Message ID | 20241029-arm-generic-entry-v2-0-573519abef38@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16ED6D2AB1D for <linux-arm-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:10:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date:Subject: From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: List-Owner; bh=pOU2at/tY3wxqYqK5srfwiMdhD8Qv79B8bwqyosCpDo=; b=JCR8C4YfzS3Noy T/wInUE6AyK/JoZqSfDSc+bRHQLQmCQRmg9um9mnzDUh6ceJiWf4/xuQzIY6dqI/RXdQdR6diN7dF uQOWRd44aRFFDuk5PrsVTmgmqCWsL8gByCcXheQZZmwMaA0SULDTtMTwfClqqoEmSLHsmt/6Ays1l JBhQl0PCa69BNOD5+ieuXaFyKUAtiWDonlr6GhZ+haCuXXpAps6kCuzk296xZ/4D/oCvX57GEhBgz GVgVXLp3KkhOKOccEMyGzqtneLj4yZOor//gDEYqL+RYPA+G+Zo+HwDfancBeT3RI2XF1H4+Sit2C k2dWqD73VAggBf4tbXpg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t5k76-0000000EBlP-2HHW; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:10:16 +0000 Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1t5jqC-0000000E7C2-1V6q for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 10:52:50 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539f72c8fc1so6476005e87.1 for <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 03:52:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1730199166; x=1730803966; darn=lists.infradead.org; h=cc:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :subject:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pOU2at/tY3wxqYqK5srfwiMdhD8Qv79B8bwqyosCpDo=; b=N3Ah+tWCesVKUyRWuxrEty04jA/yRfSbV3r/UnkFVGrwthOMWfByD2578M16MyHA3O I38mkMrm38pAen2HMmqvYe9xAPsRhj1xS8ERHEHhA2ypzQ9DfRCzUug9vB/gqqTlaoER zU7XlxCv2chLWLgdSysHN54+tq/yFdBb52RW8O9W3qwzTf9Dw/sq6HKYd5e+P6nJOvF3 r+WXX5FgzeIsWzbStVI12254nQninajLeG6B1OIJ08fRAE2etZZGfc1evqEnVdLVfFir ApPW74Bvx/1LfWceZAsRraAzDYl13I1B6IElTWKUZCxARWsXVlFgiFYf67rx3yA/UAiJ mg3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1730199166; x=1730803966; h=cc:to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date :subject:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=pOU2at/tY3wxqYqK5srfwiMdhD8Qv79B8bwqyosCpDo=; b=tDPd1ewsXKZzAMdwK2rYVbQhABdCdYewxdm/BlCHM5Y4ZxELRyWoSXkZOEjs9EPx0j DwtFQ6IusZ1x7l0+Ls54gRJoUt59mfbEyr11Ipx8Vdm8rB3roHPfnhm8T6fDAwOwFVx7 hopA+qDrUEpGjiMMunzuprQJl84r5nUy09IyGnAjQifS9hozvyQJf6lynCNaeVSRG6FV qcZL/UmE00sVrfzSYVXSF+7865+KwnB2J44Iso5ZvLHSGMX+8uiTw3Vct7VSHsc+aAGs 2ohNzdANupwfEIawIRXJGR6CdsqthJ4BpArbAwjTkKuataWVITJaHmggvboqKvTAcOn8 Nn1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzq6XIDe15Ekb2iRHF4hoS3PzIC2VrVlatl77Bz4b2SXPhZc3zl /E4Dv2K5xsHKM3lEKrKuXVaAJdKQMrGLZlt8GxII9aToW88kv8AIL4tvxOR+mhY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGZsGrI+Wje0AWMboh61HWlxN5Py1N1bq48j9U0oZT95pWYVIQhjG50/1Fk/KCarp30cbOBoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:1113:b0:539:faef:35ec with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53b34a32081mr5099260e87.49.1730199166240; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 03:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lino.lan ([85.235.12.238]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2adb3069b0e04-53b2e12452fsm1351307e87.73.2024.10.29.03.52.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2024 03:52:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 00/28] ARM: Switch to generic entry Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:52:40 +0100 Message-Id: <20241029-arm-generic-entry-v2-0-573519abef38@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-B4-Tracking: v=1; b=H4sIAHm+IGcC/22NwQqDMBBEf6XsuVs2GlF7KhT6Ab0WD4muGmiTs hGpiP/e1HOPM8N7s0JkcRzhfFhBeHbRBZ9CdjxAOxo/MLouZcgo01RTjkZeOLBPVIvsJ1nQdEb pIi8raxkS9xbu3Wd3PuB+u0KTytHFKciy/8xqn35KRYr+KGeFhLbWvS5UR1VpL0/njYRTkAGab du++u6slrgAAAA= To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20241029_035248_518049_EEB3F335 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 36.05 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: <linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/> List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>, <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe> Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org> Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org |
Series |
ARM: Switch to generic entry
|
expand
|
