Message ID | 1355348588-22318-2-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 12/13/2012 08:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:43:04PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >> The Cross Trigger Interface (CTI) helpers in cti.h include definitions >> for the Coresight Lock Access Register (LAR) and Lock Status Register >> (LSR). These registers are already defined in coresight.h and so rather >> than having multiple definitions, just use the definitions from >> coresight.h. >> >> Add the following coresight macros ... >> - coresight_unlock() --> Unlocks coresight module >> - coresight_lock() --> Locks coresight module >> >> Use the above macros for ETB, ETM and CTI. The do-while(0) statement >> has been removed from the macro as it is not a multi-line macro. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h | 16 +++------------- >> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h | 16 ++++++++-------- >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > [...] > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h >> index 7ecd793..dcd0e66 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h >> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h >> @@ -141,17 +141,17 @@ >> #define ETBFF_TRIGEVT BIT(9) >> #define ETBFF_TRIGFL BIT(10) >> >> -#define etb_writel(t, v, x) \ >> - (__raw_writel((v), (t)->etb_regs + (x))) >> +#define etb_writel(t, v, x) (__raw_writel((v), (t)->etb_regs + (x))) >> #define etb_readl(t, x) (__raw_readl((t)->etb_regs + (x))) >> >> -#define etm_lock(t) do { etm_writel((t), 0, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >> -#define etm_unlock(t) \ >> - do { etm_writel((t), UNLOCK_MAGIC, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >> +#define etb_lock(t) coresight_lock((t)->etb_regs) >> +#define etb_unlock(t) coresight_unlock((t)->etb_regs) >> +#define etm_lock(t) coresight_lock((t)->etm_regs) >> +#define etm_unlock(t) coresight_unlock((t)->etm_regs) >> >> -#define etb_lock(t) do { etb_writel((t), 0, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >> -#define etb_unlock(t) \ >> - do { etb_writel((t), UNLOCK_MAGIC, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >> +#define coresight_lock(base) (__raw_writel(0, base + CSMR_LOCKACCESS)) >> +#define coresight_unlock(base) \ >> + (__raw_writel(UNLOCK_MAGIC, base + CSMR_LOCKACCESS)) >> >> #endif /* __ASM_HARDWARE_CORESIGHT_H */ > > How about we take this opportunity to divorce the more general coresight > bits from the etb specific parts, like you've done for the cti. We could > move the ETB stuff out into asm/etb.h (although it might be nice to keep all > the coresight device headers in one place... answers on a postcard) and just > have the architected coresight functionality in this header. Yes I have been wondering about that too. Long term it would be good to find a home in the drivers directory for all these coresight devices too. For now, we could extract the etb/etm parts from coresight.h into etb.h and etm.h, respectively. Cheers Jon
Hi Jon, Will, On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> wrote: > > On 12/13/2012 08:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 09:43:04PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: >>> The Cross Trigger Interface (CTI) helpers in cti.h include definitions >>> for the Coresight Lock Access Register (LAR) and Lock Status Register >>> (LSR). These registers are already defined in coresight.h and so rather >>> than having multiple definitions, just use the definitions from >>> coresight.h. >>> >>> Add the following coresight macros ... >>> - coresight_unlock() --> Unlocks coresight module >>> - coresight_lock() --> Locks coresight module >>> >>> Use the above macros for ETB, ETM and CTI. The do-while(0) statement >>> has been removed from the macro as it is not a multi-line macro. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h | 16 +++------------- >>> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h | 16 ++++++++-------- >>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) >> >> [...] >> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h >>> index 7ecd793..dcd0e66 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h >>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h >>> @@ -141,17 +141,17 @@ >>> #define ETBFF_TRIGEVT BIT(9) >>> #define ETBFF_TRIGFL BIT(10) >>> >>> -#define etb_writel(t, v, x) \ >>> - (__raw_writel((v), (t)->etb_regs + (x))) >>> +#define etb_writel(t, v, x) (__raw_writel((v), (t)->etb_regs + (x))) >>> #define etb_readl(t, x) (__raw_readl((t)->etb_regs + (x))) >>> >>> -#define etm_lock(t) do { etm_writel((t), 0, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >>> -#define etm_unlock(t) \ >>> - do { etm_writel((t), UNLOCK_MAGIC, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >>> +#define etb_lock(t) coresight_lock((t)->etb_regs) >>> +#define etb_unlock(t) coresight_unlock((t)->etb_regs) >>> +#define