Message ID | 20191022003537.13013-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays | expand |
On 22/10/19 02:35, Sean Christopherson wrote: > The end goal of this series is to dynamically size the memslot array so > that KVM allocates memory based on the number of memslots in use, as > opposed to unconditionally allocating memory for the maximum number of > memslots. On x86, each memslot consumes 88 bytes, and so with 2 address > spaces of 512 memslots, each VM consumes ~90k bytes for the memslots. > E.g. given a VM that uses a total of 30 memslots, dynamic sizing reduces > the memory footprint from 90k to ~2.6k bytes. > > The changes required to support dynamic sizing are relatively small, > e.g. are essentially contained in patches 12/13 and 13/13. Patches 1-11 > clean up the memslot code, which has gotten quite crusy, especially > __kvm_set_memory_region(). The clean up is likely not strictly necessary > to switch to dynamic sizing, but I didn't have a remotely reasonable > level of confidence in the correctness of the dynamic sizing without first > doing the clean up. > > Testing, especially non-x86 platforms, would be greatly appreciated. The > non-x86 changes are for all intents and purposes untested, e.g. I compile > tested pieces of the code by copying them into x86, but that's it. In > theory, the vast majority of the functional changes are arch agnostic, in > theory... > > v2: > - Split "Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot()" into three patches to move > minor functional changes to standalone patches [Janosch]. > - Rebase to latest kvm/queue (f0574a1cea5b, "KVM: x86: fix ...") > - Collect an Acked-by and a Reviewed-by > > Sean Christopherson (15): > KVM: Reinstall old memslots if arch preparation fails > KVM: Don't free new memslot if allocation of said memslot fails > KVM: PPC: Move memslot memory allocation into prepare_memory_region() > KVM: x86: Allocate memslot resources during prepare_memory_region() > KVM: Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot() > KVM: Explicitly free allocated-but-unused dirty bitmap > KVM: Refactor error handling for setting memory region > KVM: Move setting of memslot into helper routine > KVM: Move memslot deletion to helper function > KVM: Simplify kvm_free_memslot() and all its descendents > KVM: Clean up local variable usage in __kvm_set_memory_region() > KVM: Provide common implementation for generic dirty log functions > KVM: Ensure validity of memslot with respect to kvm_get_dirty_log() > KVM: Terminate memslot walks via used_slots > KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots > > arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- > arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 68 +--- > arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 14 +- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 22 +- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 36 +- > arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 20 +- > arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 17 +- > arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 13 +- > arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- > arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 21 +- > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 3 +- > arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c | 15 +- > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 100 ++--- > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 48 +-- > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 47 +-- > virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 18 +- > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 546 ++++++++++++++++---------- > 17 files changed, 467 insertions(+), 525 deletions(-) > Christian, Marc, Paul, can you help testing patches 1-13? Thanks,
On 22/10/19 02:35, Sean Christopherson wrote: > The end goal of this series is to dynamically size the memslot array so > that KVM allocates memory based on the number of memslots in use, as > opposed to unconditionally allocating memory for the maximum number of > memslots. On x86, each memslot consumes 88 bytes, and so with 2 address > spaces of 512 memslots, each VM consumes ~90k bytes for the memslots. > E.g. given a VM that uses a total of 30 memslots, dynamic sizing reduces > the memory footprint from 90k to ~2.6k bytes. > > The changes required to support dynamic sizing are relatively small, > e.g. are essentially contained in patches 12/13 and 13/13. Patches 1-11 > clean up the memslot code, which has gotten quite crusy, especially > __kvm_set_memory_region(). The clean up is likely not strictly necessary > to switch to dynamic sizing, but I didn't have a remotely reasonable > level of confidence in the correctness of the dynamic sizing without first > doing the clean up. > > Testing, especially non-x86 platforms, would be greatly appreciated. The > non-x86 changes are for all intents and purposes untested, e.g. I compile > tested pieces of the code by copying them into x86, but that's it. In > theory, the vast majority of the functional changes are arch agnostic, in > theory... > > v2: > - Split "Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot()" into three patches to move > minor functional changes to standalone patches [Janosch]. > - Rebase to latest kvm/queue (f0574a1cea5b, "KVM: x86: fix ...") > - Collect an Acked-by and a Reviewed-by I only have some cosmetic changes on patches 14-15. Let's wait for testing results. Paolo
