From patchwork Mon Apr 15 17:49:03 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jonathan Cameron X-Patchwork-Id: 10901307 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373FB186E for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AAA283F9 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 0DA1B28608; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:49:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3E7328662 for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:49:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To :From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=DoEgMy5glOHIazStKWGiY4fnJlv2Fy6QBkOAhD5oZGQ=; b=Fahr/ZbVJBRSuD 9ZswIt0ZM/5epXvWbS5qkycFll3PCANlTiJSh1d7JMZQst8Vg5AQGYWSwnKYRExRWqlNBzkWc58cK 323VLv74GI6GATBylwOmT9DvcuOVePQE2QmctF5xvrp5mpVkq72/JyDkWuf08YD1BUHiE0VkcIDkj Ckfv3R7KcSJ/br4WNm0nlNpV8L8O0h9q4qj3QlMUj9/Y84IKy0a7TabsQcvvDiRZiauyliJP6zeO0 1UaA1Nrfj3oZz4R6/U3CSIFq0pw6PE44q1OMe1f3tVswbJpfhXtUctggmgdXMAJkGxPaGLiOM3eey MpUa2CfRdNcW6joYpNPA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hG5jr-0007iG-J3; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:49:51 +0000 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32] helo=huawei.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hG5jo-0007gd-0w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:49:49 +0000 Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id DB9D932B0FF3B7868F30; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:49:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from FRA1000014316.huawei.com (100.126.230.97) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:49:31 +0800 From: Jonathan Cameron To: , , , Subject: [PATCH 0/4 V3] ACPI: Support generic initiator proximity domains Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:49:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20190415174907.102307-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [100.126.230.97] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190415_104948_242190_C8F4A7E6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 16.74 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" , linuxarm@huawei.com, Keith Busch , =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsO0bWUgR2xpc3Nl?= , Jonathan Cameron , Andrew Morton Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Changes since RFC V2. * RFC dropped as now we have x86 support, so the lack of guards in in the ACPI code etc should now be fine. * Added x86 support. Note this has only been tested on QEMU as I don't have a convenient x86 NUMA machine to play with. Note that this fitted together rather differently form arm64 so I'm particularly interested in feedback on the two solutions. Since RFC V1. * Fix incorrect interpretation of the ACPI entry noted by Keith Busch * Use the acpica headers definitions that are now in mmotm. It's worth noting that, to safely put a given device in a GI node, may require changes to the existing drivers as it's not unusual to assume you have local memory or processor core. There may be futher constraints not yet covered by this patch. Original cover letter... ACPI 6.3 introduced a new entity that can be part of a NUMA proximity domain. It may share such a domain with the existing options (memory, cpu etc) but it may also exist on it's own. The intent is to allow the description of the NUMA properties (particulary via HMAT) of accelerators and other initiators of memory activity that are not the host processor running the operating system. This patch set introduces 'just enough' to make them work for arm64 and x86. It should be trivial to support other architectures, I just don't suitable NUMA systems readily available to test. There are a few quirks that need to be considered. 1. Fall back nodes ****************** As pre ACPI 6.3 supporting operating systems do not have Generic Initiator Proximity Domains it is possible to specify, via _PXM in DSDT that another device is part of such a GI only node. This currently blows up spectacularly. Whilst we can obviously 'now' protect against such a situation (see the related thread on PCI _PXM support and the threadripper board identified there as also falling into the problem of using non existent nodes https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10723311/ ), there is no way to be sure we will never have legacy OSes that are not protected against this. It would also be 'non ideal' to fallback to a default node as there may be a better (non GI) node to pick if GI nodes aren't available. The work around is that we also have a new system wide OSC bit that allows an operating system to 'annouce' that it supports Generic Initiators. This allows, the firmware to us DSDT magic to 'move' devices between the nodes dependent on whether our new nodes are there or not. 2. New ways of assigning a proximity domain for devices ******************************************************* Until now, the only way firmware could indicate that a particular device (outside the 'special' set of cpus etc) was to be found in a particular Proximity Domain by the use of _PXM in DSDT. That is equally valid with GI domains, but we have new options. The SRAT affinity structure includes a handle (ACPI or PCI) to identify devices with the system and specify their proximity domain that way. If both _PXM and this are provided, they should give the same answer. For now this patch set completely ignores that feature as we don't need it to start the discussion. It will form a follow up set at some point (if no one else fancies doing it). Jonathan Cameron (4): ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains arm64: Support Generic Initiator only domains x86: Support Generic Initiator only proximity domains ACPI: Let ACPI know we support Generic Initiator Affinity Structures arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 8 +++++ arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 2 ++ arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 1 + arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 14 ++++++++ drivers/acpi/bus.c | 1 + drivers/acpi/numa.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- drivers/base/node.c | 3 ++ include/asm-generic/topology.h | 3 ++ include/linux/acpi.h | 1 + include/linux/nodemask.h | 1 + include/linux/topology.h | 7 ++++ 11 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)