Message ID | 20201126155421.14901-1-dbrazdil@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Opt-in always-on nVHE hypervisor | expand |
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:53:58PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote: > The hypervisor starts trapping host SMCs and intercepting host's PSCI > CPU_ON/SUSPEND calls. It replaces the host's entry point with its own, > initializes the EL2 state of the new CPU and installs the nVHE hyp vector > before ERETing to the host's entry point. I hate CPU people. This is complete gibberish to anyone who doesn't already have their head deep in ... whatever you're talking about.
On 2020-11-26 15:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:53:58PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote: >> The hypervisor starts trapping host SMCs and intercepting host's PSCI >> CPU_ON/SUSPEND calls. It replaces the host's entry point with its own, >> initializes the EL2 state of the new CPU and installs the nVHE hyp >> vector >> before ERETing to the host's entry point. > > I hate CPU people. This is complete gibberish to anyone who doesn't > already have their head deep in ... whatever you're talking about. What I hate the most is people having a go at other people because they don't understand what is being discussed. Who is at fault there? M.
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 04:19:55PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-11-26 15:57, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 03:53:58PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote: > > > The hypervisor starts trapping host SMCs and intercepting host's PSCI > > > CPU_ON/SUSPEND calls. It replaces the host's entry point with its own, > > > initializes the EL2 state of the new CPU and installs the nVHE hyp > > > vector > > > before ERETing to the host's entry point. > > > > I hate CPU people. This is complete gibberish to anyone who doesn't > > already have their head deep in ... whatever you're talking about. > > What I hate the most is people having a go at other people because they > don't understand what is being discussed. Who is at fault there? The person who wrote an explanation that doesn't actually explain anything? If you're sending mail to a bunch of mailing lists which aren't already familiar with what you're trying to do, the onus is on you to do more explanation.