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 05:35:22PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote: > The end goal of this series is to dynamically size the memslot array so > that KVM allocates memory based on the number of memslots in use, as > opposed to unconditionally allocating memory for the maximum number of > memslots. On x86, each memslot consumes 88 bytes, and so with 2 address > spaces of 512 memslots, each VM consumes ~90k bytes for the memslots. > E.g. given a VM that uses a total of 30 memslots, dynamic sizing reduces > the memory footprint from 90k to ~2.6k bytes. > > The changes required to support dynamic sizing are relatively small, > e.g. are essentially contained in patches 12/13 and 13/13. Patches 1-11 > clean up the memslot code, which has gotten quite crusy, especially > __kvm_set_memory_region(). The clean up is likely not strictly necessary > to switch to dynamic sizing, but I didn't have a remotely reasonable > level of confidence in the correctness of the dynamic sizing without first > doing the clean up. > > Testing, especially non-x86 platforms, would be greatly appreciated. The > non-x86 changes are for all intents and purposes untested, e.g. I compile > tested pieces of the code by copying them into x86, but that's it. In > theory, the vast majority of the functional changes are arch agnostic, in > theory... I've built this for arm/arm64, and I've ran my usual set of tests which pass fine. I've also run the selftest framework's tests for the dirty logging and the migration loop test for arm64, and they pass fine. You can add my (for arm64): Tested-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
On 22.10.19 15:59, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 22/10/19 02:35, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> The end goal of this series is to dynamically size the memslot array so >> that KVM allocates memory based on the number of memslots in use, as >> opposed to unconditionally allocating memory for the maximum number of >> memslots. On x86, each memslot consumes 88 bytes, and so with 2 address >> spaces of 512 memslots, each VM consumes ~90k bytes for the memslots. >> E.g. given a VM that uses a total of 30 memslots, dynamic sizing reduces >> the memory footprint from 90k to ~2.6k bytes. >> >> The changes required to support dynamic sizing are relatively small, >> e.g. are essentially contained in patches 12/13 and 13/13. Patches 1-11 >> clean up the memslot code, which has gotten quite crusy, especially >> __kvm_set_memory_region(). The clean up is likely not strictly necessary >> to switch to dynamic sizing, but I didn't have a remotely reasonable >> level of confidence in the correctness of the dynamic sizing without first >> doing the clean up. >> >> Testing, especially non-x86 platforms, would be greatly appreciated. The >> non-x86 changes are for all intents and purposes untested, e.g. I compile >> tested pieces of the code by copying them into x86, but that's it. In >> theory, the vast majority of the functional changes are arch agnostic, in >> theory... >> >> v2: >> - Split "Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot()" into three patches to move >> minor functional changes to standalone patches [Janosch]. >> - Rebase to latest kvm/queue (f0574a1cea5b, "KVM: x86: fix ...") >> - Collect an Acked-by and a Reviewed-by >> >> Sean Christopherson (15): >> KVM: Reinstall old memslots if arch preparation fails >> KVM: Don't free new memslot if allocation of said memslot fails >> KVM: PPC: Move memslot memory allocation into prepare_memory_region() >> KVM: x86: Allocate memslot resources during prepare_memory_region() >> KVM: Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot() >> KVM: Explicitly free allocated-but-unused dirty bitmap >> KVM: Refactor error handling for setting memory region >> KVM: Move setting of memslot into helper routine >> KVM: Move memslot deletion to helper function >> KVM: Simplify kvm_free_memslot() and all its descendents >> KVM: Clean up local variable usage in __kvm_set_memory_region() >> KVM: Provide common implementation for generic dirty log functions >> KVM: Ensure validity of memslot with respect to kvm_get_dirty_log() >> KVM: Terminate memslot walks via used_slots >> KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots >> >> arch/mips/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- >> arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 68 +--- >> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_ppc.h | 14 +- >> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c | 22 +- >> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv.c | 36 +- >> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_pr.c | 20 +- >> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke.c | 17 +- >> arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 13 +- >> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 +- >> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 21 +- >> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_page_track.h | 3 +- >> arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c | 15 +- >> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 100 ++--- >> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 48 +-- >> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 47 +-- >> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 18 +- >> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 546 ++++++++++++++++---------- >> 17 files changed, 467 insertions(+), 525 deletions(-) >> > > Christian, Marc, Paul, can you help testing patches 1-13? I see no obvious breakage on s390, but I will do some more testing in the next days.