From patchwork Wed Aug 24 09:23:46 2011 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Linus Walleij X-Patchwork-Id: 1091672 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by demeter1.kernel.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p7O9OhoH018555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:25:04 GMT Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([2001:4978:20e::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qw9h3-00070v-9X; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:24:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=canuck.infradead.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qw9h2-0007Ky-KQ; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:24:16 +0000 Received: from eu1sys200aog111.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.131]) by canuck.infradead.org with smtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Qw9gk-0007He-4p for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:23:59 +0000 Received: from beta.dmz-us.st.com ([167.4.1.35]) (using TLSv1) by eu1sys200aob111.postini.com ([207.126.147.11]) with SMTP ID DSNKTlTDKWKDX/suWgD5NmlHY4DyTJVutT5j@postini.com; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:23:57 UTC Received: from zeta.dmz-us.st.com (ns4.st.com [167.4.16.71]) by beta.dmz-us.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 15DE26F; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:23:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay2.stm.gmessaging.net (unknown [10.230.100.18]) by zeta.dmz-us.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id B03304E; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:23:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from exdcvycastm022.EQ1STM.local (alteon-source-exch [10.230.100.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "exdcvycastm022", Issuer "exdcvycastm022" (not verified)) by relay2.stm.gmessaging.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E966A807D; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:23:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.230.100.153) by smtp.stericsson.com (10.230.100.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:23:50 +0200 From: Linus Walleij To: Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mach-ux500: initialize l2x0 at arch_init time Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:23:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1314177826-19151-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.3.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20090807-BlameThorstenAndJenny ( TRE 0.7.6 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20110824_052358_499554_44C66DB7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.50 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.1 on canuck.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.3 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [207.126.144.131 listed in list.dnswl.org] Cc: Linus Walleij , Rabin Vincent , Lee Jones , Srinidhi Kasagar X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (demeter1.kernel.org [140.211.167.41]); Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:25:21 +0000 (UTC) From: Linus Walleij mach-imx initialize their l2x0 cach at arch_init time, so why shouldn't we. Cc: Srinidhi Kasagar Cc: Rabin Vincent Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij --- arch/arm/mach-ux500/cache-l2x0.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cache-l2x0.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cache-l2x0.c index 9d09e4d..aa2d77f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cache-l2x0.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cache-l2x0.c @@ -69,4 +69,4 @@ static int ux500_l2x0_init(void) return 0; } -early_initcall(ux500_l2x0_init); +arch_initcall(ux500_l2x0_init);