diff mbox series

[v4,2/2] cppc_cpufreq: Remove HiSilicon CPPC workaround

Message ID 20240929033214.1039485-3-zhanjie9@hisilicon.com (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere, archived
Headers show
Series cppc_cpufreq: Rework ->get() error handling when cores are idle | expand

Commit Message

Jie Zhan Sept. 29, 2024, 3:32 a.m. UTC
Since commit 6c8d750f9784 ("cpufreq / cppc: Work around for Hisilicon CPPC
cpufreq"), we introduce a workround for HiSilicon platforms that do not
support performance feedback counters, whereas they can get the actual
frequency from the desired perf register.  Later on, FIE is disabled in
that workaround as well.

Now the workround can be handled by the common code.  Desired perf would be
read and converted to frequency if feedback counters don't change.  FIE
would be disabled if the CPPC regs are in PCC region.

Hence, the workaround is no longer needed and can be safely removed, in an
effort to consolidate the driver procedure.

Signed-off-by: Jie Zhan <zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 71 ----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 71 deletions(-)

Comments

kernel test robot Oct. 1, 2024, 12:41 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Jie,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test WARNING on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge linus/master v6.12-rc1 next-20241001]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jie-Zhan/cppc_cpufreq-Use-desired-perf-if-feedback-ctrs-are-0-or-unchanged/20240929-114043
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240929033214.1039485-3-zhanjie9%40hisilicon.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] cppc_cpufreq: Remove HiSilicon CPPC workaround
config: riscv-randconfig-r062-20241001 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241001/202410012047.ZH3rP9hj-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7773243d9916f98ba0ffce0c3a960e4aa9f03e81)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241001/202410012047.ZH3rP9hj-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410012047.ZH3rP9hj-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:45:3: warning: unused variable 'fie_disabled' [-Wunused-variable]
      45 | } fie_disabled = FIE_UNSET;
         |   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   1 warning generated.


vim +/fie_disabled +45 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c

a3f083e04a8766 Zheng Bin     2022-05-21  40  
ae2df912d1a557 Jeremy Linton 2022-09-12  41  static enum {
ae2df912d1a557 Jeremy Linton 2022-09-12  42  	FIE_UNSET = -1,
ae2df912d1a557 Jeremy Linton 2022-09-12  43  	FIE_ENABLED,
ae2df912d1a557 Jeremy Linton 2022-09-12  44  	FIE_DISABLED
ae2df912d1a557 Jeremy Linton 2022-09-12 @45  } fie_disabled = FIE_UNSET;
ae2df912d1a557 Jeremy Linton 2022-09-12  46
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 646b466002c6..ae3424cb3335 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -36,24 +36,6 @@  static LIST_HEAD(cpu_data_list);
 
 static bool boost_supported;
 
-struct cppc_workaround_oem_info {
-	char oem_id[ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE + 1];
-	char oem_table_id[ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE + 1];
-	u32 oem_revision;
-};
-
-static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = {
-	{
-		.oem_id		= "HISI  ",
-		.oem_table_id	= "HIP07   ",
-		.oem_revision	= 0,
-	}, {
-		.oem_id		= "HISI  ",
-		.oem_table_id	= "HIP08   ",
-		.oem_revision	= 0,
-	}
-};
-
 static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver;
 
 static enum {
@@ -78,7 +60,6 @@  struct cppc_freq_invariance {
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cppc_freq_invariance, cppc_freq_inv);
 static struct kthread_worker *kworker_fie;
 
-static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu);
 static int cppc_perf_from_fbctrs(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data,
 				 struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs_t0,
 				 struct cppc_perf_fb_ctrs *fb_ctrs_t1);
@@ -847,57 +828,6 @@  static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.name = "cppc_cpufreq",
 };
 
-/*
- * HISI platform does not support delivered performance counter and
- * reference performance counter. It can calculate the performance using the
- * platform specific mechanism. We reuse the desired performance register to
- * store the real performance calculated by the platform.
- */
-static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpu)
-{
-	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
-	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu_data;
-	u64 desired_perf;
-	int ret;
-
-	if (!policy)
-		return -ENODEV;
-
-	cpu_data = policy->driver_data;
-
-	cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
-
-	ret = cppc_get_desired_perf(cpu, &desired_perf);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return -EIO;
-
-	return cppc_perf_to_khz(&cpu_data->perf_caps, desired_perf);
-}
-
-static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)
-{
-	struct acpi_table_header *tbl;
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
-	int i;
-
-	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PCCT, 0, &tbl);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !tbl)
-		return;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_info); i++) {
-		if (!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_id, tbl->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE) &&
-		    !memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_table_id, tbl->oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
-		    wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) {
-			/* Overwrite the get() callback */
-			cppc_cpufreq_driver.get = hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate;
-			fie_disabled = FIE_DISABLED;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	acpi_put_table(tbl);
-}
-
 static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -905,7 +835,6 @@  static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)
 	if (!acpi_cpc_valid())
 		return -ENODEV;
 
-	cppc_check_hisi_workaround();
 	cppc_freq_invariance_init();
 	populate_efficiency_class();