Message ID | 063aafdf-3234-42ac-a4ea-3ff98e2835b6@stanley.mountain (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [next] wifi: mt76: mt7925: fix error checking in mt7925_mcu_uni_rx/tx_ba() | expand |
Ping. regards, dan carpenter On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:46:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The "ret" variable in mt7925_mcu_uni_[rx/tx]_ba() needs to be signed for > the if (ret < 0) condition to be true. > > Also the mt7925_mcu_sta_ba() function returns positive values on success. > The code currently returns whatever non-negative value was returned on > the last iteration. It would be better to return zero on success. This > function is called from mt7925_ampdu_action() which does not check the > return value so the return value doesn't affect runtime. However, it > still makes sense to return zero even though nothing is affected in the > current code. > > Fixes: eb2a9a12c609 ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO") > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c | 14 ++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > index 15815ad84713..b3a00964e802 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > @@ -617,7 +617,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, > struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf; > unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif); > struct mt76_wcid *wcid; > - u8 link_id, ret; > + u8 link_id; > + int ret; > > for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) { > mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id); > @@ -630,10 +631,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, > ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params, > enable, true); > if (ret < 0) > - break; > + return ret; > } > > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, > @@ -647,7 +648,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, > struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf; > unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif); > struct mt76_wcid *wcid; > - u8 link_id, ret; > + u8 link_id; > + int ret; > > for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) { > mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id); > @@ -657,10 +659,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, > ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params, > enable, false); > if (ret < 0) > - break; > + return ret; > } > > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > static int mt7925_load_clc(struct mt792x_dev *dev, const char *fw_name) > -- > 2.45.2 >
On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 16:15 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until > you have verified the sender or the content. > > > Ping. > > regards, > dan carpenter > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 12:46:58PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > The "ret" variable in mt7925_mcu_uni_[rx/tx]_ba() needs to be > > signed for > > the if (ret < 0) condition to be true. > > > > Also the mt7925_mcu_sta_ba() function returns positive values on > > success. > > The code currently returns whatever non-negative value was returned > > on > > the last iteration. It would be better to return zero on success. > > This > > function is called from mt7925_ampdu_action() which does not check > > the > > return value so the return value doesn't affect runtime. However, > > it > > still makes sense to return zero even though nothing is affected in > > the > > current code. > > > > Fixes: eb2a9a12c609 ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update > > mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO") > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c | 14 ++++++++----- > > - > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > > index 15815ad84713..b3a00964e802 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c > > @@ -617,7 +617,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev > > *dev, > > struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf; > > unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif); > > struct mt76_wcid *wcid; > > - u8 link_id, ret; > > + u8 link_id; > > + int ret; > > > > for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, > > IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) { > > mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id); > > @@ -630,10 +631,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev > > *dev, > > ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, > > wcid, params, > > enable, true); > > if (ret < 0) > > - break; > > + return ret; > > } > > > > - return ret; > > + return 0; > > } > > > > int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, > > @@ -647,7 +648,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev > > *dev, > > struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf; > > unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif); > > struct mt76_wcid *wcid; > > - u8 link_id, ret; > > + u8 link_id; > > + int ret; > > > > for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, > > IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) { > > mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id); > > @@ -657,10 +659,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev > > *dev, > > ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, > > wcid, params, > > enable, false); > > if (ret < 0) > > - break; > > + return ret; > > } > > > > - return ret; > > + return 0; > > } > > > > static int mt7925_load_clc(struct mt792x_dev *dev, const char > > *fw_name) > > -- > > 2.45.2 > > Hi Dan, We plan to revert this patch, and the patch is already ongoing as well. https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20250114020712.704254-1-sean.wang@kernel.org/ Best Regards, Yen.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c index 15815ad84713..b3a00964e802 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c @@ -617,7 +617,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf; unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif); struct mt76_wcid *wcid; - u8 link_id, ret; + u8 link_id; + int ret; for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) { mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id); @@ -630,10 +631,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_tx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params, enable, true); if (ret < 0) - break; + return ret; } - return ret; + return 0; } int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, @@ -647,7 +648,8 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, struct mt792x_bss_conf *mconf; unsigned long usable_links = ieee80211_vif_usable_links(vif); struct mt76_wcid *wcid; - u8 link_id, ret; + u8 link_id; + int ret; for_each_set_bit(link_id, &usable_links, IEEE80211_MLD_MAX_NUM_LINKS) { mconf = mt792x_vif_to_link(mvif, link_id); @@ -657,10 +659,10 @@ int mt7925_mcu_uni_rx_ba(struct mt792x_dev *dev, ret = mt7925_mcu_sta_ba(&dev->mt76, &mconf->mt76, wcid, params, enable, false); if (ret < 0) - break; + return ret; } - return ret; + return 0; } static int mt7925_load_clc(struct mt792x_dev *dev, const char *fw_name)
The "ret" variable in mt7925_mcu_uni_[rx/tx]_ba() needs to be signed for the if (ret < 0) condition to be true. Also the mt7925_mcu_sta_ba() function returns positive values on success. The code currently returns whatever non-negative value was returned on the last iteration. It would be better to return zero on success. This function is called from mt7925_ampdu_action() which does not check the return value so the return value doesn't affect runtime. However, it still makes sense to return zero even though nothing is affected in the current code. Fixes: eb2a9a12c609 ("wifi: mt76: mt7925: Update mt7925_mcu_uni_[tx,rx]_ba for MLO") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> --- drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/mcu.c | 14 ++++++++------ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)