_count; } - if (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo && cur.mperf_cur.split.lo) - perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.split.lo * 100) / - cur.mperf_cur.split.lo; + if (cur.aperf.split.lo && cur.mperf.split.lo) + perf_percent = (cur.aperf.split.lo * 100) / cur.mperf.split.lo; else perf_percent = 0; #else - if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf_cur.whole)) { + if (unlikely(((unsigned long)(-1) / 100) < cur.aperf.whole)) { int shift_count = 7; - cur.aperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; - cur.mperf_cur.whole >>= shift_count; + cur.aperf.whole >>= shift_count; + cur.mperf.whole >>= shift_count; } - if (cur.aperf_cur.whole && cur.mperf_cur.whole) - perf_percent = (cur.aperf_cur.whole * 100) / - cur.mperf_cur.whole; + if (cur.aperf.whole && cur.mperf.whole) + perf_percent = (cur.aperf.whole * 100) / cur.mperf.whole; else perf_percent = 0;
Change structure name to make the code cleaner and simpler. No functionality change in this patch. Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 42 +++++++++++++-------------- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)