| Message ID | 1390299016-14105-4-git-send-email-acourbot@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 01/21/2014 03:10 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > As discussed previously (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/289), enable > Trusted Foundation support by default since it already depends on a > supporting architecture being selected. > > Doing so allows us to remove it from tegra_defconfig. > arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 1 - > arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig | 1 + Can we split out the defconfig and code changes into separate patches? They need to go through seperate branches, possibly even separate repos. The defconfig change might not even be necessary; at some point I'll just rebuild it via "make tegra_defconfig; make savedefconfig" on top of some linux-next that includes the Kconfig change, and it'll happen automatically. Still, I guess there's no harm explicitly sending the patch.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > On 01/21/2014 03:10 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> As discussed previously (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/289), enable >> Trusted Foundation support by default since it already depends on a >> supporting architecture being selected. >> >> Doing so allows us to remove it from tegra_defconfig. > >> arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 1 - >> arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig | 1 + > > Can we split out the defconfig and code changes into separate patches? > They need to go through seperate branches, possibly even separate repos. > > The defconfig change might not even be necessary; at some point I'll > just rebuild it via "make tegra_defconfig; make savedefconfig" on top of > some linux-next that includes the Kconfig change, and it'll happen > automatically. Still, I guess there's no harm explicitly sending the patch. If we can do without the defconfig change then I will just omit it in the next version - I don't like sending too many oneliners. :P
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig index 5fdc9a09d339..e38653876541 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ CONFIG_PCI=y CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y CONFIG_PCI_TEGRA=y CONFIG_PCIEPORTBUS=y -CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS=y CONFIG_SMP=y CONFIG_PREEMPT=y CONFIG_AEABI=y diff --git a/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig b/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig index bb126594995e..ad396af68e47 100644 --- a/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ menu "Firmware options" config TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS bool "Trusted Foundations secure monitor support" depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS + default y help Some devices (including most Tegra-based consumer devices on the market) are booted with the Trusted Foundations secure monitor
As discussed previously (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/26/289), enable Trusted Foundation support by default since it already depends on a supporting architecture being selected. Doing so allows us to remove it from tegra_defconfig. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com> --- arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 1 - arch/arm/firmware/Kconfig | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)