From patchwork Thu Nov 12 18:35:33 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nishanth Menon X-Patchwork-Id: 11901027 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC7EC55ABD for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBEE22227 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="VMIDq03q"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="DKapKsBV" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1FBEE22227 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Owner; bh=V51yv8uzmLfs8OiDheimQlGY9GNZyfU4e+dewoUspDg=; b=VMIDq03qT3qrzD+bDyG3QghxeX +mpwGj3lSF5WF3bcKGxKOKHmt4VGFYN40xvvMz99eJ2DyDMX8PruKLUdE61b7yweSv2cQh8j485j9 dcaK4NVOCsgaasgelXoN2HMDBIbsc9SR4kJKdGb2lpotqDRQk4lfPr+XAM5opmRw089q43+ngX2jt qydzHPvEt3wcEchd9Qxa39ooKmRqM83Yia0r4S1d54m5Fw+970Bn7I3d6dHTVLtMCZ/H6R1dKofTU J6KZvpQM5qunrlXTgS2badRrfV7hVjsdXLm1FaW/yeoJKUWFbW6Gw4lhnsKkkZK+eZMpb6x9o8gT6 /GqcMmgg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdHRu-0008Di-EW; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:35:58 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kdHRi-0008A5-2K for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:35:49 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACIZg6b043383; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:35:42 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1605206142; bh=L+/f7LbYwAqShIZzPwGgs/3FGHnnQPTqggOn1xmq7wM=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date; b=DKapKsBV4liJggTTzIPyD0bW2DW/O5v1H02NmCu8Ba0d1+vtWzztweDpja9vm19gX W+YPUJv/F1xvcu7q8nHtnNA8WPzYVERZHePWcQN31P1qgJh7sT5Rf+8UGuo5dSecRV KIlDIuwiEu0dpPKBPf76tAZZWI5yxLEDUwbTltC0= Received: from DLEE105.ent.ti.com (dlee105.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.35]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0ACIZgxW090290 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:35:42 -0600 Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) by DLEE105.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:35:41 -0600 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:35:42 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0ACIZfe1128879; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:35:41 -0600 From: Nishanth Menon To: Roger Quadros , Keerthy , Jyri Sarha , Tomi Valkeinen , Peter Ujfalusi , Lokesh Vutla , Rob Herring , Tony Lindgren , Tero Kristo Subject: [PATCH V3 0/5] arm64: dts: ti: Cleanup mix of "okay" and "disabled" Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:35:33 -0600 Message-ID: <20201112183538.6805-1-nm@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201112_133546_468866_3ABA26A8 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Changes since v2[3]: - Rebase on top of ti-k3-dts-next (no functional changes) - picked up reviewed-by and acks from folks. Since we have all the required acks and reviews, I will apply this series tomorrow morning since this can cause churn for other folks. Changes since v1[1]: - Picked up Reviews from Tomi - Added patch #5 for moving uart used by firmware to 'reserved' state (thanks Peter for pointing it out) - Updated commit message of #1, #2 to add information about the limitation as well (thanks Peter for your inputs). This is hopefully a conclusion of the thread we had (online[2] and offline). There are few options one could take when dealing with SoC dtsi and board dts a. SoC dtsi provide nodes as a super-set default (aka enabled) state and to prevent messy board files, when more boards are added per SoC, we optimize and disable commonly un-used nodes in board-common.dtsi b. SoC dtsi disables all hardware dependent nodes by default and board dts files enable nodes based on a need basis. c. Subjectively pick and choose which nodes we will disable by default in SoC dtsi and over the years we can optimize things and change default state depending on the need. While there are pros and cons on each of these approaches, the right thing to do will be to stick with device tree default standards and work within those established rules. So, we choose to go with option (a). NOTE: There is a known risk of "omission" that new board dts developers might miss reviewing both the board schematics in addition to all the dt nodes of the SoC when setting appropriate nodes status to "disable" or "reserved" in the board dts. This can expose issues in drivers which may not anticipate an incomplete node(example: missing appropriate board properties) being in "okay" state. These cases are considered as bugs and need to be fixed in the drivers as and when identified. Nishanth Menon (5): arm64: dts: ti: k3-am65*: Cleanup disabled nodes at SoC dtsi level arm64: dts: ti: k3-j721e*: Cleanup disabled nodes at SoC dtsi level arm64: dts: ti: am65/j721e: Fix up un-necessary status set to "okay" for crypto arm64: dts: ti: k3-am654-base-board: Fix up un-necessary status set to "okay" for USB arm64: dts: ti: am65/j721e/j7200: Mark firmware used uart as "reserved" arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 9 ---- .../arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am654-base-board.dts | 26 ++++++---- .../dts/ti/k3-j7200-common-proc-board.dts | 4 +- .../dts/ti/k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dts | 50 ++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-j721e-main.dtsi | 28 ----------- 5 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201104224356.18040-1-nm@ti.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201027130701.GE5639@atomide.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201112014929.25227-1-nm@ti.com/