Message ID | 20200710191122.11029-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Exynos5422 DMC: adjust to new devfreq monitoring mechanism | expand |
Hi Lukasz, On 7/11/20 4:11 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a v2 patch set adjusting Exynos5422 DMC to the new devfreq monitoring > mechanism. This time the IRQ mode is explicitly controlled using module > parameter (in default the driver uses polling mode = devfreq monitoring). > > The detailed cover letter describing the topic can be found here [1]. > > The patches should apply on top of Chanwoo's devfreq-next branch, where > the new devfreq mechanism is queued [2]. If there is no objections > I think they can go via this tree, since they logically use it. > > Changes: > v2: > - added Reviewed-by from Chanwoo for patch 1/2 > - added module_param which controls the mode in which the driver operates > - switched in default to devfreq monitoring mechanism instead of interrupts > > Regards, > Lukasz Luba > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200708153420.29484-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-next > > Lukasz Luba (2): > memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Adjust polling interval and > uptreshold > memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Add module param to control IRQ mode > > drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 13 +++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > Applied them to devfreq-next branch. Thanks.
On 7/24/20 2:40 AM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > Hi Lukasz, > > On 7/11/20 4:11 AM, Lukasz Luba wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is a v2 patch set adjusting Exynos5422 DMC to the new devfreq monitoring >> mechanism. This time the IRQ mode is explicitly controlled using module >> parameter (in default the driver uses polling mode = devfreq monitoring). >> >> The detailed cover letter describing the topic can be found here [1]. >> >> The patches should apply on top of Chanwoo's devfreq-next branch, where >> the new devfreq mechanism is queued [2]. If there is no objections >> I think they can go via this tree, since they logically use it. >> >> Changes: >> v2: >> - added Reviewed-by from Chanwoo for patch 1/2 >> - added module_param which controls the mode in which the driver operates >> - switched in default to devfreq monitoring mechanism instead of interrupts >> >> Regards, >> Lukasz Luba >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200708153420.29484-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com/ >> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/linux.git/log/?h=devfreq-next >> >> Lukasz Luba (2): >> memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Adjust polling interval and >> uptreshold >> memory: samsung: exynos5422-dmc: Add module param to control IRQ mode >> >> drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 13 +++++++++---- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> > > Applied them to devfreq-next branch. Thanks. > Thank you Chanwoo Regards, Lukasz