Message ID | 20240702075742.945768-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ARM: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES | expand |
Gentle ping. On 2024/7/2 15:57, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > Currently, almost all architectures have switched to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, > except for arm32. Also switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, which can also > make the code more concise. > > Jinjie Ruan (2): > ARM: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() > ARM: Convert to arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable() > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/arm/include/asm/cpu.h | 1 - > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++------------ > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:52:07AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > On 2024/7/2 15:57, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > > Currently, almost all architectures have switched to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, > > except for arm32. Also switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, which can also > > make the code more concise. > > > > Jinjie Ruan (2): > > ARM: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() > > ARM: Convert to arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable() > > > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + > > arch/arm/include/asm/cpu.h | 1 - > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++------------ > > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) I think it's fine, but it needs to end up in the patch system to be applied. Thanks.
On 2024/7/31 16:27, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 09:52:07AM +0800, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >> On 2024/7/2 15:57, Jinjie Ruan wrote: >>> Currently, almost all architectures have switched to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, >>> except for arm32. Also switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES, which can also >>> make the code more concise. >>> >>> Jinjie Ruan (2): >>> ARM: Switch over to GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES using arch_register_cpu() >>> ARM: Convert to arch_cpu_is_hotpluggable() >>> >>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + >>> arch/arm/include/asm/cpu.h | 1 - >>> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 14 ++------------ >>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > I think it's fine, but it needs to end up in the patch system to be > applied. Thanks. Hi, Russell Thank you very much! I'll push it in rmk's patch tracker sooner. >