Message ID | 20181120145351.30390-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | staging: vchiq: dead code removal & misc fixes | expand |
> Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> hat am 20. November 2018 um 15:53 geschrieben: > > > Hi All, > > This series was written in parallel with reading and understanding the > vchiq code. So excuse me for the lack of logic in the sequence of > patches. > > The main focus was to delete as much code as possible, I've counted > around 550 lines, which is not bad. Apart from that there are some > patches enforcing proper kernel APIs usage. > > The only patch that really changes code is the > vchiq_ioc_copy_element_data() rewrite. > > The last commit updates the TODO list with some of my observations, I > realise some of the might be a little opinionated. If anything it's > going to force a discussion on the topic, which is nice. > > It was developed on top of the latest linux-next, and was tested on a > RPIv3B+ with audio, video and running vchiq_test. > > Regards, > Nicolas > > RFC -> PATCH, as per Stefan's comments: > - Remove semaphore initialization from remove_event_create() > (commit 9) > - Join all three semaphore to completion patches (commit 11) > - Update probe/init commit message (commit 14) > - Update TODO commit message and clean up (commit 16) > - Fix spelling on some of the patches > The whole series is Acked-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Unfortunately patch 05 might not apply.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 08:36:33PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote: > > Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> hat am 20. November 2018 um 15:53 geschrieben: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > This series was written in parallel with reading and understanding the > > vchiq code. So excuse me for the lack of logic in the sequence of > > patches. > > > > The main focus was to delete as much code as possible, I've counted > > around 550 lines, which is not bad. Apart from that there are some > > patches enforcing proper kernel APIs usage. > > > > The only patch that really changes code is the > > vchiq_ioc_copy_element_data() rewrite. > > > > The last commit updates the TODO list with some of my observations, I > > realise some of the might be a little opinionated. If anything it's > > going to force a discussion on the topic, which is nice. > > > > It was developed on top of the latest linux-next, and was tested on a > > RPIv3B+ with audio, video and running vchiq_test. > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas > > > > RFC -> PATCH, as per Stefan's comments: > > - Remove semaphore initialization from remove_event_create() > > (commit 9) > > - Join all three semaphore to completion patches (commit 11) > > - Update probe/init commit message (commit 14) > > - Update TODO commit message and clean up (commit 16) > > - Fix spelling on some of the patches > > > > The whole series is > > Acked-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> > > Unfortunately patch 05 might not apply. I fixed it up. thanks, greg k-h