From patchwork Fri Jan 18 07:31:05 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Haojian Zhuang X-Patchwork-Id: 1999681 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2491B3FD86 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:34:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Tw6Qa-0005cs-GM; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:31:52 +0000 Received: from mail-pb0-f53.google.com ([209.85.160.53]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Tw6QK-0005ZU-Vs for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 07:31:37 +0000 Received: by mail-pb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id un1so1245733pbc.26 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:31:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to :references:x-gm-message-state; bh=LjV2x1w2o6lEghsFWNKTKox8AUqM1jjFC+MmpKeXcbo=; b=BLA3G7idAJ3qMkHV6TW1rFZ6u09sedvXpByfWeZos0/tCeYOIyf4pqKyhE1cO+/pFS 4dezYGwTHG7kJ8FsgC36LV+5OcGPaBzJamnOyYq73EMDPqz9BaVk2957lxFsfByHig7z RUZDAfTQln2H9LgHfQaCQtUEBvJGPynZfMFCmUBvkZGH0nOPNhvqiAJF2SDujhNGdF+w t6cPKFySRFx5wWuudAajOVnZnCw7C99cREY67daj9UXd/cVyqHZdFT3GPiP2eLmaUK8Z nEH3JRLdw0sysT2aoLAisSWScgMZp9BmKcP+wONKx1nzbTVpXijYMf+cD/XLcAvLv4eW xptQ== X-Received: by 10.68.190.227 with SMTP id gt3mr2483668pbc.5.1358494295377; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:31:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([98.126.173.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm2922899paw.19.2013.01.17.23.31.32 (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:31:34 -0800 (PST) From: Haojian Zhuang To: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tony@atomide.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, swarren@nvidia.com Subject: [PATCH v7 01/15] Revert "pinctrl: single: support gpio request and free" Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 15:31:05 +0800 Message-Id: <1358494279-16503-2-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 In-Reply-To: <1358494279-16503-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> References: <1358494279-16503-1-git-send-email-haojian.zhuang@linaro.org> X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0W+Idyk+RyhnETU/YYtv9RX9Y7FX7XI0sB+mVNVidUcqCofg+Y3p0lwpXND48s/9EAJNs X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130118_023137_123100_AAF85B11 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.99 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.6 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.160.53 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: Haojian Zhuang X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org This reverts commit 2e8b2eab94c35d83bb7da71c63b4695f32ddca88. Conflicts: drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.ko] undefined!] On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Russell King wrote: > The above error happens in builds including pinctrl-single - the > reason > is this, where resource_size_t may be 64-bit. > > gpio->range.pin_base = (r.start - pcs->res->start) / > mux_bytes; > gpio->range.npins = (r.end - r.start) / mux_bytes + 1; The reason of not fixing this issue and reverting the patch instead is this patch can't handle another case. It's not easy to handle multiple gpios sharing one pin register. So this gpio range feature will be implemented by other patches. Acked-by: Tony Lindgren --- drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 79 +------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c index f6a360b..5c32e88 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ #define PCS_MUX_BITS_NAME "pinctrl-single,bits" #define PCS_REG_NAME_LEN ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 2) + 1) #define PCS_OFF_DISABLED ~0U -#define PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES 2 /** * struct pcs_pingroup - pingroups for a function @@ -78,16 +77,6 @@ struct pcs_function { }; /** - * struct pcs_gpio_range - pinctrl gpio range - * @range: subrange of the GPIO number space - * @gpio_func: gpio function value in the pinmux register - */ -struct pcs_gpio_range { - struct pinctrl_gpio_range range; - int gpio_func; -}; - -/** * struct pcs_data - wrapper for data needed by pinctrl framework * @pa: pindesc array * @cur: index to current element @@ -414,26 +403,9 @@ static void pcs_disable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned fselector, } static int pcs_request_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, - struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range, unsigned pin) + struct pinctrl_gpio_range *range, unsigned offset) { - struct pcs_device *pcs = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev); - struct pcs_gpio_range *gpio = NULL; - int end, mux_bytes; - unsigned data; - - gpio = container_of(range, struct pcs_gpio_range, range); - end = range->pin_base + range->npins - 1; - if (pin < range->pin_base || pin > end) { - dev_err(pctldev->dev, - "pin %d isn't in the range of %d to %d\n", - pin, range->pin_base, end); - return -EINVAL; - } - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; - data = pcs->read(pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes) & ~pcs->fmask; - data |= gpio->gpio_func; - pcs->write(data, pcs->base + pin * mux_bytes); - return 0; + return -ENOTSUPP; } static struct pinmux_ops pcs_pinmux_ops = { @@ -907,49 +879,6 @@ static void pcs_free_resources(struct pcs_device *pcs) static struct of_device_id pcs_of_match[]; -static int pcs_add_gpio_range(struct device_node *node, struct pcs_device *pcs) -{ - struct pcs_gpio_range *gpio; - struct device_node *child; - struct resource r; - const char name[] = "pinctrl-single"; - u32 gpiores[PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES]; - int ret, i = 0, mux_bytes = 0; - - for_each_child_of_node(node, child) { - ret = of_address_to_resource(child, 0, &r); - if (ret < 0) - continue; - memset(gpiores, 0, sizeof(u32) * PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES); - ret = of_property_read_u32_array(child, "pinctrl-single,gpio", - gpiores, PCS_MAX_GPIO_VALUES); - if (ret < 0) - continue; - gpio = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gpio) { - dev_err(pcs->dev, "failed to allocate pcs gpio\n"); - return -ENOMEM; - } - gpio->range.name = devm_kzalloc(pcs->dev, sizeof(name), - GFP_KERNEL); - if (!gpio->range.name) { - dev_err(pcs->dev, "failed to allocate range name\n"); - return -ENOMEM; - } - memcpy((char *)gpio->range.name, name, sizeof(name)); - - gpio->range.id = i++; - gpio->range.base = gpiores[0]; - gpio->gpio_func = gpiores[1]; - mux_bytes = pcs->width / BITS_PER_BYTE; - gpio->range.pin_base = (r.start - pcs->res->start) / mux_bytes; - gpio->range.npins = (r.end - r.start) / mux_bytes + 1; - - pinctrl_add_gpio_range(pcs->pctl, &gpio->range); - } - return 0; -} - static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; @@ -1046,10 +975,6 @@ static int pcs_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto free; } - ret = pcs_add_gpio_range(np, pcs); - if (ret < 0) - goto free; - dev_info(pcs->dev, "%i pins at pa %p size %u\n", pcs->desc.npins, pcs->base, pcs->size);