Message ID | 1312715131-3956-1-git-send-email-dbaryshkov@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: > The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as > a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers. > So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than > in __initdata. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> > Cc: stable@kernel.org Any comments on this patch? > diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt) > sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt); > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE > +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = { > +#else > static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = { > +#endif > .owner = THIS_MODULE, > .hw_init = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_init, > .hw_shutdown = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_shutdown, > -- > 1.7.2.5 > >
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: >> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as >> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers. >> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than >> in __initdata. >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> >> Cc: stable@kernel.org > > Any comments on this patch? > >> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644 >> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt) >> sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt); >> } >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE >> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = { >> +#else >> static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = { >> +#endif Looks OK, and maybe we can put it even simpler by just removing __initdata. >> .owner = THIS_MODULE, >> .hw_init = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_init, >> .hw_shutdown = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_shutdown, >> -- >> 1.7.2.5 >> >> > > > > -- > With best wishes > Dmitry >
On Fri 2011-08-19 10:19:33, Eric Miao wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov > > <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as > >> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers. > >> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than > >> in __initdata. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> > >> Cc: stable@kernel.org > > > > Any comments on this patch? > > > >> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > >> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > >> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c > >> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt) > >> sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt); > >> } > >> > >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE > >> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = { > >> +#else > >> static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = { > >> +#endif > > Looks OK, and maybe we can put it even simpler by just removing __initdata. I'd say so; ifdef to have initdata there is just too ugly. But I don't think it is stable material...
Hello, On 8/27/11, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote: > On Fri 2011-08-19 10:19:33, Eric Miao wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >> <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov >> > <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as >> >> a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers. >> >> So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than >> >> in __initdata. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> >> >> Cc: stable@kernel.org >> > >> > Any comments on this patch? >> > >> >> diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> >> b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> >> index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> >> +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c >> >> @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct >> >> soc_pcmcia_socket *skt) >> >> sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt); >> >> } >> >> >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE >> >> +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = { >> >> +#else >> >> static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = { >> >> +#endif >> >> Looks OK, and maybe we can put it even simpler by just removing >> __initdata. > > I'd say so; ifdef to have initdata there is just too ugly. But I > don't think it is stable material... Maybe... And memory lost on PXA will be minimal. It's stable material in the sense that lack of this patch causes kernel panics.
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c index 69ae2fd..f2405dc 100644 --- a/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c +++ b/drivers/pcmcia/pxa2xx_sharpsl.c @@ -219,7 +219,11 @@ static void sharpsl_pcmcia_socket_suspend(struct soc_pcmcia_socket *skt) sharpsl_pcmcia_init_reset(skt); } +#ifdef CONFIG_SA1100_COLLIE +static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops = { +#else static struct pcmcia_low_level sharpsl_pcmcia_ops __initdata = { +#endif .owner = THIS_MODULE, .hw_init = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_init, .hw_shutdown = sharpsl_pcmcia_hw_shutdown,
The pxa2xx_sharpsl driver part is also used on collie, which (as a StrongARM board) has different expectations for PCMCIA drivers. So, on collie place sharpsl_pcmcia_ops in .data section rather than in __initdata. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org