Message ID | 20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Renesas SoC updates for v5.7 | expand |
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi arm-soc folks, > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates > for v5.7. > > It consists of 5 parts: Hi, Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5. Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't). Thanks! -Olof
Hi Olof, On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates > > for v5.7. > > > > It consists of 5 parts: > > Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5. > Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end > up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't). Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series. I do see them all of them at https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/, https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ? Lore also has them: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but never in my (Gmail) inbox. Do I still need to resend? Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 10:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Olof, > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 7:10 PM Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:02:16PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > This is my first pull request for the inclusion of Renesas SoC updates > > > for v5.7. > > > > > > It consists of 5 parts: > > > > Only 2 of these were sent to arm@kernel.org / soc@kernel.org: 2/5 and 5/5. > > Mind checking your scripts to make sure you send them to us so they end > > up in our patchwork? (And please resend the ones who weren't). > > Strange, I used a single git send-email command for the whole series. > > I do see them all of them at > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/, > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/list/?series=247609 ? > Lore also has them: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-renesas-soc/20200227181018.5nixs7o7lght3mug@localhost/T/#m2ec32842569b4b4dc25d4ecda668e509edaba98b > > Perhaps they got lost on the path to your inbox? Recently I had a similar > problem with some patches, which appeared at the list and patchwork, but > never in my (Gmail) inbox. This is how the email I got looked like: From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> To: "Linuxkernel+Patchwork-Soc via Email Integration" <patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be> Subject: [GIT PULL 1/5] Renesas ARM DT updates for v5.7 Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 12:02:17 +0100 Message-Id: <20200226110221.19288-2-geert+renesas@glider.be> In-Reply-To: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> References: <20200226110221.19288-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> Precedence: Bulk List-Unsubscribe: <https://linux.kernel.org/g/patchwork-soc/unsub> Sender: patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org List-Id: <patchwork-soc.linux.kernel.org> Mailing-List: list patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org; contact patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org Delivered-To: mailing list <patchwork-soc@linux.kernel.org> Reply-To: patchwork-soc+owner@linux.kernel.org It no longer had the {arm,soc}@kernel.org recipients on it, instead the internal-only mailing list that connects soc@kernel.org with patchwork. Very odd. Reply-to rewrites are undesirable too. Konstantin, anything on your side that can shed light on this? My mail filters locally expects to see soc@kernel.org and arm@kernel.org recipients still intact in the to-line, and it's really odd that 2 of the 5 emails looked as expected. -Olof