diff mbox

[resend] acpi processor: simplify needlessly complex printk

Message ID 200908171451.44732.elendil@planet.nl (mailing list archive)
State RFC, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Frans Pop Aug. 17, 2009, 12:51 p.m. UTC
Why use three printk statements if one will do?
Also makes it easier to grep for the string.

Signed-off-by: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
index 84e0f3c..b8fb74a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
@@ -772,12 +772,11 @@  static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device)
 	if (result)
 		printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Create sysfs link\n");
 
-	if (pr->flags.throttling) {
-		printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (supports",
-		       acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device));
-		printk(" %d throttling states", pr->throttling.state_count);
-		printk(")\n");
-	}
+	if (pr->flags.throttling)
+		printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX
+			"%s [%s] (supports %d throttling states)\n",
+			acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device),
+			pr->throttling.state_count);
 
       end: