From patchwork Tue Aug 14 14:18:51 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Shubhrajyoti Datta X-Patchwork-Id: 1320501 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438EA40B1E for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1T1I5P-0007J3-03; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:27:11 +0000 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1T1HyS-0003Gn-Mn for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:20:04 +0000 Received: from dbdp20.itg.ti.com ([172.24.170.38]) by arroyo.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id q7EEJOvW030254; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:19:25 -0500 Received: from DBDE71.ent.ti.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dbdp20.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7EEJLMD026373; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:49:24 +0530 (IST) Received: from dbdp33.itg.ti.com (172.24.170.252) by DBDE71.ent.ti.com (172.24.170.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:49:22 +0530 Received: from ula0393217.india.ti.com (smtpvbd.itg.ti.com [172.24.170.250]) by dbdp33.itg.ti.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q7EEJGmF011366; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:49:22 +0530 From: Shubhrajyoti D To: Subject: [PATCHv6 09/24] i2c: omap: switch over to do {} while loop Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 19:48:51 +0530 Message-ID: <1344953946-13005-10-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.5.4 In-Reply-To: <1344953946-13005-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> References: <1344953946-13005-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -6.9 (------) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-6.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high trust [192.94.94.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: tony@atomide.com, w.sang@pengutronix.de, Felipe Balbi , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, ben-linux@fluff.org, Shubhrajyoti D , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Felipe Balbi this will make sure that we execute at least once. No functional changes otherwise. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c index d4b6f7d..8b80799 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c @@ -827,20 +827,28 @@ omap_i2c_isr(int this_irq, void *dev_id) struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = dev_id; u16 bits; u16 stat; - int err, count = 0; + int err = 0, count = 0; if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev->dev)) return IRQ_NONE; - bits = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG); - while ((stat = (omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG))) & bits) { + do { + bits = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_IE_REG); + stat = omap_i2c_read_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG); + stat &= bits; + + if (!stat) { + /* my work here is done */ + return IRQ_HANDLED; + } + dev_dbg(dev->dev, "IRQ (ISR = 0x%04x)\n", stat); if (count++ == 100) { dev_warn(dev->dev, "Too much work in one IRQ\n"); - break; + omap_i2c_complete_cmd(dev, err); + return IRQ_HANDLED; } - err = 0; complete: /* * Ack the stat in one go, but [R/X]DR and [R/X]RDY should be @@ -940,7 +948,7 @@ complete: dev_err(dev->dev, "Transmit underflow\n"); dev->cmd_err |= OMAP_I2C_STAT_XUDF; } - } + } while (stat); return count ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE; }