| Message ID | 20210526214917.20099-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm64: Implement stack trace reliability checks | expand |
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:49:15PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: > From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> > > There are a number of places in kernel code where the stack trace is not > reliable. Enhance the unwinder to check for those cases and mark the > stack trace as unreliable. Once all of the checks are in place, the unwinder Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Hi Mark Rutland, Could you please review this patch series when you get a chance? I would really like to get a confirmation from you that there are no gaps in this. Thanks in advance! Madhavan On 6/4/21 10:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 04:49:15PM -0500, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com wrote: >> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> >> >> There are a number of places in kernel code where the stack trace is not >> reliable. Enhance the unwinder to check for those cases and mark the >> stack trace as unreliable. Once all of the checks are in place, the unwinder > > Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> >
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> There are a number of places in kernel code where the stack trace is not reliable. Enhance the unwinder to check for those cases and mark the stack trace as unreliable. Once all of the checks are in place, the unwinder can provide a reliable stack trace. But before this can be used for livepatch, some other entity needs to guarantee that the frame pointers are all set up correctly in kernel functions. objtool is currently being worked on to address that need. Return address check ==================== Check the return PC of every stack frame to make sure that it is a valid kernel text address (and not some generated code, for example). If it is not a valid kernel text address, mark the stack trace as unreliable. Assembly functions ================== There are a number of assembly functions in arm64. Except for a couple of them, these functions do not have a frame pointer prolog or epilog. Also, many of them manipulate low-level state such as registers. These functions are, by definition, unreliable from a stack unwinding perspective. That is, when these functions occur in a stack trace, the unwinder would not be able to unwind through them reliably. Assembly functions are defined as SYM_FUNC_*() functions or SYM_CODE_*() functions. objtool peforms static analysis of SYM_FUNC functions. It ignores SYM_CODE functions because they have low level code that is difficult to analyze. When objtool becomes ready eventually, SYM_FUNC functions will be analyzed and "fixed" as necessary. So, they are not "interesting" for the reliable unwinder. That leaves SYM_CODE functions. It is for the unwinder to deal with these for reliable stack trace. The unwinder needs to do the following: - Recognize SYM_CODE functions in a stack trace. - If a particular SYM_CODE function can be unwinded through using some special logic, then do it. E.g., the return trampoline for Function Graph Tracing. - Otherwise, mark the stack trace unreliable. Previous approach ================= Previously, I considered a per-section approach. The following sections mostly contain SYM_CODE functions: .entry.text .idmap.text .hyp.idmap.text .hyp.text .hibernate_exit.text .entry.tramp.text So, consider the whole sections unreliable. I created an array of code ranges, one for each section. The unwinder then checks each return PC against these sections. If there is a match, the stack trace is unreliable. Although this approach is reasonable, there are two problems: 1. There are SYM_FUNC functions in these sections. They also "become" unreliable in this approach. I think that we should be able to specify which functions are reliable and which ones are not in any section. 2. There are a few SYM_CODE functions in .text and .init.text. These sections contain tons of functions that are reliable. So, I considered moving the SYM_CODE functions into a separate section called ".code.text". I am not convinced that this approach is fine: - We should be able to place functions in .text and .init.text, if we wanted to. - Moving the hypervisor related functions caused reloc issues. - Moving things around just to satisfy the unwinder did not seem right. Current approach ================ In this version, I have taken a simpler approach to solve the issues mentioned before. Define an ARM64 version of SYM_CODE_END() like this: #define SYM_CODE_END(name) \ SYM_END(name, SYM_T_NONE) ;\ 99: ;\ .pushsection "sym_code_functions", "aw" ;\ .quad name ;\ .quad 99b ;\ .popsection NOTE: I use the numeric label 99 as the end address of a function. It does not