From patchwork Tue Jul 10 17:17:17 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Robin Murphy X-Patchwork-Id: 10517909 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849E4603D7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5CC26B39 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 6E57929200; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:43:24 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1881926B39 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389011AbeGJSdm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:33:42 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:51802 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388985AbeGJSdm (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:33:42 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672F9168F; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:17:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e110467-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.210.23]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D8B083F589; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 10:17:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Robin Murphy To: hch@lst.de, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, joro@8bytes.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/IORT: Set bus DMA mask as appropriate Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:17:17 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1.dirty In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP When an explicit DMA limit is described by firmware, we need to remember it regardless of how drivers might subsequently update their devices' masks. The new bus_dma_mask field does that. Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy --- drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c index 4a66896e2aa3..bc51cff5505e 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c @@ -1014,6 +1014,7 @@ void iort_dma_setup(struct device *dev, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *dma_size) * Limit coherent and dma mask based on size * retrieved from firmware. */ + dev->bus_dma_mask = mask; dev->coherent_dma_mask = mask; *dev->dma_mask = mask; }