From patchwork Tue Feb 12 19:22:19 2013 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ezequiel Garcia X-Patchwork-Id: 2130731 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-linux-arm@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-process-083081@patchwork1.kernel.org Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) by patchwork1.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E73F3FD4F for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U5LRr-0002WH-Cy; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:23:23 +0000 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([94.23.35.102]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1U5LR4-0002Ez-GO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:22:35 +0000 Received: by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix, from userid 106) id 581F181F; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:22:34 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.free-electrons.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SHORTCIRCUIT shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from localhost.localdomain (20.222.3.200.ros.express.com.ar [200.3.222.20]) by mail.free-electrons.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B516F7B2; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:22:31 +0100 (CET) From: Ezequiel Garcia To: , Subject: [PATCH v3 3/8] ARM: omap2: gpmc: Fix gpmc_cs_reserved() return value Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:22:19 -0300 Message-Id: <1360696944-3371-4-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.8.6 In-Reply-To: <1360696944-3371-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> References: <1360696944-3371-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20130212_142234_977172_47E44E0A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.29 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.3.2 on merlin.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (-2.6 points) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Cc: Tony Lindgren , Afzal Mohammed , Ezequiel Garcia , Jon Hunter , Felipe Balbi X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+patchwork-linux-arm=patchwork.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Currently gpmc_cs_reserved() return value is somewhat inconsistent, returning a negative value on an error condition, a positive value if the chip select is reserved and zero if it's available. Fix this by returning a boolean value as the function name suggests: * true if the chip select is reserved, * false if it's available Suggested-by: Felipe Balbi Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter --- Changelog from v1: * As suggested by Felipe Balbi, fix return code to a boolean arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c index bd3bc93..fa4764f 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c @@ -452,10 +452,10 @@ static int gpmc_cs_set_reserved(int cs, int reserved) return 0; } -static int gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs) +static bool gpmc_cs_reserved(int cs) { if (cs > GPMC_CS_NUM) - return -ENODEV; + return true; return gpmc_cs_map & (1 << cs); }