conflict with anything right now. Please let me know if this is OK. I can add a comment that the label 99 is reserved and should not be used by assembly code. The above macro does the usual SYM_END(). In addition, it records the function's address range in a special section called "sym_code_functions". This way, all SYM_CODE functions get recorded in the section automatically. Implement an early_initcall() called init_sym_code_functions() that allocates an array called sym_code_functions[] and copies the function ranges from the section to the array. Implement an unwinder_is_unreliable() function that compares a return PC to the ranges. If there is a match, return true. Else, return false. Call unwinder_is_unreliable() on every return PC from unwind_frame(). If there is a match, then mark the stack trace as unreliable. Last stack frame ================ If a SYM_CODE function occurs in the very last frame in the stack trace, then the stack trace is not considered unreliable. This is because there is no more unwinding to do. Examples: - EL0 exception stack traces end in the top level EL0 exception handlers. - All kernel thread stack traces end in ret_from_fork(). Special SYM_CODE functions ========================== The return trampolines of the Function Graph Tracer and Kretprobe can be recognized by the unwinder. If the return PCs can be translated to the original PCs, then, the unwinder should perform that translation before checking for reliability. The final PC that we end up with after all the translations is the one we need to check for reliability. Accordingly, I have moved the reliability checks to after the logic that handles the Function Graph Tracer. So, the approach is - all SYM_CODE functions are unreliable. If a SYM_CODE function is "fixed" to make it reliable, then it should become a SYM_FUNC function. Or, if the unwinder has special logic to unwind through a SYM_CODE function, then that can be done. Previously, I had some extra code to handle the Function Graph Trace return trampoline case. I have removed it. Special casing is orthogonal to this work and can be done separately. Documentation ============= Documentation/livepatch/reliable-stacktrace.rst written by Mark Rutland gives a list of requirements for a reliable unwinder. I have added sufficient comments in the code so that it is easy to map the requirements to the code in the unwinder. I have also moved some comments from the previous cover letter to the code. Performance =========== Currently, unwinder_is_unreliable() does a linear search through sym_code_functions[]. If reviewers prefer, I could sort the sym_code_functions[] array and perform a binary search for better performance. There are about 80 entries in the array. Checkpatch ========== I am getting the following error on SYM_CODE_END() that I have defined for arm64. These macros are only used in assembly. I am not sure how to deal with these. Can someone help? ERROR: Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while loop #13: FILE: arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h:67: +#define SYM_CODE_END(name) \ + SYM_END(name, SYM_T_NONE) ;\ + 99: ;\ + .pushsection "sym_code_functions", "aw" ;\ + .quad name ;\ + .quad 99b ;\ + .popsection CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'name' - possible side-effects? #13: FILE: arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h:67: +#define SYM_CODE_END(name) \ + SYM_END(name, SYM_T_NONE) ;\ + 99: ;\ + .pushsection "sym_code_functions", "aw" ;\ + .quad name ;\ + .quad 99b ;\ + .popsection ERROR: spaces required around that ':' (ctx:VxW) #15: FILE: arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h:69: + 99: ;\ ^ WARNING: labels should not be indented #15: FILE: arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h:69: + 99: ;\ total: 2 errors, 1 warnings, 1 checks, 171 lines checked --- Changelog: v5: From Keiya Nobuta: - The term blacklist(ed) is not to be used anymore. I have changed it to unreliable. So, the function unwinder_blacklisted() has been changed to unwinder_is_unreliable(). From Mark Brown: - Add a comment for the "reliable" flag in struct stackframe. The reliability attribute is not complete until all the checks are in place. Added a comment above struct stackframe. - Include some of the comments in the cover letter in the actual code so that we can compare it with the reliable stack trace requirements document for completeness. I have added a comment: - above unwinder_is_unreliable() that lists the requirements that are addressed by the function. - above the __kernel_text_address() call about all the cases the call covers. v4: From Mark Brown: - I was checking the return PC with __kernel_text_address() before the Function Graph trace handling. Mark Brown felt that all the reliability checks should be performed on the original return PC once that is obtained. So, I