This patch series converts a slew of ARM assembly into the corresponding C code, step by step moving the codebase closer to the expectations of the generic entry code, and as a last step switches ARM over to the generic entry code. This was inspired by Jinjie Ruans similar work for ARM64. The low-level assembly calls into arch/arm/kernel/syscall.c to invoke syscalls from userspace, and to the functions listed in arch/arm/kernel/entry.c for any other transitions to and from userspace. Looking at these functions and the call sites in the assembly on the final result should give a pretty good idea about how this works, and what the generic entry expects from an architecture. To test the code the following seccomp patch is needed on older ARM systems: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241022-seccomp-compile-error-v2-1-c9f08a4f8ebb@linaro.org/ (patch queued by Kees Cook) There is a git branch you can pull in and test (v6.12-rc1 based): https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-integrator.git/log/?h=b4/arm-generic-entry-v6.12-rc1 Upsides: - Same code paths as x86, S390, RISCV, Loongarch and probably soon ARM64 is used for the ARM systems. This includes some instrumentation stubs helping out with things we haven't even started to look at such as kmsan and live patching (!). - By introducing the new callbacks to C, we can move away from the deprecated (and I think partly unmaintained) context tracking mechanism for RCU (user_exit_callable(), user_enter_callable()) in favor of what everyone else is using, i.e. calling rcu_irq_enter_check_tick() on IRQ entry. If we do not go with this patch set we can perhaps look into a separate patch just switching ARM32 to the new context tracking, as tests show the performance impact appears negligible for this. - I think also lockdep is now behaving more according to expectations (the lockdep calls in ARM64 and generic entry seems different and more fine-granular from the ARM32 code) but I am no expert in lockdep so I cannot really tell if this is a real improvement. Downsides: - I had to remove the "fast syscall restart" from Al Viro. I don't know how much it will affect performance, but if this is something we must have, let's try to make the solution generic, i.e. add fast syscall restart in the generic entry code. - The "superfast return to userspace" using just very small assembly snippets to get back to userspace on e.g. IRQs if and only if no instrumentation was compiled in, is no longer possible, since we unconditionally call into code written in C. I *think* this accounts for the majority of the ~3-4% performance impact (see measurements below). Testing: - Booted into Versatile Express QEMU (ARMv7), Ux500 full graphic UI (PostmarketOS Phosh, ARMv7 on hardware, Gemini ARMv4 on hardware. No special issues. - Tested some ptrace/strace obviously, such as issuing several instances of "ptrace find /" and let this scroll by in the terminal over some 10 minutes or so. - Turned on RCU torture tests and ran for a while. Seems stable and the test outputs look normal. - Ran stress-ng, which triggers the idle bug below that also appear during boot. Performance impact: The changes were tested using the standard syscall overhead testing oneliner: perf bench syscall all This executes 10,000,000 getppid() in sequence and measures the time taken for this to complete. The numbers vary a bit but they are consistent. In QEMU I tested with Vexpress and two CPU cores (-M vexpress-a15 -m 2G -smp cpus=2). DRM graphics and framebuffer was activated to give a bit of background IRQ activity (vsync interrupts). I ran the perf command three times on each configuration, and picked the one iteration where the original code performed the best, and the one where the patches kernel performed the worst, to get a worst-case comparison. v6.12-rc1 vexpress_defconfig, best invocation: Total time: 150.723 [sec] 15.072301 usecs/op 66,346 ops/sec v6.12-rc1 vexpress_defconfig, and this patch set, worst invocation: Total time: 158.746 [sec] 15.874603 usecs/op 62,993 ops/sec Here we see a performance degradation of around 4% operations/sec for a vexpress dualcore defconfig. Debians stock kernel was noticably faster, so I investigated what causes this. It turns out that the big performance hog for syscalls is actually PAN, and I think Debian armhf simply turns this off. So I re-did the tests with CONFIG_ARM_PAN turned off to emulate the impact on stock Debian: v6.12-rc1 vexpress_defconfig, !PAN, best invocation: Total time: 38.022 [sec] 3.802206 usecs/op 263,005 ops/sec v6.12-rc1 vexpress_defconfig, !PAN and this patch set, worst invocation: Total time: 39.015 [sec] 3.901549 usecs/op 256,308 ops/sec Again we see around 4% (well just 3% actually). The overhead seems a little less pronounced when not using PAN. To conclude if any of this was due to the new context tracking, I