Message ID | 20231127145907.131160-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | pnp: acpi: fix fortify warning | expand |
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 4:00 PM Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru> wrote: > > When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231126 (experimental) > and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following: > > In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:295, > from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:12, > from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53, > from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9, > from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79, > from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56, > from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:8, > from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7, > from ./include/linux/slab.h:16, > from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11, > from ./include/linux/acpi.h:13, > from drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c:11: > In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk', > inlined from 'pnpacpi_parse_allocated_vendor' at drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c:158:3, > inlined from 'pnpacpi_allocated_resource' at drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c:249:3: > ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field' > declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); > maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] > 588 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > According to the comments in include/linux/fortify-string.h, 'memcpy()', > 'memmove()' and 'memset()' must not be used beyond individual struct > members to ensure that the compiler can enforce protection against > buffer overflows, and, IIUC, this also applies to partial copies from > the particular member ('vendor->byte_data' in this case). So it should > be better (and safer) to do both copies at once (and 'byte_data' of > 'struct acpi_resource_vendor_typed' seems to be a good candidate for > '__counted_by(byte_length)' as well). > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru> > --- > drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c > index 4f05f610391b..af51f893525e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c > +++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c > @@ -152,12 +152,12 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_vendor(struct pnp_dev *dev, > struct acpi_resource_vendor_typed *vendor) > { > if (vendor_resource_matches(dev, vendor, &hp_ccsr_uuid, 16)) { > - u64 start, length; > + struct { u64 start, length; } range; > > - memcpy(&start, vendor->byte_data, sizeof(start)); > - memcpy(&length, vendor->byte_data + 8, sizeof(length)); > + memcpy(&range, vendor->byte_data, 16); sizeof(range) instead of 16 here? > > - pnp_add_mem_resource(dev, start, start + length - 1, 0); > + pnp_add_mem_resource(dev, range.start, range.start + > + range.length - 1, 0); > } > } > > --
diff --git a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c index 4f05f610391b..af51f893525e 100644 --- a/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c +++ b/drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c @@ -152,12 +152,12 @@ static void pnpacpi_parse_allocated_vendor(struct pnp_dev *dev, struct acpi_resource_vendor_typed *vendor) { if (vendor_resource_matches(dev, vendor, &hp_ccsr_uuid, 16)) { - u64 start, length; + struct { u64 start, length; } range; - memcpy(&start, vendor->byte_data, sizeof(start)); - memcpy(&length, vendor->byte_data + 8, sizeof(length)); + memcpy(&range, vendor->byte_data, 16); - pnp_add_mem_resource(dev, start, start + length - 1, 0); + pnp_add_mem_resource(dev, range.start, range.start + + range.length - 1, 0); } }
When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231126 (experimental) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y, I've noticed the following: In file included from ./include/linux/string.h:295, from ./include/linux/bitmap.h:12, from ./include/linux/cpumask.h:12, from ./arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:17, from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid.h:62, from ./arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:19, from ./arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h:5, from ./arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h:53, from ./include/linux/thread_info.h:60, from ./arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h:9, from ./include/linux/preempt.h:79, from ./include/linux/spinlock.h:56, from ./include/linux/mmzone.h:8, from ./include/linux/gfp.h:7, from ./include/linux/slab.h:16, from ./include/linux/resource_ext.h:11, from ./include/linux/acpi.h:13, from drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c:11: In function 'fortify_memcpy_chk', inlined from 'pnpacpi_parse_allocated_vendor' at drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c:158:3, inlined from 'pnpacpi_allocated_resource' at drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c:249:3: ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:588:25: warning: call to '__read_overflow2_field' declared with attribute warning: detected read beyond size of field (2nd parameter); maybe use struct_group()? [-Wattribute-warning] 588 | __read_overflow2_field(q_size_field, size); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ According to the comments in include/linux/fortify-string.h, 'memcpy()', 'memmove()' and 'memset()' must not be used beyond individual struct members to ensure that the compiler can enforce protection against buffer overflows, and, IIUC, this also applies to partial copies from the particular member ('vendor->byte_data' in this case). So it should be better (and safer) to do both copies at once (and 'byte_data' of 'struct acpi_resource_vendor_typed' seems to be a good candidate for '__counted_by(byte_length)' as well). Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru> --- drivers/pnp/pnpacpi/rsparser.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)