Message ID | 1673601740-122788-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Add metrics for neoverse-n2-v2 | expand |
On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: > Changes since v6: > - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian. > - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle, > per John's suggestion; > - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak > function, per John's suggestion; > - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion. > - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$ This looks fine. But for this code: On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: > +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void) > +{ > + char path[PATH_MAX]; > + unsigned long long slots = 0; I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that. For series: Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
在 2023/1/13 下午5:59, John Garry 写道: > On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: >> Changes since v6: >> - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian. >> - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle, >> per John's suggestion; >> - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak >> function, per John's suggestion; >> - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion. >> - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$ > > This looks fine. But for this code: > > On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: >> +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void) >> +{ >> + char path[PATH_MAX]; >> + unsigned long long slots = 0; > > I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that. > Ok, I like this way too. > For series: > > Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> Thank you very much indeed!
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:32 AM Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > 在 2023/1/13 下午5:59, John Garry 写道: > > On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: > >> Changes since v6: > >> - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian. > >> - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle, > >> per John's suggestion; > >> - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak > >> function, per John's suggestion; > >> - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion. > >> - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$ > > > > This looks fine. But for this code: > > > > On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: > >> +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void) > >> +{ > >> + char path[PATH_MAX]; > >> + unsigned long long slots = 0; > > > > I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that. > > > > Ok, I like this way too. > > > For series: > > > > Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> > > Thank you very much indeed! Aside a naming nit in 1/9 for series: Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Thanks, Ian
在 2023/1/15 上午6:40, Ian Rogers 写道: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:32 AM Jing Zhang <renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> 在 2023/1/13 下午5:59, John Garry 写道: >>> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: >>>> Changes since v6: >>>> - Split patch #1 into 3 smaller patches as suggested by Ian. >>>> - Change perf_pmu__get_slots into perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle, >>>> per John's suggestion; >>>> - Return NAN instead of 0 in perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle weak >>>> function, per John's suggestion; >>>> - Factor out pmu_core__find_same function, per John's suggestion. >>>> - Link:https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lore.kernel.org/all/1673017529-1429208-1-git-send-email-renyu.zj@linux.alibaba.com/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!LhBq67uDCOsz1k7ZF4aQPHF0Bp8FsMr-ZNgCnBSUKF4qJTFODfnkId7lw_NXqB4qZUCpu-jbY8z8LTckoqFGz2Q8bA$ >>> >>> This looks fine. But for this code: >>> >>> On 13/01/2023 09:22, Jing Zhang wrote: >>>> +double perf_pmu__cpu_slots_per_cycle(void) >>>> +{ >>>> + char path[PATH_MAX]; >>>> + unsigned long long slots = 0; >>> >>> I would prefer if this returned NAN (and not 0) for when we can't find a pmu or the value from ./caps/slots is zero, but I am not going to get too hung up on that. >>> >> >> Ok, I like this way too. >> >>> For series: >>> >>> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com> >> >> Thank you very much indeed! > > Aside a naming nit in 1/9 for series: > > Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> > Thank you sincerely! > Thanks, > Ian