Message ID | 0101016ed57a10a8-bd8fbdb9-a5cd-4460-bae6-c5c35f0eed88-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add EDAC support for Kryo CPU core caches | expand |
Hi Sai, (CC: +Tyler) On 05/12/2019 09:52, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: > This series implements EDAC support for error reporting on > Kryo{3,4}XX CPU caches L1,L2, L3-SCU. All the cores(big.LITTLE) > in Kryo{3,4}XX CPUs implement RAS extensions and use interrupt > based ECC mechanism to report errors. > > This series has been tested on SC7180, SDM845, SM8150 SoCs with > Kryo{3,4}XX CPU cores based on ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A75 and > Cortex-A76. > > This implementation is platform specific in contrast to the > patch posted last time for generic error reporting on arm cortex > implementations with RAS extensions by Kyle Yan. > - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10161955/ I think that series was dropped because it was too soc-specific and overlaps with the v8.2 kernel first support. That series was superseded by: lore.kernel.org/r/1562086280-5351-1-git-send-email-baicar@os.amperecomputing.com Can you work with Tyler on a combined series? The combined support may need to look quite different. (DT and big/little being the obvious differences). I'm afraid this is the tip of the kernel-first-RAS iceberg. Thanks, James
Hello James, On 2020-01-16 00:16, James Morse wrote: > Hi Sai, > > (CC: +Tyler) > > On 05/12/2019 09:52, Sai Prakash Ranjan wrote: >> This series implements EDAC support for error reporting on >> Kryo{3,4}XX CPU caches L1,L2, L3-SCU. All the cores(big.LITTLE) >> in Kryo{3,4}XX CPUs implement RAS extensions and use interrupt >> based ECC mechanism to report errors. >> >> This series has been tested on SC7180, SDM845, SM8150 SoCs with >> Kryo{3,4}XX CPU cores based on ARM Cortex-A55, Cortex-A75 and >> Cortex-A76. >> >> This implementation is platform specific in contrast to the >> patch posted last time for generic error reporting on arm cortex >> implementations with RAS extensions by Kyle Yan. >> - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10161955/ > > I think that series was dropped because it was too soc-specific and > overlaps with the v8.2 > kernel first support. That series was superseded by: > lore.kernel.org/r/1562086280-5351-1-git-send-email-baicar@os.amperecomputing.com > > Can you work with Tyler on a combined series? The combined support may > need to look quite > different. (DT and big/little being the obvious differences). > > I'm afraid this is the tip of the kernel-first-RAS iceberg. > Sorry for the delayed response. Sure, I will take a look at the series posted by Tyler. It might take some time to come up with that but should be doable with your review :) Thanks, Sai