Message ID | 20191019022048.28065-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=Gvky=YM=lists.infradead.org=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA6417EE for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ECF120700 for <patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="IoKImEj1"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Ph7M/rPN" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3ECF120700 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe: List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:Date: Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:List-Owner; bh=n8kT5IvooMsgV8+mdwoxkeLF3PWmU1L9+58vvmG/16o=; b=IoK ImEj1PqjhafTQJsRQ4CFNWLQ10FSZNR+E8HJub0hb/YuTkNHiBsQ1moxOgUZcljMVQkGVXGYYTiGc Ulk4K0R//a69pWWvWR3VMtNhplSVaIM+dAR13GGi+UW+krUfm1AiREIfpnMHRHylcIG3fqgVbXPso ojvj0a8mTYX+OjlJGqFTiLzl9/15AMUAXoDP74vlcKtcAjksWEcreV9tPnue4fk8nI/gyx74y7tnG 77Ow+KpSX5TGIeTaMqXSuMwUnWGLJyHOYfI+T0/hDLnui7F+hN1Sf+9abLCXWW94pLxo5emgoN/M+ RhYGLAwPZ5XRjke/jpWwaFub6xxVfGA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iLeMT-0006cR-Cm; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:57 +0000 Received: from mail-pg1-x541.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::541]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1iLeMP-0006bY-Vf for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 02:20:55 +0000 Received: by mail-pg1-x541.google.com with SMTP id r1so4303789pgj.12 for <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:20:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=OZxB3yUZwqmkE8nLK0z7B1QOB/S9NBhwSOUrUzW9bzE=; b=Ph7M/rPNYPADQmJaP49bXc0xz4mq6WHHW5zTvjajYV2BoL+iLcPY25tzrl1YhrFp8X xxFObrvyMJXmUB3IlfeHJBOw6oVl45vEq/IHgpGO5mg9QFKzgT6at3FZqIjBiupOb9XX Vs9Q3GNfBNJoX77w3ZYaOVYkkmYWft/zv6KJ/rHG3IHs6MRYcC0hOzMGpLt+qbic+qbX +3Okt15ibCSrAQM6khnnZnAgfnCoD9WlKfppm+8Pt17EEyOz05nFUwZi3P4ak+Qz4Bwg LVuycSLJvIi/3y+Icjo9PFu81ihbxLXLbILVOfUOl94R8vjwVfBqWherraEqPsJwtClp ymlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=OZxB3yUZwqmkE8nLK0z7B1QOB/S9NBhwSOUrUzW9bzE=; b=mxqaoR6SFwwIt4fRS+IKy43P+Y1UFJWunE3cmsd1MANaghjiiKet38r7w/wpwYRYrG cf5ZwQkeVgjbm9riSYn4rWWx+bLgfWzXv69SJUJRoYV2WKIiuQVQO+3CCD/hAEhUd7Jl rWEwnzvU0LRvZG6f1hwYVFYd/OPqxpYS5H/hrgU02IXul52gdEIjTfEOAIKBWzaf1Mt5 ZD4zeqf001IK1e0S2hplcsW3Ev/xH6GI451h2gYsn5emyHGqnqIacJPNC6sgwMxKM9pp QyilNx+NDKenesc3gbhseaEOqVmCXsIBa89bXTAgpshqwjtGa5UFD1udMavMuaMgmQfz mSHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVRVTnec/00HJ+Y4IfNBMEws7G8IZKATfQoQogU9zKl/aY7dP8E +fkmm3bFTMmXOUdPwCVgag7uvCsmr4g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz38lTUQmrPoILgjPmnL2NLsievHn6HKcnthBzPOb1nk5ouaMoUhSqGykRB4C29lhrEG+AoUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:2348:: with SMTP id u8mr13305452pgm.422.1571451651538; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:20:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (97-113-7-119.tukw.qwest.net. [97.113.7.119]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm6635148pgj.4.2019.10.18.19.20.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:20:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 0/1] arm64: Implement archrandom.h for ARMv8.5-RNG Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 19:20:47 -0700 Message-Id: <20191019022048.28065-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191018_192054_051254_41A217E5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.95 ) X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.4.2 on bombadil.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-0.2 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [2607:f8b0:4864:20:0:0:0:541 listed in] [list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, Dave.Martin@arm.com, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
arm64: Implement archrandom.h for ARMv8.5-RNG
|
expand
|
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> The ARMv8.5-RNG extension adds a hardware random number generator. The plumbing for this is already present in the kernel; we just have to take advantage of that. Possible issues: When should we use RNDRRS? For now I use it at boot, when validating that the implementation can produce a random number, much like other architectures validate before enabling. I also use it if RNDR fails. I don't know if that's a reasonable thing to do; the generic architecture docs are too vague about what's going on behind the scenes. I mark ARM64_HAS_RNG as ARM64_CPUCAP_STRICT_BOOT_CPU_FEATURE so that it is detected early, because crng_initialize() is called early. I don't know if this is quite the right thing if some hypothetial big.LITTLE only has the RNG on the big cpus. Tested with QEMU. r~ Richard Henderson (1): arm64: Implement archrandom.h for ARMv8.5-RNG Documentation/arm64/cpu-feature-registers.rst | 2 + arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h | 76 +++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 +- arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h | 1 + arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 34 +++++++++ arch/arm64/Kconfig | 12 +++ drivers/char/Kconfig | 4 +- 7 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h