From patchwork Mon Nov 12 09:46:42 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chao Fan X-Patchwork-Id: 10678389 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B524214DB for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E7629CFE for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 985D729D4B; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2336329CFE for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727297AbeKLTka (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:40:30 -0500 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:28580 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726161AbeKLTk2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:40:28 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,368,1503331200"; d="scan'208";a="47945959" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2018 17:47:55 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057D14B71EA6; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:47:54 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.local (10.167.225.56) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:47:59 +0800 From: Chao Fan To: , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH v11 2/5] x86/boot: Add bios_get_rsdp_addr() to search RSDP in memory Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:46:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20181112094645.4879-3-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181112094645.4879-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20181112094645.4879-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.56] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 057D14B71EA6.AB53B X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Imitate ACPI code to search RSDP pointer from memory. Walk memory and check the signature until get the RSDP signature. Based on acpi_tb_scan_memory_for_rsdp() and acpi_find_root_pointer(). If didn't get RSDP from EFI table, will run this function. Used for later patch to dig out SRAT table and get the memory information. And figure out the immovable memory regions to avoid KASLR extracts kernel on movable memory, slove the conflict between KASLR and movable_node feature. Signed-off-by: Chao Fan --- arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c index 56b54b0e0889..50fa65cf824d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpitb.c @@ -94,3 +94,109 @@ static void efi_get_rsdp_addr(acpi_physical_address *rsdp_addr) } #endif } + +static u8 compute_checksum(u8 *buffer, u32 length) +{ + u8 sum = 0; + u8 *end = buffer + length; + + while (buffer < end) + sum = (u8)(sum + *(buffer++)); + + return sum; +} + +/* + * Used to search a block of memory for the RSDP signature. + * Return Pointer to the RSDP if found, otherwise NULL. + * Based on acpi_tb_scan_memory_for_rsdp(). + */ +static u8 *scan_mem_for_rsdp(u8 *start, u32 length) +{ + struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp; + u8 *end; + u8 *rover; + + end = start + length; + + /* Search from given start address for the requested length */ + for (rover = start; rover < end; rover += ACPI_RSDP_SCAN_STEP) { + /* + * The RSDP signature and checksum must both be correct + * Note: Sometimes there exists more than one RSDP in memory; + * the valid RSDP has a valid checksum, all others have an + * invalid checksum. + */ + rsdp = (struct acpi_table_rsdp *)rover; + + /* Nope, BAD Signature */ + if (!ACPI_VALIDATE_RSDP_SIG(rsdp->signature)) + continue; + + /* Check the standard checksum */ + if (compute_checksum((u8 *) rsdp, ACPI_RSDP_CHECKSUM_LENGTH)) + continue; + + /* Check extended checksum if table version >= 2 */ + if ((rsdp->revision >= 2) && + (compute_checksum((u8 *) rsdp, ACPI_RSDP_XCHECKSUM_LENGTH))) + continue; + + /* Sig and checksum valid, we have found a real RSDP */ + return rover; + } + return NULL; +} + +/* + * Used to search RSDP physical address. + * Based on acpi_find_root_pointer(). Since only use physical address + * in this period, so there is no need to do the memory map jobs. + */ +static void bios_get_rsdp_addr(acpi_physical_address *rsdp_addr) +{ + struct acpi_table_rsdp *rsdp; + u8 *table_ptr; + u8 *mem_rover; + u32 address; + + /* + * Get the location of the Extended BIOS Data Area (EBDA) + * Since we use physical address directely, so + * acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_unmap_memory() are + * not needed here. + */ + table_ptr = (u8 *)ACPI_EBDA_PTR_LOCATION; + *(u32 *)(void *)&address = *(u16 *)(void *)table_ptr; + address <<= 4; + table_ptr = (u8 *)address; + + /* + * Search EBDA paragraphs (EBDA is required to be a minimum of + * 1K length) + */ + if (address > 0x400) { + mem_rover = scan_mem_for_rsdp(table_ptr, ACPI_EBDA_WINDOW_SIZE); + + if (mem_rover) { + address += (u32)ACPI_PTR_DIFF(mem_rover, table_ptr); + *rsdp_addr = (acpi_physical_address)address; + return; + } + } + + table_ptr = (u8 *)ACPI_HI_RSDP_WINDOW_BASE; + mem_rover = scan_mem_for_rsdp(table_ptr, ACPI_HI_RSDP_WINDOW_SIZE); + + /* + * Search upper memory: 16-byte boundaries in E0000h-FFFFFh + * Since we use physical address directely, so + * acpi_os_map_memory() and acpi_os_unmap_memory() are + * not needed here. + */ + if (mem_rover) { + address = (u32)(ACPI_HI_RSDP_WINDOW_BASE + + ACPI_PTR_DIFF(mem_rover, table_ptr)); + *rsdp_addr = (acpi_physical_address)address; + } +}