etm_lock(t) coresight_lock((t)->etm_regs) >>> +#define etm_unlock(t) coresight_unlock((t)->etm_regs) >>> >>> -#define etb_lock(t) do { etb_writel((t), 0, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >>> -#define etb_unlock(t) \ >>> - do { etb_writel((t), UNLOCK_MAGIC, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) >>> +#define coresight_lock(base) (__raw_writel(0, base + CSMR_LOCKACCESS)) >>> +#define coresight_unlock(base) \ >>> + (__raw_writel(UNLOCK_MAGIC, base + CSMR_LOCKACCESS)) >>> >>> #endif /* __ASM_HARDWARE_CORESIGHT_H */ >> >> How about we take this opportunity to divorce the more general coresight >> bits from the etb specific parts, like you've done for the cti. We could >> move the ETB stuff out into asm/etb.h (although it might be nice to keep all >> the coresight device headers in one place... answers on a postcard) and just >> have the architected coresight functionality in this header. > > Yes I have been wondering about that too. Long term it would be good to > find a home in the drivers directory for all these coresight devices > too. For now, we could extract the etb/etm parts from coresight.h into > etb.h and etm.h, respectively. I am now writing a HW trace driver that extracts traces from the CMI and PMI IP blocks (and later L2CC). It is still in early development status. The idea I have in mind is to have the implementation in drivers/power/hw_trace. Eventually this directory would contain the drivers for ETM/ETB, CMI, PMI and also the coresight support. It would be architected so that the lower level drivers export the necessary functions for the higher level code to use the resource. Example: the PMI driver would use the ETB and coresight drivers. What do you think? Regards, Jean > > Cheers > Jon > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h index f2e5cad..00add00 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ #define __ASMARM_CTI_H #include <asm/io.h> +#include <asm/hardware/coresight.h> /* The registers' definition is from section 3.2 of * Embedded Cross Trigger Revision: r0p0 @@ -29,17 +30,6 @@ #define CTIPCELLID2 0xFF8 #define CTIPCELLID3 0xFFC -/* The below are from section 3.6.4 of - * CoreSight v1.0 Architecture Specification - */ -#define LOCKACCESS 0xFB0 -#define LOCKSTATUS 0xFB4 - -/* write this value to LOCKACCESS will unlock the module, and - * other value will lock the module - */ -#define LOCKCODE 0xC5ACCE55 - /** * struct cti - cross trigger interface struct * @base: mapped virtual address for the cti base @@ -146,7 +136,7 @@ static inline void cti_irq_ack(struct cti *cti) */ static inline void cti_unlock(struct cti *cti) { - __raw_writel(LOCKCODE, cti->base + LOCKACCESS); + coresight_unlock(cti->base); } /** @@ -158,6 +148,6 @@ static inline void cti_unlock(struct cti *cti) */ static inline void cti_lock(struct cti *cti) { - __raw_writel(~LOCKCODE, cti->base + LOCKACCESS); + coresight_lock(cti->base); } #endif diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h index 7ecd793..dcd0e66 100644 --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h @@ -141,17 +141,17 @@ #define ETBFF_TRIGEVT BIT(9) #define ETBFF_TRIGFL BIT(10) -#define etb_writel(t, v, x) \ - (__raw_writel((v), (t)->etb_regs + (x))) +#define etb_writel(t, v, x) (__raw_writel((v), (t)->etb_regs + (x))) #define etb_readl(t, x) (__raw_readl((t)->etb_regs + (x))) -#define etm_lock(t) do { etm_writel((t), 0, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) -#define etm_unlock(t) \ - do { etm_writel((t), UNLOCK_MAGIC, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) +#define etb_lock(t) coresight_lock((t)->etb_regs) +#define etb_unlock(t) coresight_unlock((t)->etb_regs) +#define etm_lock(t) coresight_lock((t)->etm_regs) +#define etm_unlock(t) coresight_unlock((t)->etm_regs) -#define etb_lock(t) do { etb_writel((t), 0, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) -#define etb_unlock(t) \ - do { etb_writel((t), UNLOCK_MAGIC, CSMR_LOCKACCESS); } while (0) +#define coresight_lock(base) (__raw_writel(0, base + CSMR_LOCKACCESS)) +#define coresight_unlock(base) \ + (__raw_writel(UNLOCK_MAGIC, base + CSMR_LOCKACCESS)) #endif /* __ASM_HARDWARE_CORESIGHT_H */
The Cross Trigger Interface (CTI) helpers in cti.h include definitions for the Coresight Lock Access Register (LAR) and Lock Status Register (LSR). These registers are already defined in coresight.h and so rather than having multiple definitions, just use the definitions from coresight.h. Add the following coresight macros ... - coresight_unlock() --> Unlocks coresight module - coresight_lock() --> Locks coresight module Use the above macros for ETB, ETM and CTI. The do-while(0) statement has been removed from the macro as it is not a multi-line macro. Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com> --- arch/arm/include/asm/cti.h | 16 +++------------- arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/coresight.h | 16 ++++++++-------- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)