have moved all the reliability checks to after the Function Graph Trace handling code in the unwinder. Basically, the unwinder should perform PC translations first (for rhe return trampoline for Function Graph Tracing, Kretprobes, etc). Then, the reliability checks should be applied to the resulting PC. - Mark said to improve the naming of the new functions so they don't collide with existing ones. I have used a prefix "unwinder_" for all the new functions. From Josh Poimboeuf: - In the error scenarios in the unwinder, the reliable flag in the stack frame should be set. Implemented this. - Some of the other comments are not relevant to the new code as I have taken a different approach in the new code. That is why I have not made those changes. E.g., Ard wanted me to add the "const" keyword to the global section array. That array does not exist in v4. Similarly, Mark Brown said to use ARRAY_SIZE() for the same array in a for loop. Other changes: - Add a new definition for SYM_CODE_END() that adds the address range of the function to a special section called "sym_code_functions". - Include the new section under initdata in vmlinux.lds.S. - Define an early_initcall() to copy the contents of the "sym_code_functions" section to an array by the same name. - Define a function unwinder_blacklisted() that compares a return PC against sym_code_sections[]. If there is a match, mark the stack trace unreliable. Call this from unwind_frame(). v3: - Implemented a sym_code_ranges[] array to contains sections bounds for text sections that contain SYM_CODE_*() functions. The unwinder checks each return PC against the sections. If it falls in any of the sections, the stack trace is marked unreliable. - Moved SYM_CODE functions from .text and .init.text into a new text section called ".code.text". Added this section to vmlinux.lds.S and sym_code_ranges[]. - Fixed the logic in the unwinder that handles Function Graph Tracer return trampoline. - Removed all the previous code that handles: - ftrace entry code for traced function - special_functions[] array that lists individual functions - kretprobe_trampoline() special case v2 - Removed the terminating entry { 0, 0 } in special_functions[] and replaced it with the idiom { /* sentinel */ }. - Change the ftrace trampoline entry ftrace_graph_call in special_functions[] to ftrace_call + 4 and added explanatory comments. - Unnested #ifdefs in special_functions[] for FTRACE. v1 - Define a bool field in struct stackframe. This will indicate if a stack trace is reliable. - Implement a special_functions[] array that will be populated with special functions in which the stack trace is considered unreliable. - Using kallsyms_lookup(), get the address ranges for the special functions and record them. - Implement an is_reliable_function(pc). This function will check if a given return PC falls in any of the special functions. If it does, the stack trace is unreliable. - Implement check_reliability() function that will check if a stack frame is reliable. Call is_reliable_function() from check_reliability(). - Before a return PC is checked against special_funtions[], it must be validates as a proper kernel text address. Call __kernel_text_address() from check_reliability(). - Finally, call check_reliability() from unwind_frame() for each stack frame. - Add EL1 exception handlers to special_functions[]. el1_sync(); el1_irq(); el1_error(); el1_sync_invalid(); el1_irq_invalid(); el1_fiq_invalid(); el1_error_invalid(); - The above functions are currently defined as LOCAL symbols. Make them global so that they can be referenced from the unwinder code. - Add FTRACE trampolines to special_functions[]: ftrace_graph_call() ftrace_graph_caller() return_to_handler() - Add the kretprobe trampoline to special functions[]: kretprobe_trampoline() Previous versions and discussion ================================ v4: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210516040018.128105-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com/ v3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210503173615.21576-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com/ v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210405204313.21346-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com/ v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210330190955.13707-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com/ Madhavan T. Venkataraman (2): arm64: Introduce stack trace reliability checks in the unwinder arm64: Create a list of SYM_CODE functions, check return PC against list arch/arm64/include/asm/linkage.h | 12 +++ arch/arm64/include/asm/sections.h | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 9 ++ arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 7 ++ 5 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) base-commit: bf05bf16c76bb44ab5156223e1e58e26dfe30a88