From patchwork Tue Jul 24 01:09:14 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Cyril Chemparathy X-Patchwork-Id: 1415511 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork2.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork2.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2A9DFFCF for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 15:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1T9dU2-0000Tz-QY; Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:55:07 +0000 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1StTdC-0002Z7-CZ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2012 01:10:15 +0000 Received: from dlelxv30.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q6O19dpH011168; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:09:39 -0500 Received: from DFLE73.ent.ti.com (dfle73.ent.ti.com [128.247.5.110]) by dlelxv30.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6O19dEr010260; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:09:39 -0500 Received: from dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (172.17.1.197) by dfle73.ent.ti.com (128.247.5.110) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:09:39 -0500 Received: from ares-ubuntu.am.dhcp.ti.com (ares-ubuntu.am.dhcp.ti.com [158.218.103.17]) by dlelxv22.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6O19d28024587; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:09:39 -0500 Received: from a0875269 by ares-ubuntu.am.dhcp.ti.com with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1StTd5-0002UQ-0u; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:09:39 -0400 From: Cyril Chemparathy To: Subject: [RFC 12/23] ARM: mm: clean up membank size limit checks Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:09:14 -0400 Message-ID: <1343092165-9470-13-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1343092165-9470-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> References: <1343092165-9470-1-git-send-email-cyril@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Bad-Reply: References and In-Reply-To but no 'Re:' in Subject. X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-6.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [192.94.94.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 10:43:36 -0400 Cc: nico@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Andrianov , Cyril Chemparathy X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This patch cleans up the highmem sanity check code by simplifying the range checks with a pre-calculated size_limit. This patch should otherwise have no functional impact on behavior. This patch also removes a redundant (bank->start < vmalloc_limit) check, since this is already covered by the !highmem condition. Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov --- arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 19 +++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c index 4840efa..6b0baf3 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c @@ -905,10 +905,15 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) { struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j]; + phys_addr_t size_limit; + *bank = meminfo.bank[i]; + size_limit = bank->size; if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) highmem = 1; + else + size_limit = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -917,8 +922,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping * the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later. */ - if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit && - bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) { + if (!highmem && bank->size > size_limit) { if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) { printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, " "ignoring high memory\n"); @@ -927,12 +931,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) (meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank)); meminfo.nr_banks++; i++; - bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start; + bank[1].size -= size_limit; bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit; bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1; j++; } - bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; + bank->size = size_limit; } #else /* @@ -950,14 +954,13 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit) - unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; + if (bank->size > size_limit) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start, (unsigned long long)bank->start + bank->size - 1, - (unsigned long long)bank->start + newsize - 1); - bank->size = newsize; + (unsigned long long)bank->start + size_limit - 1); + bank->size = size_limit; } #endif if (!bank->highmem && bank->start + bank->size > arm_lowmem_limit)