From patchwork Thu May 19 19:59:35 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Linus Walleij X-Patchwork-Id: 799732 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by demeter1.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p4JK29TO007134 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:02:30 GMT Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QN9O4-00088t-KR; Thu, 19 May 2011 20:00:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QN9Nz-0000YP-IH; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:59:55 +0000 Received: from eu1sys200aog103.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.115]) by canuck.infradead.org with smtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QN9Nv-0000Y6-1t for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:59:52 +0000 Received: from beta.dmz-us.st.com ([167.4.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob103.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKTdV2sMM6spG+fd0XR8NnwH/sxXIApqQB@postini.com; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:59:50 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-us.st.com (ns4.st.com [167.4.16.71]) by beta.dmz-us.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 5C7CB3C; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:59:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay2.stm.gmessaging.net (unknown [10.230.100.18]) by zeta.dmz-us.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id A023861; Thu, 19 May 2011 19:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from exdcvycastm022.EQ1STM.local (alteon-source-exch [10.230.100.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "exdcvycastm022", Issuer "exdcvycastm022" (not verified)) by relay2.stm.gmessaging.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABB7A8065; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:59:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.230.100.153) by smtp.stericsson.com (10.230.100.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Thu, 19 May 2011 21:59:41 +0200 From: Linus Walleij To: Grant Likely , , Subject: [PATCH] gpio: rename VIA local config struct Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 21:59:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1305835175-31351-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20110519_155951_538249_5FFA9B63 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 19.36 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [207.126.144.115 listed in list.dnswl.org] Cc: Linus Walleij , Lee Jones X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (demeter1.kernel.org [140.211.167.41]); Thu, 19 May 2011 20:02:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Linus Walleij The local VIA GPIO config struct "gpio_config" collides with my extension to the gpio_chip struct, so rename it to viafb_gpio_config so we don't get this clash. Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- drivers/video/via/via-gpio.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/video/via/via-gpio.c b/drivers/video/via/via-gpio.c index c2a0a1c..ab53418 100644 --- a/drivers/video/via/via-gpio.c +++ b/drivers/video/via/via-gpio.c @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static int via_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int nr) } -static struct viafb_gpio_cfg gpio_config = { +static struct viafb_gpio_cfg viafb_gpio_config = { .gpio_chip = { .label = "VIAFB onboard GPIO", .owner = THIS_MODULE, @@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ static int viafb_gpio_resume(void *private) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio; i += 2) - viafb_gpio_enable(gpio_config.active_gpios[i]); + for (i = 0; i < viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio; i += 2) + viafb_gpio_enable(viafb_gpio_config.active_gpios[i]); return 0; } @@ -201,9 +201,9 @@ int viafb_gpio_lookup(const char *name) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio; i++) - if (!strcmp(name, gpio_config.active_gpios[i]->vg_name)) - return gpio_config.gpio_chip.base + i; + for (i = 0; i < viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio; i++) + if (!strcmp(name, viafb_gpio_config.active_gpios[i]->vg_name)) + return viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.base + i; return -1; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(viafb_gpio_lookup); @@ -229,14 +229,15 @@ static __devinit int viafb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *platdev) for (gpio = viafb_all_gpios; gpio < viafb_all_gpios + VIAFB_NUM_GPIOS; gpio++) if (gpio->vg_port_index == port_cfg[i].ioport_index) { - gpio_config.active_gpios[ngpio] = gpio; - gpio_config.gpio_names[ngpio] = gpio->vg_name; + viafb_gpio_config.active_gpios[ngpio] = gpio; + viafb_gpio_config.gpio_names[ngpio] = + gpio->vg_name; ngpio++; } } - gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio = ngpio; - gpio_config.gpio_chip.names = gpio_config.gpio_names; - gpio_config.vdev = vdev; + viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio = ngpio; + viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.names = viafb_gpio_config.gpio_names; + viafb_gpio_config.vdev = vdev; if (ngpio == 0) { printk(KERN_INFO "viafb: no GPIOs configured\n"); return 0; @@ -245,18 +246,18 @@ static __devinit int viafb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *platdev) * Enable the ports. They come in pairs, with a single * enable bit for both. */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&viafb_gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); for (i = 0; i < ngpio; i += 2) - viafb_gpio_enable(gpio_config.active_gpios[i]); - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); + viafb_gpio_enable(viafb_gpio_config.active_gpios[i]); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&viafb_gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); /* * Get registered. */ - gpio_config.gpio_chip.base = -1; /* Dynamic */ - ret = gpiochip_add(&gpio_config.gpio_chip); + viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.base = -1; /* Dynamic */ + ret = gpiochip_add(&viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip); if (ret) { printk(KERN_ERR "viafb: failed to add gpios (%d)\n", ret); - gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio = 0; + viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio = 0; } #ifdef CONFIG_PM viafb_pm_register(&viafb_gpio_pm_hooks); @@ -277,8 +278,8 @@ static int viafb_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *platdev) /* * Get unregistered. */ - if (gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio > 0) { - ret = gpiochip_remove(&gpio_config.gpio_chip); + if (viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio > 0) { + ret = gpiochip_remove(&viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip); if (ret) { /* Somebody still using it? */ printk(KERN_ERR "Viafb: GPIO remove failed\n"); return ret; @@ -287,11 +288,11 @@ static int viafb_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *platdev) /* * Disable the ports. */ - spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); - for (i = 0; i < gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio; i += 2) - viafb_gpio_disable(gpio_config.active_gpios[i]); - gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio = 0; - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); + spin_lock_irqsave(&viafb_gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); + for (i = 0; i < viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio; i += 2) + viafb_gpio_disable(viafb_gpio_config.active_gpios[i]); + viafb_gpio_config.gpio_chip.ngpio = 0; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&viafb_gpio_config.vdev->reg_lock, flags); return ret; }