From patchwork Wed Feb 6 05:21:16 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Joonsoo Kim X-Patchwork-Id: 2101751 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork2.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork2.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01995DFE82 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 05:24:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U2xRi-00038f-BO; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:21:22 +0000 Received: from lgemrelse7q.lge.com ([156.147.1.151]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U2xRc-00036n-Ng for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2013 05:21:18 +0000 X-AuditID: 9c930197-b7ca4ae000006ba8-b9-5111e8496745 Received: from js1304-P5Q-DELUXE.LGE.NET ( [10.177.220.249]) by LGEMRELSE7Q.lge.com (Symantec Brightmail Gateway) with SMTP id 1E.77.27560.948E1115; Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:21:13 +0900 (KST) From: Joonsoo Kim To: Russell King Subject: [PATCH RESEND] ARM: sched: correct update_sched_clock() Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:21:16 +0900 Message-Id: <1360128076-8555-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130206_002117_082168_224FD400 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.40 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-4.9 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [156.147.1.151 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: Joonsoo Kim , Linus Walleij , js1304@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org If we want load epoch_cyc and epoch_ns atomically, we should update epoch_cyc_copy first of all. This notify reader that updating is in progress. If we update epoch_cyc first like as current implementation, there is subtle error case. Look at the below example. cyc = 9 ns = 900 cyc_copy = 9 == CASE 1 == write cyc = 10 read cyc = 10 read ns = 900 write ns = 1000 write cyc_copy = 10 read cyc_copy = 10 output = (10, 900) == CASE 2 == read cyc = 9 write cyc = 10 write ns = 1000 read ns = 1000 read cyc_copy = 9 write cyc_copy = 10 output = (9, 1000) If atomic read is ensured, output should be (9, 900) or (10, 1000). But, output in example case are not. So, change updating sequence in order to correct this problem. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c index fc6692e..bd6f56b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c @@ -93,11 +93,11 @@ static void notrace update_sched_clock(void) * detectable in cyc_to_fixed_sched_clock(). */ raw_local_irq_save(flags); - cd.epoch_cyc = cyc; + cd.epoch_cyc_copy = cyc; smp_wmb(); cd.epoch_ns = ns; smp_wmb(); - cd.epoch_cyc_copy = cyc; + cd.epoch_cyc = cyc; raw_local_irq_restore(flags); }