Message ID | 20201130233442.2562064-1-samitolvanen@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | scs: switch to vmapped shadow stacks | expand |
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:34:40 -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > As discussed a few months ago [1][2], virtually mapped shadow call stacks > are better for safety and robustness. This series dusts off the VMAP > option from the original SCS patch series and switches the kernel to use > virtually mapped shadow stacks unconditionally when SCS is enabled. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200515172355.GD23334@willie-the-truck/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200427220942.GB80713@google.com/ > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/scs), thanks! [1/2] scs: switch to vmapped shadow stacks https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a2abe7cbd8fe [2/2] arm64: scs: use vmapped IRQ and SDEI shadow stacks https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ac20ffbb0279 I also threw a patch on top implementing the suggestion I made on v2, so please take a look if you get a chance. Cheers,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 3:40 AM Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:34:40 -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > As discussed a few months ago [1][2], virtually mapped shadow call stacks > > are better for safety and robustness. This series dusts off the VMAP > > option from the original SCS patch series and switches the kernel to use > > virtually mapped shadow stacks unconditionally when SCS is enabled. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200515172355.GD23334@willie-the-truck/ > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200427220942.GB80713@google.com/ > > > > [...] > > Applied to arm64 (for-next/scs), thanks! > > [1/2] scs: switch to vmapped shadow stacks > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/a2abe7cbd8fe > [2/2] arm64: scs: use vmapped IRQ and SDEI shadow stacks > https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/ac20ffbb0279 > > I also threw a patch on top implementing the suggestion I made on v2, so > please take a look if you get a chance. Looks good to me, thanks for cleaning that up! Sami