From patchwork Thu Aug 23 13:27:28 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Nicolas Ferre X-Patchwork-Id: 1367161 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C2B3FC66 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1T4XRg-0007bc-Qn; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:27:36 +0000 Received: from eusmtp01.atmel.com ([212.144.249.242]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1T4XRd-0007ac-Ce for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 13:27:33 +0000 Received: from HNOCHT01.corp.atmel.com (10.161.30.161) by eusmtp01.atmel.com (10.161.101.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.1; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:28:59 +0200 Received: from tenerife.rfo.atmel.com (10.159.245.203) by HNOCHT01.corp.atmel.com (10.161.30.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.1; Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:27:31 +0200 From: Nicolas Ferre To: , , Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91/feature-removal-schedule: delay at91_mci removal Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:27:28 +0200 Message-ID: <1345728448-29384-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.159.245.203] X-Spam-Note: CRM114 invocation failed X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.1 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.2 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: arnd@arndb.de, Nicolas Ferre , ludovic.desroches@atmel.com, olof@lixom.net, cjb@laptop.org, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Ludovic Desroches Delay sd/mmc driver at91_mci.c removal because of tight schedule to move platform data to new driver atmel-mci. Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre --- Hi, I plan to queue this one with the at91-fixes pull-request for 3.6. If you do not feel it is a good idea, please say so. Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt index afaff31..f4d8c71 100644 --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ Why: KVM tracepoints provide mostly equivalent information in a much more ---------------------------- What: at91-mci driver ("CONFIG_MMC_AT91") -When: 3.7 +When: 3.8 Why: There are two mci drivers: at91-mci and atmel-mci. The PDC support was added to atmel-mci as a first step to support more chips. Then at91-mci was kept only for old IP versions (on at91rm9200 and