mbox series

[v3,00/26] mm: introduce numa_memblks

Message ID 20240801060826.559858-1-rppt@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series mm: introduce numa_memblks | expand

Message

Mike Rapoport Aug. 1, 2024, 6:08 a.m. UTC
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>

Hi,

Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on
arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to
the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on
loongarch sometime later.

While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows,
it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks
does implement this.

Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64
and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no
fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms.
Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT
more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden.

And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA
emulation on arm64 and riscv.

The first 9 commits in this series are cleanups that are not strictly
related to numa_memblks.
Commits 10-16 slightly reorder code in x86 to allow extracting numa_memblks
and NUMA emulation to the generic code.
Commits 17-19 actually move the code from arch/x86/ to mm/ and commits 20-22
does some aftermath cleanups.
Commit 23 updates of_numa_init() to return error of no NUMA nodes were
found in the device tree.
Commit 24 switches arch_numa to numa_memblks.
Commit 25 enables usage of phys_to_target_node() and
memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() with numa_memblks.
Commit 26 moves the description for numa=fake from x86 to admin-guide.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240723064156.4009477-1-rppt@kernel.org
* rebase on v6.11-rc1
* fix dummy_numa_init() in arch_numa, thanks Zi Yan
* update of_numa_init() to return error of no NUMA nodes were
* add Tested-by, thanks Zi Yan

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240716111346.3676969-1-rppt@kernel.org
* add cleanup for arch_alloc_nodedata and HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
* add patch that moves description of numa=fake kernel parameter from
  x86 to admin-guide
* reduce rounding up of node_data allocations from PAGE_SIZE to
  SMP_CACHE_BYTES
* restore single allocation attempt of numa_distance
* fix several comments
* added review tags

Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) (26):
  mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/
  MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other architectures
  MIPS: sgi-ip27: ensure node_possible_map only contains valid nodes
  MIPS: sgi-ip27: drop HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
  MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data
  MIPS: loongson64: drop HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
  mm: drop CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_NODEDATA_EXTENSION
  arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code
  arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA to generic code
  x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation
  x86/numa: use get_pfn_range_for_nid to verify that node spans memory
  x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu
  x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist
  x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function
  x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN
  x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned
  mm: introduce numa_memblks
  mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks
  mm: introduce numa_emulation
  mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_memblks_init
  mm: numa_memblks: make several functions and variables static
  mm: numa_memblks: use memblock_{start,end}_of_DRAM() when sanitizing
    meminfo
  of, numa: return -EINVAL when no numa-node-id is found
  arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks
  mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks
  docs: move numa=fake description to kernel-parameters.txt

 .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  15 +
 .../arch/x86/x86_64/boot-options.rst          |  12 -
 arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild                 |   1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h               |  13 -
 arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h             |   1 +
 arch/loongarch/include/asm/Kbuild             |   1 +
 arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h           |  16 -
 arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h         |   1 +
 arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c                  |  21 -
 arch/mips/Kconfig                             |   5 -
 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h      |   1 -
 .../mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/mmzone.h |   4 -
 arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c                   |  28 +-
 arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c              |  12 +-
 arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-smp.c                 |   2 +
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmzone.h             |   6 -
 arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c                        |  26 +-
 arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild                 |   1 +
 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               |  13 -
 arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h             |   4 +
 arch/s390/include/asm/Kbuild                  |   1 +
 arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h                |  17 -
 arch/s390/kernel/numa.c                       |   3 -
 arch/sh/include/asm/mmzone.h                  |   3 -
 arch/sh/mm/init.c                             |   7 +-
 arch/sh/mm/numa.c                             |   3 -
 arch/sparc/include/asm/mmzone.h               |   4 -
 arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c                       |  11 +-
 arch/x86/Kconfig                              |   9 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild                   |   1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h                 |   6 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h              |  17 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h              |  18 -
 arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h                   |  26 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h              |   9 -
 arch/x86/mm/Makefile                          |   1 -
 arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c                     |   1 +
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c                            | 618 +-----------------
 arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h                   |  24 -
 drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c                      |   1 +
 drivers/base/Kconfig                          |   1 +
 drivers/base/arch_numa.c                      | 224 ++-----
 drivers/cxl/Kconfig                           |   2 +-
 drivers/dax/Kconfig                           |   2 +-
 drivers/of/of_numa.c                          |   5 +-
 include/asm-generic/mmzone.h                  |   5 +
 include/asm-generic/numa.h                    |   6 +-
 include/linux/memory_hotplug.h                |  48 --
 include/linux/numa.h                          |   5 +
 include/linux/numa_memblks.h                  |  58 ++
 kernel/Makefile                               |   1 -
 kernel/numa.c                                 |  26 -
 mm/Kconfig                                    |  11 +
 mm/Makefile                                   |   3 +
 mm/mm_init.c                                  |   3 +-
 mm/numa.c                                     |  57 ++
 {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c          |  42 +-
 mm/numa_memblks.c                             | 568 ++++++++++++++++
 58 files changed, 870 insertions(+), 1160 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h
 delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h
 create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/mmzone.h
 create mode 100644 include/linux/numa_memblks.h
 delete mode 100644 kernel/numa.c
 create mode 100644 mm/numa.c
 rename {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c (94%)
 create mode 100644 mm/numa_memblks.c


base-commit: 8400291e289ee6b2bf9779ff1c83a291501f017b

Comments

Jonathan Cameron Aug. 2, 2024, 4:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu,  1 Aug 2024 09:08:00 +0300
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:

> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on
> arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to
> the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on
> loongarch sometime later.
> 
> While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows,
> it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks
> does implement this.
> 
> Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64
> and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no
> fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms.
> Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT
> more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden.
> 
> And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA
> emulation on arm64 and riscv.

Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> #arm64 + CXL via QEMU
With that one fix in patch 7.

Feel free to figure out which patches actually got tested by that
(or tag them all - I'll pretend I tested ip27 :)

Jonathan
Dan Williams Aug. 5, 2024, 7:41 p.m. UTC | #2
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on
> arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to
> the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on
> loongarch sometime later.
> 
> While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows,
> it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks
> does implement this.
> 
> Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64
> and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no
> fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms.
> Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT
> more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden.
> 
> And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA
> emulation on arm64 and riscv.

Hey Mike,

So interesting to see this come full circle and instead of moving
numa_memblks to memblock, just uplevel numa_memblks. From the
perspective of having numa_memblks enhancements work for more
architectures this gets an enthusiastic thumbs up from me. Let me go
look at the details...