From patchwork Sat Jul 6 15:23:33 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Javier Carrasco X-Patchwork-Id: 13725879 Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com [209.85.208.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5891A13AD06; Sat, 6 Jul 2024 15:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720279438; cv=none; b=oewNi7Y8jGE87RxobgColeONX187XoI2fI5PRgaSjD/p7CkBakFaKrDj731ew17QVvF4FhLGrBuqrODFXXDmKWojLYdXC33zF2YHoD8awD9dTvCUWqxF0AyrpBrUB6vTeG7VqaGarm5xGltWOEy9OWoaQBVyH9SVRZLIl11cFXw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720279438; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7+6Z0APHavEMWbcX1CrJj4Il3cLB/Qq2MtDoHz0G0Fc=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=TsTWJmQCIXyIzLCFNsGy7WDrtE03Th69NQSr2NjQYpEZYW/TzcvrNxwnWa8HH6FoeuPEKf/qpV/3OadssU5e81xFg3vaNgRXiVDZ4kq8uvljy0ZS2rap93aQ4rvcU5pmfkyXnNzSw02bRN892dj2IwWDRHGV69RVK5zVcTzUGn0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=P0jsVnRS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.208.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="P0jsVnRS" Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ebed33cb65so32579611fa.2; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:23:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1720279434; x=1720884234; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=6vonvdo4buTi8Kek3AF2MBmwqbEkxs8m01cZABzJaEc=; b=P0jsVnRSmh4Fdw9M2GU0TpiQV5aQ1IJ/MkbuUF/Uw/yJL3SfuygNVqMp5TYWww8Qvy 0x2RL8VTvNedQ3V8id0LvDiiC7J1E2B62RcfthU59WwYvuUepb/zt0wn4yzr/lo4nnPq fyArHxJZjqEDEPCeofAtC9GDcn7wBBXtQ0V0lrx0TiIZ9/k7/iD310/6PWJud2/XEIox Gku8Ha3koWyCBuDCVJrSVyoikmd7rv0TIvLtcsCq7M1ERTLMzRVjkGd8WD6Dve8obFtK Sjx2rfJEmIZuX0PUYHqQniwWHqhrHIBtkJKEJhB7m4OYC1qyfdMDmRVBgdF/32v/eDSa e+8w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720279434; x=1720884234; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6vonvdo4buTi8Kek3AF2MBmwqbEkxs8m01cZABzJaEc=; b=b4LspPmTQSODlAyqaja0zqcDGhD/ifFzOjAIIFixX4nIJX8+Cj5JYtlk8JWevSCsPa n7j9bVdAcflj2FjfFnnuGwL0aRnkU+Jctuz5d8raWEWYHJC20XsNGjC9cu661VSn+1Qk lLXCYInKv4n0Rfinq0xa03/YQ3GTrFWKJY6paYRatZ5C/CLvncgSqzYvcyzBsww58BE7 lI4igKcHUfPvKVJOsX61dvPAtA2wIRUDB293uJrhBuF5pRi8wW/oU2SVc6Kr6CJji7IF 2chygIA3/YuqbHrD1Ax+DEN+dkgCv2tnKkT2lrSp4PlajOL96mjy1G3jhh8mkxDCDSKX 1dyg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUgCtL1DPRbg/iTCwBKx191LPi2JMCZlx2+z2S9dadnyq8dxh7qQwGfnlAXkcM4BSz2y/1CrnAWKJ4Mv2rtNuDKfAOxhyg23rDgHwd3EDGCoKyqL59UZO9ny1WqPLZmRIDjIdal+x6bmTGOGEgem8cr4+ESVSgpJQfOk7OxeG6XtiC7vcPf+4Qrc9TYCfIHqr6WahmuolvX0MmO7ILC X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnqM/sXL9CVFl9sEOIZoteNQhrD0MFFNA+qFgCTs0smcBw1tm4 Q4uaDcunAPs/gwxC7PTuwITsT5RYKH1EjM/re1IgA70bUfOh0AZM X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEWCoiG5MnGrUnj5UnoDy02MYCZUmysm6Wu8MxysqIvfh/76n1gkocfimi5zpgGIOZP09yCEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:c2:b0:2ec:5621:b9f2 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2ee8edd33edmr49536161fa.41.1720279434153; Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (2a02-8389-41cf-e200-d11b-8ec4-ea76-796c.cable.dynamic.v6.surfer.at. [2a02:8389:41cf:e200:d11b:8ec4:ea76:796c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-3679ed376cdsm6421593f8f.114.2024.07.06.08.23.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 06 Jul 2024 08:23:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Javier Carrasco Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 17:23:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] device property: document device_for_each_child_node macro Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20240706-device_for_each_child_node-available-v1-1-8a3f7615e41c@gmail.com> References: <20240706-device_for_each_child_node-available-v1-0-8a3f7615e41c@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20240706-device_for_each_child_node-available-v1-0-8a3f7615e41c@gmail.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andy Shevchenko , Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , Pavel Machek , Lee Jones , Marcin Wojtas , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Javier Carrasco X-Mailer: b4 0.14-dev X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1720279430; l=2008; i=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com; s=20240312; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=7+6Z0APHavEMWbcX1CrJj4Il3cLB/Qq2MtDoHz0G0Fc=; b=Y6hFK7KTaGbWVOlWICFvFipwEEBFAf0YclD7EeQp5JBtkmCNbSRA+aUo1WRqLA/jOsQy5Bz9o MGkYVLJqmycBqsIVGJRJOX6UrnjCQKgbRAKXJYxJHkBJEzPzfUA9Ekk X-Developer-Key: i=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com; a=ed25519; pk=lzSIvIzMz0JhJrzLXI0HAdPwsNPSSmEn6RbS+PTS9aQ= There have been some misconceptions about this macro, which iterates over available child nodes from different backends. As that is not obvious by its name, some users have opted for the `fwnode_for_each_available_child_node()` macro instead. That requires an unnecessary, explicit access to the fwnode member of the device structure. Passing the device to `device_for_each_child_node()` is shorter, reflects more clearly the nature of the child nodes, and renders the same result. In general, `fwnode_for_each_available_child_node()` should be used whenever the parent node of the children to iterate over is a firmware node, and not the device itself. Document the `device_for_each_child node(dev, child)` macro to clarify its functionality. Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron --- include/linux/property.h | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h index 61fc20e5f81f..ba8a3dc54786 100644 --- a/include/linux/property.h +++ b/include/linux/property.h @@ -171,6 +171,16 @@ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_get_next_available_child_node( struct fwnode_handle *device_get_next_child_node(const struct device *dev, struct fwnode_handle *child); +/** + * device_for_each_child_node - iterate over available child nodes of a device + * @dev: Pointer to the struct device + * @child: Pointer to an available child node in each loop iteration, if found + * + * Unavailable nodes are skipped i.e. this macro is implicitly _available_. + * The reference to the child node must be dropped on early exits. + * See fwnode_handle_put(). + * For a scoped version of this macro, use device_for_each_child_node_scoped(). + */ #define device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) \ for (child = device_get_next_child_node(dev, NULL); child; \ child = device_get_next_child_node(dev, child))