tested to patch back the old context tracking on top of generic entry. This is hardly something that can be recommended, and anyway showed no noticeable overhead difference. Caveats - This comes up during boot and stress-ng runs: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/context_tracking.c:128 ct_kernel_exit+0xf8/0x100 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #31 Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express (...) It is emitted in kernel/context_tracking.c, ct_kernel_exit(): WARN_ON_ONCE(ct_nmi_nesting() != CT_NESTING_IRQ_NONIDLE); The kernel contains the following comment in ct_irq_enter(): "If your architecture's idle loop does do upcalls to user mode (or does anything else that results in unbalanced calls to the irq_enter() and irq_exit() functions), RCU will give you what you deserve, good and hard. But very infrequently and irreproducibly. Use things like work queues to work around this limitation. You have been warned." Stern language, some actual help to pinpoint the problem so I can work on it would be appreciated. Inserting prints reveals that the ct_nmi_nesting() often deviates from CT_NESTING_IRQ_NONIDLE at ct_kernel_exit() by a few multiple of 2 counts up or down. Open questions: - Generic entry requires PTRACE_SYSEMU and PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP to be defined. I added them but don't even know what they do or if generic entry magically adds support for them (probably not) so I need help here. - I need Al Viro's input on how to deal with the "fast syscall restart" that I bluntly deleted, if we need to reincarnate it in the generic entry or what we shall do here. - I need to test with an OABI rootfs. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> --- Changes in v2: - Performance impact measurements have been provided. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010-arm-generic-entry-v1-0-b94f451d087b@linaro.org --- Linus Walleij (28): ARM: Prepare includes for generic entry ARM: ptrace: Split report_syscall() ARM: entry: Skip ret_slow_syscall label ARM: process: Rewrite ret_from_fork i C ARM: process: Remove local restart ARM: entry: Invoke syscalls using C ARM: entry: Rewrite two asm calls in C ARM: entry: Move trace entry to C function ARM: entry: save the syscall sp in thread_info ARM: entry: move all tracing invocation to C ARM: entry: Merge the common and trace entry code ARM: entry: Rename syscall invocation ARM: entry: Create user_mode_enter/exit ARM: entry: Drop trace argument from usr_entry macro ARM: entry: Separate call path for syscall SWI entry ARM: entry: Drop argument to asm_irqentry macros ARM: entry: Implement syscall_exit_to_user_mode() ARM: entry: Drop the superfast ret_fast_syscall ARM: entry: Remove fast and offset register restore ARM: entry: Untangle ret_fast_syscall/to_user ARM: entry: Do not double-call exit functions ARM: entry: Move work processing to C ARM: entry: Stop exiting syscalls like IRQs ARM: entry: Complete syscall and IRQ transition to C ARM: entry: Create irqentry calls from kernel mode ARM: entry: Move in-kernel hardirq tracing to C ARM: entry: Add FIQ/NMI C callbacks ARM: entry: Convert to generic entry arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm/include/asm/entry-common.h | 66 ++++++++++++ arch/arm/include/asm/entry.h | 17 +++ arch/arm/include/asm/ptrace.h | 8 +- arch/arm/include/asm/signal.h | 4 - arch/arm/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 2 +- arch/arm/include/asm/switch_to.h | 4 + arch/arm/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 ++ arch/arm/include/asm/thread_info.h | 18 +--- arch/arm/include/asm/traps.h | 2 +- arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/ptrace.h | 2 + arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 5 +- arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 + arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 39 +++---- arch/arm/kernel/entry-common.S | 202 ++++++++++++++---------------------- arch/arm/kernel/entry-header.S | 108 +++++-------------- arch/arm/kernel/entry.c | 59 +++++++++++ arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 22 +++- arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c | 76 -------------- arch/arm/kernel/signal.c | 57 ++-------- arch/arm/kernel/syscall.c | 31 ++++++ arch/arm/kernel/traps.c | 2 +- 22 files changed, 349 insertions(+), 384 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 67bc0ffd4658eb91d061a6efa83da65ec838c2ac change-id: 20240903-arm-generic-entry-ada145378bbe Best regards,