diff mbox series

[2/6] i2c: fwnode: add fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node()

Message ID 20220318160059.328208-3-clement.leger@bootlin.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Headers show
Series introduce fwnode in the I2C subsystem | expand

Commit Message

Clément Léger March 18, 2022, 4 p.m. UTC
Add fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node() which allows to retrieve a i2c
adapter using a fwnode. Since dev_fwnode() uses the fwnode provided by
the of_node member of the device, this will also work for devices were
the of_node has been set and not the fwnode field.

Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/Makefile          |  1 +
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-fwnode.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/i2c.h           |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-fwnode.c

Comments

Andy Shevchenko March 18, 2022, 4:29 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> Add fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node() which allows to retrieve a i2c
> adapter using a fwnode. Since dev_fwnode() uses the fwnode provided by
> the of_node member of the device, this will also work for devices were
> the of_node has been set and not the fwnode field.

> +	/* For ACPI device node, we do not want to match the parent */

Why?
Neither commit message nor this comment does not answer to this question.
Clément Léger March 18, 2022, 4:54 p.m. UTC | #2
Le Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:29:39 +0200,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> a écrit :

> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:00:48PM +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> > Add fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node() which allows to retrieve a i2c
> > adapter using a fwnode. Since dev_fwnode() uses the fwnode provided by
> > the of_node member of the device, this will also work for devices were
> > the of_node has been set and not the fwnode field.
> 
> > +	/* For ACPI device node, we do not want to match the parent */  
> 
> Why?
> Neither commit message nor this comment does not answer to this question.
> 

Yes you are right. This is done to keep the existing behavior that is
applied by i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle() which only checks the
device node and not the parent one. Using the same behavior than for DT
would add some unwanted behavior in I2C device lookup for ACPI.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/Makefile b/drivers/i2c/Makefile
index c1d493dc9bac..c9c97675163e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/i2c/Makefile
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ 
 obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_BOARDINFO)	+= i2c-boardinfo.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_I2C)		+= i2c-core.o
 i2c-core-objs 			:= i2c-core-base.o i2c-core-smbus.o
+i2c-core-objs			+= i2c-core-fwnode.o
 i2c-core-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= i2c-core-acpi.o
 i2c-core-$(CONFIG_I2C_SLAVE) 	+= i2c-core-slave.o
 i2c-core-$(CONFIG_OF) 		+= i2c-core-of.o
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-fwnode.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-fwnode.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..2404c2477a80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-fwnode.c
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+/*
+ * Linux I2C core fwnode support code
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022 Microchip
+ */
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/i2c.h>
+
+#include "i2c-core.h"
+
+static int fwnode_dev_or_parent_node_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
+{
+	if (device_match_fwnode(dev, data))
+		return 1;
+
+	/* For ACPI device node, we do not want to match the parent */
+	if (!is_acpi_device_node(dev_fwnode(dev)) && dev->parent)
+		return device_match_fwnode(dev->parent, data);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+struct i2c_adapter *fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(struct fwnode_handle *node)
+{
+	struct device *dev;
+	struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
+
+	dev = bus_find_device(&i2c_bus_type, NULL, node,
+			      fwnode_dev_or_parent_node_match);
+	if (!dev)
+		return NULL;
+
+	adapter = i2c_verify_adapter(dev);
+	if (!adapter)
+		put_device(dev);
+
+	return adapter;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node);
diff --git a/include/linux/i2c.h b/include/linux/i2c.h
index 7d4f52ceb7b5..9b480a8b0a76 100644
--- a/include/linux/i2c.h
+++ b/include/linux/i2c.h
@@ -967,6 +967,8 @@  int i2c_handle_smbus_host_notify(struct i2c_adapter *adap, unsigned short addr);
 
 #endif /* I2C */
 
+struct i2c_adapter *fwnode_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(struct fwnode_handle *node);
+
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
 /* must call put_device() when done with returned i2c_client device */
 struct i2c_client *of_find_i2c_device_by_node(struct device_node *node);