Message ID | 52799553.7020406@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 09:03:15 AM Aaron Lu wrote: > When testing if the firmware's initial value is valid, we should use > the corrected level value instead of the raw value returned from > firmware. > > Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> > Cc: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de> > Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Any pointers to bug reports, BZ entries, etc? > --- > drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c > index 38c3a28d6392..bf521b36c2f9 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c > @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device) > * or an index). Set the backlight to max_level in this case. > */ > for (i = 2; i < br->count; i++) > - if (level_old == br->levels[i]) > + if (level == br->levels[i]) > break; > if (i == br->count) > level = max_level; >
On 11/07/2013 06:03 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, November 06, 2013 09:03:15 AM Aaron Lu wrote: >> When testing if the firmware's initial value is valid, we should use >> the corrected level value instead of the raw value returned from >> firmware. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> >> Cc: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de> >> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> > > Any pointers to bug reports, BZ entries, etc? This patch doesn't solve any bugs, I found the problem while preparing patch 2/2. Now I remembered some stable rule that patch that solves a potential bug isn't acceptable, so the stable tag should be dropped. Thanks, Aaron > >> --- >> drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c >> index 38c3a28d6392..bf521b36c2f9 100644 >> --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c >> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device) >> * or an index). Set the backlight to max_level in this case. >> */ >> for (i = 2; i < br->count; i++) >> - if (level_old == br->levels[i]) >> + if (level == br->levels[i]) >> break; >> if (i == br->count) >> level = max_level; >> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/video.c b/drivers/acpi/video.c index 38c3a28d6392..bf521b36c2f9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/video.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/video.c @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ acpi_video_init_brightness(struct acpi_video_device *device) * or an index). Set the backlight to max_level in this case. */ for (i = 2; i < br->count; i++) - if (level_old == br->levels[i]) + if (level == br->levels[i]) break; if (i == br->count) level = max_level;
When testing if the firmware's initial value is valid, we should use the corrected level value instead of the raw value returned from firmware. Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Cc: Danny Baumann <dannybaumann@web.de> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> --- drivers/acpi/video.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)