From patchwork Mon Aug 8 17:16:10 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Will Deacon X-Patchwork-Id: 1046192 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by demeter2.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p78HH5oc010041 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:17:25 GMT Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QqTRY-00028E-F2; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:16:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QqTRX-00059x-4t; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:16:47 +0000 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QqTR5-00053G-PM for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:16:20 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.69.60]) by cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id p78HFi1A021547; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 18:15:45 +0100 (BST) From: Will Deacon To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 09/10] ARM: perf: allow armpmu to implement mode exclusion Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 18:16:10 +0100 Message-Id: <1312823771-9952-10-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1312823771-9952-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> References: <1312823771-9952-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20110808_131620_077538_838E88B3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 20.59 ) X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-3.1 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [217.140.96.50 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain Cc: jamie@jamieiles.com, Will Deacon , j-pihet@ti.com X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (demeter2.kernel.org [140.211.167.43]); Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:17:25 +0000 (UTC) Modern PMUs allow for mode exclusion, so we no longer wish to return -EPERM if it is requested. This patch provides a hook in the armpmu structure for implementing mode exclusion. The hw_perf_event initialisation is slightly delayed so that the backend code can update the structure if required. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon --- arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c index 00e57f1..8a5e2ac 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ struct arm_pmu { void (*disable)(struct hw_perf_event *evt, int idx); int (*get_event_idx)(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct hw_perf_event *hwc); + int (*set_event_filter)(struct hw_perf_event *evt, + struct perf_event_attr *attr); u32 (*read_counter)(int idx); void (*write_counter)(int idx, u32 val); void (*start)(void); @@ -479,6 +481,13 @@ hw_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event) } static int +event_requires_mode_exclusion(struct perf_event_attr *attr) +{ + return attr->exclude_idle || attr->exclude_user || + attr->exclude_kernel || attr->exclude_hv; +} + +static int __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event) { struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw; @@ -503,34 +512,31 @@ __hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event) } /* + * We don't assign an index until we actually place the event onto + * hardware. Use -1 to signify that we haven't decided where to put it + * yet. For SMP systems, each core has it's own PMU so we can't do any + * clever allocation or constraints checking at this point. + */ + hwc->idx = -1; + hwc->config_base = 0; + hwc->config = 0; + hwc->event_base = 0; + + /* * Check whether we need to exclude the counter from certain modes. - * The ARM performance counters are on all of the time so if someone - * has asked us for some excludes then we have to fail. */ - if (event->attr.exclude_kernel || event->attr.exclude_user || - event->attr.exclude_hv || event->attr.exclude_idle) { + if ((!armpmu->set_event_filter || + armpmu->set_event_filter(hwc, &event->attr)) && + event_requires_mode_exclusion(&event->attr)) { pr_debug("ARM performance counters do not support " "mode exclusion\n"); return -EPERM; } /* - * We don't assign an index until we actually place the event onto - * hardware. Use -1 to signify that we haven't decided where to put it - * yet. For SMP systems, each core has it's own PMU so we can't do any - * clever allocation or constraints checking at this point. - */ - hwc->idx = -1; - - /* - * Store the event encoding into the config_base field. config and - * event_base are unused as the only 2 things we need to know are - * the event mapping and the counter to use. The counter to use is - * also the indx and the config_base is the event type. + * Store the event encoding into the config_base field. */ - hwc->config_base = (unsigned long)mapping; - hwc->config = 0; - hwc->event_base = 0; + hwc->config_base |= (unsigned long)mapping; if (!hwc->sample_period) { hwc->sample_period = armpmu->max_period;